Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
Posts: 2007
Joined: Jul. 12 2004
From: San Francisco
Sabicas had no compas
I saw this post on a facebook group today. I think the person who wrote it is a student of he who cannot be named. It's about as ignorant as anything I've ever seen written about flamenco.
Here it is:
btw: I did play a bunch of his music when I was much younger. When I look back on it, it was such a gigantic waist of time FOR ME, but if you like the music and want to play it go for it. My big point in our earlier conversation about Sabicas was this: Learning his music won't help you play Flamenco as it is played today.
Also Sabicas has no compas. Absolutely zero compas. I have 6 year olds with better time. ...and such an obnoxious golpe ...and the music moves exactly nowhere harmonically. Personally, I would classify Sabicas as a sloppy classical guitarist paying Flamenco-ish music. I'd rather listen to a real classical guitarist, but I'm harsh and unforgiving so...
...But seriously somebody buy that guy a metronome!
I highly doubt it, but there is a slight chance he posted that to show allegiance to his guru. Maybe he still hasn't saved up 12000€ for the guitar and has to preach the Word to keep being part of the cult.
I highly doubt it, but there is a slight chance he posted that to show allegiance to his guru. Maybe he still hasn't saved up 12000€ for the guitar and has to preach the Word to keep being part of the cult.
This post is so ridiculous that I’m more inclined to take it for a troll: you know, the kind that posts outrageous statements just to get a rise out of the old hands.
Either way, it’s not worth dignifying with a reply.
Ignoramuses can certainly do damage on Wikipedia, however — the page on Manitas de Plata is a case in point. If you want a good laugh, take a look at the Talk page, the section headed Esteem by aficionados of flamenco.
The tiny kernel of truth in all that is that it does seem, at least to me, that playing cuadrado is more important to contemporary players than it was for their predecessors. Influence of baile perhaps?
But yeah, that's just me trying to be overly charitable. It really was a load of BS. Accompanying seguiriyas must be hell for him if he defines compas by the metronome.
_____________________________
"Anything you do can be fixed. What you cannot fix is the perfection of a blank page. What you cannot fix is that pristine, unsullied whiteness of a screen or a page with nothing on it—because there’s nothing there to fix."
Sabicas was the most in-demand and well-respected tocaor of his generation. Whether or not you think his music has aged well (obviously most would say it has), he was a huge part of the foundation on which modern flamenco was built. He influenced every guitarist who came after him. Does his music have the harmonic or rhythmic complexity of PdL's? Of course not, because no one did until PdL came along.
this dude sounds like he can play the guitar with telekinesis only... how can one be so full of himself 🙄 sabicas is one of, if not THE most important flamenco guitarist of the modern age. his malagueña made me start learning flamenco. even in some of PdL's falsetas you can hear sabicas' influence. somebody who talks like this clearly has no respect for the art and probably will never be a proper guitarist... 😑
and I find it funny that we can say LORD VOLDEMORT in this foro but not "his" name... 😂 what facebook group is this if I may ask?
Hahahahahhaha. Why are you guys wasting time giving counters to this fella's argument? Best thing to do is go on whatever group that was in on Facebook and find the commentator, then check out how he plays. You can be sure it is not to any great level because the vast majority of great musicians understand how difficult it is and have a high degree of both empathy and humility, not this boorish grandstanding.
the vast majority of great musicians understand how difficult it is and have a high degree of both empathy and humility, not this boorish grandstanding.
Does his music have the harmonic or rhythmic complexity of PdL's? Of course not, because no one did until PdL came along.
Of course, you are right.
Seeking new ways of expression is a great thing. Expanding musical vocabulary is an obvious way to grow as an artist.
The danger, however , is to blur everything out and to dilute too much.
Flamenco is the kind of music that deals with powerful experiences, with greatest joy, human drama and terrible grief. In its purest form it is passed to the listener/spectator with brutal clarity. Nothing is prettified, just the pure concentrated essence of the subject. This is what I picked up on as a child, that flamenco spoke the truth, it never lied.
What I am seeing today among many contemporary artists, is that they took the harmonic and rhythmic expansion to such unprecedented heights, that it kills the meaning of the message. This is very unfortunate, because there is a lot of work and years of study behind such proficiency, and it is very difficult to compose with such a level of detail. But at some point this complexity over-saturates the music and becomes its main feature.
It is like language. Imagine that you have an amazing vocabulary and use it in every single sentence, giving preference to those synonyms of simple words that are most rarely used. Now construct long, complex sentences to better showcase your ability. To my ears, a lot of modern flamenco guitar is approaching this point.
Now imagine you are at the deathbed of a beloved one (let's hope not!). Will you finally part with your style of speaking to say the last words to him/her?
I am not against complexity if it adds to the meaning, but a better balance must be found.
As I indulge in sünnipäevanädalalõpupeopärastlõunaväsimus, such a statuesque asseveration compels me to articulate my own assent to this utterance of a gentleman whose tremendous artistic capability can only be matched by his prodigious sensitivity, which he has so exquisitely divulged in the rightful proclamation above, under which my own agreement can only serve as a modest corroboration upon which I surmise all members present can reach similar accord as to demonstrate some well-advised Freundschaftsbezeugung, behind which resides our deepest appreciativeness for having inculcated multitudinous insights into knowledge most harmonious, never precipitevolissimevolmente, to us your musical lessers, provided there’s pizza.
Sorry, I couldn't resist
_____________________________
"Anything you do can be fixed. What you cannot fix is the perfection of a blank page. What you cannot fix is that pristine, unsullied whiteness of a screen or a page with nothing on it—because there’s nothing there to fix."
I call it pizzadangos por solea. Grab your metronomes everybody, it's gonna be huge!
_____________________________
"Anything you do can be fixed. What you cannot fix is the perfection of a blank page. What you cannot fix is that pristine, unsullied whiteness of a screen or a page with nothing on it—because there’s nothing there to fix."
What I am seeing today among many contemporary artists, is that they took the harmonic and rhythmic expansion to such unprecedented heights, that it kills the meaning of the message. This is very unfortunate, because there is a lot of work and years of study behind such proficiency, and it is very difficult to compose with such a level of detail. But at some point this complexity over-saturates the music and becomes its main feature.
Very true! That's probably why I tend to stick to the traditional stuff frankly.
I listen with admiration and pleasure to many of the modern players, but for me it is most often a different experience than making the acquaintance with Sabicas or Niño Ricardo. The technically and harmonically simple accompaniment of Melchor de Marchena conveys more passion to me than a whole album of some of the more recent players.
Sabicas was not universally admired by contemporary aficionados. In 1962 I was at the club Zambra in New York City. Near closing time Sabicas showed up for the after hours juerga. I enthused about him to the middle aged Spaniard sitting next to us.
“I would rather hear Fernando Sirvent (the house guitarist),” he said.
“Why is that?”
“Sabicas plays too many notes. He’s just showing off.”
I made sure we were allowed to stay after closing time. Sabicas accompanied singers and dancers very simply and tastefully, and readily yielded to other guitarists. He played a couple of solos when strongly encouraged, but showed no sign of fatigue until the sun came up.
Also Sabicas has no compas. Absolutely zero compas. I have 6 year olds with better time. ...and such an obnoxious golpe ...and the music moves exactly nowhere harmonically. Personally, I would classify Sabicas as a sloppy classical guitarist paying Flamenco-ish music. I'd rather listen to a real classical guitarist, but I'm harsh and unforgiving so...
This jerk describes himself as "harsh and unforgiving," which is supposed to convey expertise in the genre. Instead, he has revealed himself to be self-absorbed and ignorant, as most blowhards are. He clearly doesn't know what he doesn't know and therefore thinks he knows everything. Just one more ignorant blowhard adding his voice to that of all the other blowhards in this world.
Bill
_____________________________
And the end of the fight is a tombstone white, With the name of the late deceased, And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here, Who tried to hustle the East."
Freddy Dunning Krueger, the blowhard you don't want to see pop up in your dreams.
_____________________________
"Anything you do can be fixed. What you cannot fix is the perfection of a blank page. What you cannot fix is that pristine, unsullied whiteness of a screen or a page with nothing on it—because there’s nothing there to fix."
“Interesting little article here. It says that, uh… the average human being only uses 17 percent of his brain. Boy, you realize what that means? We don’t use a full, uh… sixty-four percent.” - Cliff Claven
Sorry to leave you hanging-I don't want to step on Simon's toes but suffice to say that the individual in question was banned from the foro. He seemed to think that PdL was God, and he is Moses. That he has devoted followers is, well, the way of the world.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Paul Magnussen
quote:
I think the person who wrote it is a student of he who cannot be named.
Hmm. When I search for “he who cannot be named”, I get no hits whatever.
"Anything you do can be fixed. What you cannot fix is the perfection of a blank page. What you cannot fix is that pristine, unsullied whiteness of a screen or a page with nothing on it—because there’s nothing there to fix."
Come judgement day, he shall get his. He will meet PdL face to face. And PdL shall call upon his by name - the name that no one speaks. Ane when he turns in delite to face Paco, he will be sucker punched in gut by Camaron