zata -> RE: 2s in bulerias examples (Jul. 6 2004 20:41:23)
|
quote:
I do listen to cante for a couple hours every day, every day for many years and some things I hear could agree with your theory, but I also hear things that do not. Also, I have two good friends from Jerez and when we're sitting around playing or listening to music they clap and pat their foot in threes if they do not know the music of a particular bulerias, not twos. One could make the argument that they are interpreting TWO threes as the basic unit of bulerias, but I don't see or hear them making twos. Andy, this is not a theory, mine or anyone else's. Not many people have analyzed what makes bulerías tick, but it's been ticking for over a hundred years. I've already addressed everything you say. When you listen to cante all those hours, I have the feeling you're waiting for something to jump out at you phrased in twos. It is not going to happen. *You* have to put the twos and then observe the structure that unfolds, like peering into a crystal and seeing all the facets. Your friends can pat in 3s or not at all, they can "waggle their feet aimlessly" as I wrote in another message...if they play bulerías in compás, the twos are guiding their way even if they never stopped to analyze what they're doing, something few people do. Analysis however is valuable for people who approach flamenco from another culture and need to catch up quick. I wish I'd saved all the messages of people who wrote privately or posted how they resisted the idea of a binary compás in bulerías and tried it to prove it couldn't work...only to discover it opened a very large door that allowed them to play solid bulerías as never before, improvise, and accompany any rhythmic quirk thrown at them with absolute authority. I also wrote that anyone who is secure in bulerías doesn't need to analyze anything. The young man whose clip began this conversation probably thinks he plays in compás but it's just a string of notes. Almost in compás is out of compás. I've got *my* bulerías house in order, but from the continuous messages on this topic my guess is not everyone else is completely confident with this exciting and endlessly surprising form. Ron just posted some comments worth considering... Estela 'Zata'
|
|
|
|