Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
Right now I play a negra with: 1st and 2nd: Luthier 30 3rd: Daddario med. tension composite 4th, 5th and 6th: Conder Hermanos medium tension.
I leave the 3 terbles for a long time. A year or so and change the basses. The Condes are good but nothing special, and since they are quite expensive I wont be using them again. So next set of basses will be plain Daddarios.
Yes I have with mixed results. On my Black, medium on the treble and high on the bass worked well. But on my Blanca this approach failed resulting in a dead sound. I think you will just have to experiment until you find the strings that work for your guitar. I hope this is helpful.
I used to do that but now I favor uniformity of manufacture. I now have a set of Galli light tension on my 2007 Lucio Nunez Rayes copy from the measured drawing of Tom Blackshear and for the first time I am happy with the sound. After it warms up a bit. The use of carbon strings on the g is a possibility but with the light tension the Galli is not so thick and ok
I used to do that but now I favor uniformity of manufacture.
There's no uniformity when talking about treble and bass sets. Choose a bass set and a treble set, put a package on it and there you go, new set of strings.
I would rather see some uniformity on tensions from string to string (tighter G & B for instance).
RE: Strings Mix and Match (in reply to Sr. Martins)
quote:
There's no uniformity when talking about treble and bass sets
Dunno about that. The problem on a guitar is the quality of sound between the wound strings and the monofilament. Say one plays a note on a wound string and then plays the same note on a monofilament; the quality would be much different. That is why the Segovia scales emphasize playing up and down a string rather than across the fingerboard One would hope a manufacturer would develope strings to minimize this discrepancy and in a preemptive gesture; penis.
I am referring to balance here. I don't think 3 hi tension bass and 3 low tension trebels would be a good combination while a reputable string maker will carefully size the gauges in a set for a balanced sound.
Dunno about that. The problem on a guitar is the quality of sound between the wound strings and the monofilament.
That´s exactly what I said: "There's no uniformity when talking about treble and bass sets".
You have a set of three basses and a set of trebles, the string makers just pack them togheter.
quote:
I am referring to balance here. I don't think 3 hi tension bass and 3 low tension trebels would be a good combination while a reputable string maker will carefully size the gauges in a set for a balanced sound.
Really? Just check the amount of makers who use the same basses and only change the trebles tension and end up calling the packs HT, MT, etc..
I mix to get the best tension and I like the alliance g string:
Medium savarez corum basses medium savarez alliance G string Hannabach E and B string high tension classical blue
The med tension savarez new cristal E and B strings are also good but I prefer slightly more tension so decided to use the hannabachs, luckily they're available as single strings in many shops.
RE: Strings Mix and Match (in reply to Sr. Martins)
quote:
Really? Just check the amount of makers who use the same basses and only change the trebles tension and end up calling the packs HT, MT, etc..
I haven't check every string maker as to its practice but I have Galli as they are the ones I use. Here are the string diameters for their Genius nylon monofilament sets:
light 028 032 040 029w o33w 042w
med. 029 033 041 029w 037w 044w
hard 029 033 041 030w 038w 045w
While there are some diameters that are the same in both med and hard sets, in every case in the low tension set only the d is duplicated in med tension I suspect as too small a d would be susceptible to breakage. I find that is the only string that is liable to break. So you see there is a difference and depending to the construction of the guitar I find some work better than others. Also I prefer a balanced feel and sound from a carefully graded set. Augustine uses the same trebels with different basses I believe. I used to think their first string was the best on my guitar with Cantiga basses but the first is 030 I now know it was too heavy.
Also I prefer a balanced feel and sound from a carefully graded set.
As you can see from the example you posted, there's no such thing as a "carefully graded set". At best you have "carefully selected trade offs" based on the diameters that each manufacture produces.
RE: Strings Mix and Match (in reply to Sr. Martins)
quote:
As you can see from the example you posted, there's no such thing as a "carefully graded set". At best you have "carefully selected trade offs" based on the diameters that each manufacture produces.
based on the diameters that each manufacture produces.
Oh sure, they just selected the string gauges randomly and then decided how to assemble them in sets.
Based on what you wrote for that particular case (Galli):
quote:
med. 029 033 041 029w 037w 044w
hard 029 033 041 030w 038w 045w
If they were so "careful" with the exact optimal diameters, how come the holy diameters for the trebles would be exactly the same for the MT and HT sets?
RE: Strings Mix and Match (in reply to Sr. Martins)
quote:
If they were so "careful" with the exact optimal diameters, how come the holy diameters for the trebles would be exactly the same for the MT and HT sets?
The designation of tension is the resultant of the pressure of all six strings on the bridge thus a mix of diameters is used chosen according to the quality of sound generated by individual strings. From my comparative chart notice that the greatest variation from set to set is in the 6th and 5th strings. This would suggest, and comparison with other makes support this , the diameter of strings 4th thru 1st is only usable through a narrow range of diameters the exception carbon strings of course. If for what ever reason it rankles you to hear that string manufacturers give any thought in the selection of string gauge, then by all means stick to your belief in a eeny, meeny, miny, moe formula.
What I told you is that there is no such thing as "uniformity of manufacture" as opposed to mixing a treble set with a bass set.
Just take a look at D'Addario and see how many packs of strings are made up of "basses from here and trebles from there".
EJ25 for instance, normal tension basses and high tension trebles. Of course the tensions vary from brand to brand but if what you were saying were true ("uniformity of manufacture"), then those sets like EJ25 would be flawed... or uniform, depends on how you want to see it.
RE: Strings Mix and Match (in reply to Sr. Martins)
quote:
What I told you is that there is no such thing as "uniformity of manufacture" as opposed to mixing a treble set with a bass set.
Just take a look at D'Addario and see how many packs of strings are made up of "basses from here and trebles from there".
I suppose if you wanted to, you could have a set of strings with one from every manufacturer on the planet and it might give the same result as using a complete set from one a manufacturer if the gauges were the same. But why go to all that trouble. If you want to use hi tension bases and low tension trebels go right ahead. I can't understand your beef with string makers. I don't doubt that today it's marketing that drives repackaging of all products. Just go check out the variety of toothpaste today and this extends to all brands. For years the only brand of guitar string available in the US of quality (Black Diamond was available but worthless) was Augustine and they came in only one flavor.
Posts: 219
Joined: Jun. 22 2012
From: Seattle, USA
RE: Strings Mix and Match (in reply to Sr. Martins)
You do realize that you reopened a three year old thread? Why? All of the original posters except for Anders are long gone, and the initial question has been adequately answered. All you're doing is adding noise.
You do realize that you reopened a three year old thread? Why? All of the original posters except for Anders are long gone, and the initial question has been adequately answered. All you're doing is adding noise.
Maybe so, but guys can make friends at loggerheads.
You do realize that you reopened a three year old thread? Why? All of the original posters except for Anders are long gone, and the initial question has been adequately answered. All you're doing is adding noise.
I have many open tabs on my browser at all times, some are from the latest posts and sometimes search results. I don't keep track of post dates and I think they are irrelevant since all topics circle around stuff that you'll be still talking about in another 10 years.