Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva, Tom Blackshear and Sean O'Brien who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
I was using the diamond secure beads, and I thought I'd look for nylon strings that had ball-ends. I got a set from Guitar Center just out of curiosity.
D'Addario and likely other companies make similar ones.
So far, so good...
Thoughts?
Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
Ugly as hell...both the ball ends and the 12 hole diagonal lines. Traditional tie your strings is the best.
I agree. The traditional way to tie the strings is still the best. It is easily done, and in doing so you avoid having your guitar look like it has Christmas tree ornaments protruding from the tie-block.
Bill
_____________________________
And the end of the fight is a tombstone white, With the name of the late deceased, And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here, Who tried to hustle the East."
Some bridges with traditional string attachment method give too shallow angle for the strings.
Nonsense...except in extreme cases where the guitar is defective. A zero break angle works just fine with NO SADDLE (so long as string touches bridge where saddle would be for intonation), but some angle is needed so you don’t get buzzing OR can adjust the action higher if so desired. But lust for extreme break angles on low bridges is silly.
I recently heard a high end dealer basically say about a guitar “sounds fantastic but the break angle is too shallow.”. My thought was if it sounds great what does the break angle matter.....
The strings seem to sound good, but I’m also on the fence about having bridge dingleberries....