Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
papajoo

 

Posts: 2
Joined: Jan. 2 2014
 

Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro 

Hello,
First post on the forum!
So I am looking to get a new guitar and am having trouble deciding between a Cordoba GK pro (negra) or a Francisco Navarro Student (with electronics put in). I have never played the FN but have heard great things. I play more than just flamenco and like the versatility of a negra, however there is a lot of my set that is traditional flamenco. Thoughts on either of these guitars? (negra or blanca)
I have been able to play the GK pro and recently ordered a blanca from guitar center (settled instead of the negra bc it was used and much cheaper) however when it arrived there was significant buzzing and some worrisome cracks that made me return it.) I'm a little nervous about getting the FN without playing it and would like some thoughts from perhaps someone who has played both.
Note: I would get a 50mm nut as I find that more comfortable
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2014 23:17:12
 
rombsix

Posts: 7816
Joined: Jan. 11 2006
From: Beirut, Lebanon

RE: Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro (in reply to papajoo

I own & like the Cordoba GK Studio Negra. I've played a Navarro some years ago & found its pulsation to be stiff & it was somewhat hard to play. I really like the Cordoba GK Studio Negra for the price. I don't know if the Pro offers a huge upgrade to the Cordoba GK Studio Negra.

Cheers!

_____________________________

Ramzi

http://www.youtube.com/rombsix
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2014 0:16:13
 
Miguel de Maria

Posts: 3532
Joined: Oct. 20 2003
From: Phoenix, AZ

RE: Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro (in reply to papajoo

This is rambly, hope it helps. I owned a Navarro negra and play a Cordoba GK FCWE (which isn't really that much like the GK Studio/Pro) as my gig axe. The Navarro was sweet and I wish I hadn't sold it. That being said, I never really could get the strings balanced on the installed Fishman Matrix. The A string always popped out--annoyed the heck out of me. The Cordoba has always had excellent balance, and the trebles might even be a little hot. These are good things to me. I use it for classical, bossas, flamenco, rumbas. The FCWE is a thin body, thinner than the GK Studio, I believe. Good for standing up, but a minus for sitting. The thing is built like a tank and doesn't feed back--it's half glue, I think.

The Navarro will probably sound better than the GK Studio and certainly the FCWE (it has a soft, very midrangey and non-resonant tone). But long story short, if you're plugging in, I think the Cordoba is your ticket. You might even check out the FCWE. It sounds pretty good for plucking, not so much for strumming. You can get an idea from this clip where I'm plugged in

_____________________________

Connect with me on Facebook, all the cool kids are doing it.
https://www.facebook.com/migueldemariaZ


Arizona Wedding Music Guitar
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2014 0:21:00
 
El Burro Flamencuro

 

Posts: 118
Joined: Nov. 28 2012
 

RE: Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro (in reply to papajoo

I've played a Gk studio before and have heard two other people playing them. The one i played seemed terrible. Something about the lack of response, made it really hard to play. The one i played seemed to have no sustain at all...you do want less sustain on a flamenco guitar but this thing was flat out dead to the hands...making it hard to play IMO. But not all guitars, even factory made are equal...you probably could find one that's slightly better than the others. It also could be that the one in the shop had way old/ dead strings.

If you can afford it, i would get a Salvador Castillo. If you contact him directly you can get a blanca with Mexican cypress for $2,200 + $90(bank wires). I just recently purchased a blanca with spanish cypress(+$500) from him and this thing is insane....the sound of this guitar inspires me, everyday. Or maybe you can ask him about the student model? idk how much that goes for directly from him or if that's only through the US run website.

If not, then i would definitely get more opinions on the Navarro, i personally have never heard one but his guitars receive quite the praise on this forum, along with Castillo. My personal preference as per youtube videos is to Castillo but if i couldn't afford the Castillo...then i'd either save up for one or buy a navarro student model.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2014 6:38:57
 
Chilli Fingers

 

Posts: 79
Joined: Sep. 21 2010
 

RE: Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro (in reply to El Burro Flamencuro

Wow I think the dude in the video above successfully created his very own non confronting genre...elevator-menco. Perfect for when your on hold to a multi national corporations speech gateway.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2014 11:01:33
 
papajoo

 

Posts: 2
Joined: Jan. 2 2014
 

RE: Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro (in reply to papajoo

Just to clarify, I am talking about the GK pro, it has solid wood, ebony fretboard, and upgraded electronics compared to the GK studio (laminate, RW board, etc.). The Pro is 1500 negra and 1400 blanca compared to the 700/600 of the studio.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2014 12:15:21
 
NewPlayer

 

Posts: 141
Joined: Nov. 29 2012
From: San Francisco

RE: Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro (in reply to papajoo

Cordoba's are ideal for gigging and using pickups. Cutaway, thick finish, good electronics. Can't go wrong.

I use a Cordoba GK studio for live performances and dont' have to worry about dings and dents. I use my Bernal at home because it is inspiring and much better acoustically.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2014 18:34:52
 
Leñador

Posts: 5237
Joined: Jun. 8 2012
From: Los Angeles

RE: Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro (in reply to papajoo

I've played the GK Pro Negra. Actually much better then the lower end models. Good for what it is for sure. BUT, if you plan to be playing proper flamenco, kinda sucks. Good for Gypsy Kings stuff, bad for Paco stuff. It's just not comfortable on the right hand compared to an actual flamenco, and the acoustic sound doesn't compare. You're gunna need to spend a lot more then that to get a cut away that sounds muy flamenco.

_____________________________

\m/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2014 20:23:58
 
pink

Posts: 570
Joined: Jan. 8 2013
 

RE: Francisco Navarro vs Cordoba GK Pro (in reply to papajoo

Raimundo do/did a cutaway all solid with electrics....fishman blend system.
I think its called the 646e if still available?
I played one last year and it was a nice guitar.
May be worth a look unless anyone here knows better through spending some prelonged time with one.

Best

pink
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2014 21:38:08
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

6.201172E-02 secs.