Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
RE: Building a modification of a 1968 Conde
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
eccullen
Posts: 98
Joined: Aug. 14 2007
|
RE: Building a modification of a 196... (in reply to Tom Blackshear)
|
|
|
Ive wondered about the "vowel tone" that Tom B has referred to many times. I came across this interview with Matthias Dammann: http://hajos-kontrapunkte.blogspot.ie/2011/03/matthias-damann-luthier-guitarist-and.html Matthias: The central point for me is the aural experience of my own playing . My guitar studies, which I have concluded in Frankfurt, were in every respect very intense. During this period basic features of my playing technique and the associated sound conceptions were substantially engraved. My personal ideal of sound is characterized by a very strong fundamental resonance. If you take for example a harpsichord. If you play it, you will notice that bass notes have very strong harmonics whereas the basic tone is in comparison relatively small. In contrast the piano has a much more fundamental resonance. When we look at the guitar, the relation between the fundamental resonance and the harmonics varies from one guitar to another. An instrument tuned to a deep fundamental resonance will not only be defined by a strong bass. The deep fundamental tuning will be noticed also in the high registers. This means that also an instrument with a weak bass can be stronger in the fundamental resonance than an instrument with a strong bass register but whose sound is thin and nasal. Stringed instruments are valued according to similar criteria. In use is the formant theory, which uses the complex tonal sound of vocals in order to classify an instrument. An instrument can sound like: "U", "O", "A", "E" and "I". With the tone color of the vocal a judgement is associated. Instruments, which sound after “E” or “I”, have a nasal character and will be set aside. Instruments, which sound after “O” or “A”, will be preferred. Instruments, which sound after “U”, sound dark and musty and will not be regarded as good instruments.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Mar. 15 2015 16:59:11
|
|
Tom Blackshear
Posts: 2304
Joined: Apr. 15 2008
|
RE: Building a modification of a 196... (in reply to eccullen)
|
|
|
Thanks I've read the article already but what I gather from him is more of an explanation of different sounds of audio explained rather than "where do I go to create certain tonal changes. etc. I think it would be a better service to explain this information to those who don't know about it. quote:
ORIGINAL: eccullen Ive wondered about the "vowel tone" that Tom B has referred to many times. I came across this interview with Matthias Dammann: http://hajos-kontrapunkte.blogspot.ie/2011/03/matthias-damann-luthier-guitarist-and.html Matthias: The central point for me is the aural experience of my own playing . My guitar studies, which I have concluded in Frankfurt, were in every respect very intense. During this period basic features of my playing technique and the associated sound conceptions were substantially engraved. My personal ideal of sound is characterized by a very strong fundamental resonance. If you take for example a harpsichord. If you play it, you will notice that bass notes have very strong harmonics whereas the basic tone is in comparison relatively small. In contrast the piano has a much more fundamental resonance. When we look at the guitar, the relation between the fundamental resonance and the harmonics varies from one guitar to another. An instrument tuned to a deep fundamental resonance will not only be defined by a strong bass. The deep fundamental tuning will be noticed also in the high registers. This means that also an instrument with a weak bass can be stronger in the fundamental resonance than an instrument with a strong bass register but whose sound is thin and nasal. Stringed instruments are valued according to similar criteria. In use is the formant theory, which uses the complex tonal sound of vocals in order to classify an instrument. An instrument can sound like: "U", "O", "A", "E" and "I". With the tone color of the vocal a judgement is associated. Instruments, which sound after “E” or “I”, have a nasal character and will be set aside. Instruments, which sound after “O” or “A”, will be preferred. Instruments, which sound after “U”, sound dark and musty and will not be regarded as good instruments.
_____________________________
Tom Blackshear Guitar maker
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Mar. 15 2015 19:30:53
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
7.714844E-02 secs.
|