Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
No 10
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|

Flamingrae
Posts: 218
Joined: May 19 2009

|
RE: No 10 (in reply to Andy Culpepper)
|
|
|
quote:
The most high-tech tentellones I have ever seen. Yeah whats with those peones? what the science? What is your philosophy behind the construction of the interior? Thanks for the compliments guys - I'll do my best on answering. Andy - not so much high tech as hard graft. A bit labour intensive, but all I'm doing is making normal peones, then taking a round file and using that to take out material on the top and bottom of the wedge. I'm used to working on that scale as in another life (still living it) I make and teach jewellery making. Handling on that scale comes second nature. I can do about 70 in 2-2 1/2 hrs if I have the right head on. Stu - The science - I suppose what I'm trying to do is reduce material whilst retaining strength. A bit like using H section steel in construction, only it's a little bit of wood. I just try and space them out evenly for whatever pattern I'm working on. The reduction in material weight might be minimal, but all these minimal differences add up in the course of a build. A bit of spacing, I dont think matters much and I have seen other makers do this. Mango - I left you till last as the others were questions about peonies. Philosophy - there might be better qualified people on here to answer that, but.....most builds, for me are going to mean that I try stuff out - see what happens. If I like the end result, I'll do something similar but with another subtle change. So along with the thicknessing, I've been using only five main fans as they are small guitars. On the treble side I extend this to go through the cross brace - more material to try and encourage the higher trebles. Also slightly bigger closing fan. Reducing this on the bass side as I want to try and encourage the lower frequencies. This time round I decided I wanted to try a bit of scalloping along the fans - to see what happened. I'm not disappointed as such, but my self criticism might say, I made too many variables from my normal. Anyway, it's done and it will be nice to see how it develops and settles down. Sometimes you just have to try things out and see. It's definitely different and I'd put it down to the rosewood in the back and/or the scallops in the fans. There has never been this difference in sound in previous builds. It could be that I'm maybe settling into a way that works for me? Oh and then there is factor X that is in there, meaning it doesn't matter what you do sometimes it could be either amazing or just not quite there - even though you did everything as you normally do. It won't be bad as such, just that some are better than others.You have to enjoy it though - otherwise there is not much point.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Sep. 20 2021 23:01:33
 |
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.0625 secs.
|