Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





RE: Maple back and sides?   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: <<   <   1 [2]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
Sean

Posts: 672
Joined: Jan. 20 2011
From: Canada

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Ricardo) 
His opinion is wrong, sorry.
Seasoned Maple is one of the most crack resistant woods ever used in guitar making.
Even flatsawn, Birdseye Maple, with all those little defects and potential weak points is more crack resistant then a lot of Rosewoods.
I wonder how much extra doming he uses for Brazilian?

_____________________________
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 16 2013 15:26:37
 
Alain Moisan

Posts: 30
Joined: Jul. 24 2012
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to jshelton5040) 
quote:

ORIGINAL: jshelton5040

quote:

ORIGINAL: MiSz

I'm working on a birdseye maple guitar. Today i showed it to an experienced luthier. He said the matter about doming a maple back is because in his opinion maple cracks a bit more often than other woods.
And a back doming is of course a good crack protection.

Well cured maple is no more prone to cracking than any other wood. Perhaps you can explain how doming of the back is good crack protection. My understanding of the reason for doming is to add stiffness and eliminate parallel surfaces.


Maple being more prone to cracking is news to me as well. But doming a top pr back does provide extra security against cracking. Du to the wood shrinking like a dry sponge, a top or back will always 'drop' towards the inside of the guitar when it is exposed to dry conditions. A domed top or back (compared to a true flat surface) will provide more margin of manoeuvre to the top or back before the wood tensions is great enough to crack the wood.

_____________________________

Alain Moisan
Les Guitares Moisan
www.guitaresmoisan.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 16 2013 20:58:13
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Alain Moisan) 
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alain Moisan

Maple being more prone to cracking is news to me as well. But doming a top pr back does provide extra security against cracking. Du to the wood shrinking like a dry sponge, a top or back will always 'drop' towards the inside of the guitar when it is exposed to dry conditions. A domed top or back (compared to a true flat surface) will provide more margin of manoeuvre to the top or back before the wood tensions is great enough to crack the wood.

I did say well cured but your point seems sound. It just never occurred to me that there was any other reason than the ones I stated,

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 16 2013 21:59:50
 
estebanana

Posts: 9368
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
Crack: wipe it, don't smoke it.

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 17 2013 18:03:36
 
constructordeguitarras

Posts: 1677
Joined: Jan. 29 2012
From: Seattle, Washington, USA

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
My 2 pesetas: I dome every guitar about the same, but I must say that I have found maple to be one of the woods that is least stable to changes in humidity. That is, it expands and contracts a lot compared to other woods, so I can understand why someone might like to dome it more, to absorb such changes without cracking.

_____________________________

Ethan Deutsch
www.edluthier.com
www.facebook.com/ethandeutschguitars
www.youtube.com/marioamayaflamenco
I always have flamenco guitars available for sale.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 18 2013 6:29:08
 
Ned Milburn

 

Posts: 4
Joined: Apr. 18 2013
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
Hello All,

I was recommended this forum by a local flamenco guitarist and was interested in this thread since I will begin building 2 flamenco guitars (again for local guitarists) very soon - one with Nootka (or Canadian) cypress (aka: Alaskan yellow cedar) and one with maple sides and back.

Here is what I can add, starting with stating the obvious.

Wood expands and contracts at a higher rate longitudinally (across the grain) than parallel to the grain. Each species has its own expansion and contraction rates, and the variation between the longitudinal and parallel expansion also varies depending upon species. Hence, if a back were to be built flat, it would deform the sides as it gained or lost humidity compared to its condition during construction. This is one of the reasons why backs are domed. The side to side dome on a guitar back allows the dome to increase or decrease as humidity is gained or lost from the wood, avoiding deformation of the sides.

There is a spectacular resource for any wood-worker called "The Wood Database". Since I cannot flip browser tabs while writing this post without losing the draft, I'll only include one link that I was able to copy.

http://www.wood-database.com/lumber-identification/hardwoods/bigleaf-maple/

You can click the upper right "search by common name" and find different woods to compare expansion rates with the readings of the maple. If I remember correctly, the expansion/contraction rates are given near the bottom of the wood's specifications.

Interesting to note is the fact that Honduras mahogany has a very similar expansion rate longitudinally and parallel to the grain. This is why mahogany is widely considered "dimensionally stable". Brazilian rosewood has a very low longitudinal expansion rate. Indian rosewood is medium, while maple (big leaf) has a higher rate of longitudinal expansion. Also of note is Alaskan yellow cedar, which is much more stable than I would have thought for such a soft and light wood. These specs give evidence for various people's claims that maple is "less stable" than other side/back wood choices. Also, this could be the reason that some builders may decide to build a slightly greater dome in maple backed guitars than other wooded guitars. (Although I am also of the opinion as a few other forum members stated that there shouldn't be a problem building a maple backed guitar with a standard dome.)

I believe it is a good idea to understand a species' properties before working with it. Nowadays, with resources such as the Wood Database, we have access to information that centuries ago would have only been gained by direct experience, empiricism, and/or working as an apprentice to a master who already experienced different woods' properties through direct empiricism.

Cheers! I'm looking forward to reading and participating further in this forum.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 18 2013 4:21:38
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14841
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Ned Milburn) 
quote:

These specs give evidence for various people's claims that maple is "less stable" than other side/back wood choices. Also, this could be the reason that some builders may decide to build a slightly greater dome in maple backed guitars than other wooded guitars. (Although I am also of the opinion as a few other forum members stated that there shouldn't be a problem building a maple backed guitar with a standard dome.)


Cool thanks. I was wondering for a bit if perhaps the flamed longitudinal design figure of the maple was producing a sort of optical illusion that it was more domed than it really was. I think so because comparing to my other guitars it certainly is domed a very slightly bit more but not as much as I was honestly thinking at first.

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 18 2013 17:24:48
 
estebanana

Posts: 9368
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
Jason picked up his new maple guitar last night, he was reading this thread about maple. He said:

"Hmm I think maple must be pretty good guitar wood if the Italians used it for making cello backs and sides, seems it's proved to be pretty stable over the last 400 years."

I never give it a second thought. Maple rocks the Casbah. But of course I don't really make proper gutiars because I brush on the shellac and then level it later, so I don't really count as legitimate. And of course Jason plays all these "jazz chords" so he's pretty lost too.

Although, he liked the new maple guitar so much, ( long pause) he picked it up last night and he's taking it out on a tour for the next week. I thank God those Italians used maple or I would never have known and might have read some newfangled books or something legitimate instead of going off half-cocked on my own and making dilettante guitars with brushed on shellac.

Videos pending.

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 18 2013 19:52:14
 
Morante

 

Posts: 2184
Joined: Nov. 21 2010
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to estebanana) 
The best guitar I ever played was a Rodriguez which Postigo had. Spruce top, maple back and sides. Told me it was not for sale. I believe he sold it to a Japanese for 25,000 euros.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 18 2013 20:37:25
 
estebanana

Posts: 9368
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
Maple is an underrated guitar wood.

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 18 2013 20:45:08
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14841
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to estebanana) 
quote:

ORIGINAL: estebanana

Maple is an underrated guitar wood.


yep, it't the new old blanca. great for jazz chords even if it is 400 years old. those violins and cellos don't look flat backed though.

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 18 2013 21:24:28
 
estebanana

Posts: 9368
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Ricardo) 
quote:

hose violins and cellos don't look flat backed though.


A lot of cellos did have flat backs, they were converted bass viola da gambas. They added a bit of wood at the top to round out the shoulders and then changed the neck and top to a cello neck and top. There is vary famous Strad cello that used to be a gamba.

But of course those Old Italians did not know the Foro rules of doming at an 18" radius so they wee obviously dilettante failures.

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 18 2013 22:38:50
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
She had the sweetest nylon trebles I recall and beautiful sustain.
( Only returned her for too little separation.)





Ruphus

Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

Attachment (2)
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 18 2013 22:39:13
 
mark74

Posts: 690
Joined: Jan. 26 2011
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
Are the midrange Cordobas made with English sycamore, hence why they sometimes say Sycamore and sometimes say Maple?
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 21 2013 6:29:54
 
krichards

Posts: 597
Joined: Jan. 14 2007
From: York, England

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to mark74) 
English Sycamore, Acer Pseudoplatanus, widely grown all over Europe and western Asia.
This is the wood used in violins etc. and is an excellent guitar wood.

I think this is the wood referred to in this thread, but there are similar species both in Europe and the Americas referred to as Maples.
Its confusing!

_____________________________

Kevin Richards

http://www.facebook.com/#!/kevin.richards.1048554
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 21 2013 6:56:41
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
Popular names are always confusing when it comes to wood. When i say oak, I think about another tree than a canadian does.
To me its extremely confusing that in England, you call a tree sycamore when sycamore is somthing else other places.
It adds to the confusion that europe is full of different languages and not just english.

So this thread is confusing, because we are talking about different species and using one word.
To generalice, I think that instruments built in Europe are made with Acer Pseudoplatanus also called maple, arce, ahorn, English Sycamore and so on.
In the US, maple is other species of the Acer family.

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 21 2013 7:58:53
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Ruphus) 
quote:

She had the sweetest nylon trebles I recall and beautiful sustain.
( Only returned her for too little separation.)


Those are my experiences as well and I´m not the biggest fan of maple (Acer Pseudoplatanus) in flamenco guitars.
I like it a lot in steel strung, plucked instruments like acoustic steel string guitars and the whole mandolin family, where it gives some elegancy to the trebles. And of course, its the king of bowed instruments,

On classicals, it can make very sweet sounding instruments, but the ones I´ve tried (not many) lacked projection and power.

I think a lot of people like maples mostly because it looks good

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 21 2013 8:05:28
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: Maple back and sides? (in reply to Sean) 
That could be; "white" seems attractive.
Neighbours son had a mediocre beginner guitar that was somewhat bearable at least. Recently then he came by to show me his new guitar and ask me why it couldn´t hold the tune. ( hidden hairline crack at neck tail )
The thing was one of the worst instruments I´ve seen. And as he couldn´t expalin why he had obtained it in exchange for his former guitar I said: "Because this one is laquered in white, isn´t it?"
And he smiled embarassed.

I had bought a cheapo acoustic bass of maple B&S from China.
It was on the soft side, but it sounded so totally like rock and like electrically distorted.
Absolutely inspiring. You would just rock the chair away. I miss it.
Too bad that it was built of green wood apparently. The top sunk in stored in a case at moderate humidity conditions. :0(

Ruphus
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 21 2013 11:22:28
Page:   <<   <   1 [2]
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: <<   <   1 [2]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.078125 secs.