RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=244363



Message


mark74 -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 4 2013 18:56:58)

Most people on here (including myself) are hobbyists who love flamenco, so don't feel insecure.

There are a few professional guitarists and music teachers or professors who contribute on this site also and some hardcore veteran aficionados, but I don't think anyone but a jerk would troll you just for pursuing your curiosity of a genre we all love

That said you'll see some friction here from time to time...but it wouldnt feel legitimately Latin without it[:D]




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 4 2013 19:02:00)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mark74

Most people on here (including myself) are hobbyists who love flamenco, so don't feel insecure.

There are a few professional guitarists and music teachers or professors who contribute on this site also and some hardcore veteran aficionados, but I don't think anyone but a jerk would troll you just for pursuing your curiosity of a genre we all love

That said you'll see some friction here from time to time...but it wouldnt feel legitimately Latin without it[:D]


Yeah, that's OK. I participate on a climbing forum where trolls are everywhere. I know my stuff there, so for me I can weed them out. Here, though, I'm swimming in dark seas. I have no idea if the surface is calm or not, so thanks for the heads up.

I'm not afraid of friction. In fact, I'm happier knowing folks are taking this seriously. I want to learn. So kudos. Can't wait to see how the next question resolves itself. [:D]




mark74 -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 4 2013 19:22:11)

So thats why Montoya gets so much respect?

I havent read much about this era, but it fascinates me. I've actually read a lot more about medieval Al-Andalus than I have about the actual history of flamenco in the 19th and 20th century




Mark2 -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 4 2013 21:02:33)

I'll go with #1 and it is a brilliant put on. I like the bit about guitarists just catching up now, but not there yet.
Imagine, the cejilla-the guitar hero game of it's day.......

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arash

two possibilities:
1) brilliant ironic post from mark which fooled me with the missing smilies
2) the golden age he is talking about must have been visited by paco using that "back to the future" DeLorean DMC-12 car (of course he didn't take his cejilla with him) ;)




mark indigo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 4 2013 21:43:09)

quote:

Where did you gather that from? Never heard it in my freakin life, and also disagree that this was truly the case.

Ricardo
you need to set your irony detectors to "numb"

quote:

are you guys serious or what .....
er.... no

quote:

two possibilities:
1) brilliant ironic post from mark which fooled me with the missing smilies
2) the golden age he is talking about must have been visited by paco using that "back to the future" DeLorean DMC-12 car (of course he didn't take his cejilla with him) ;)
oh yeah, I forgot to post some of these on the end there[:D][:D][;)][;)][8D][8D][:D][:D]




mark indigo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 4 2013 21:48:27)

quote:

Well, I got trolled then.
not really, I'm not trying to wind you (or anyone else) up, sort of just playing with the fact that so little is known about that era because there are no recordings and no one wrote about flamenco then, much less wrote flamenco down in notation..... which I even put in the middle of the post.... like, how could I (or anyone else) know all that stuff about an era that no one knows anything about?! [:D]




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 4 2013 21:58:55)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mark indigo

quote:

Well, I got trolled then.
not really, I'm not trying to wind you (or anyone else) up, sort of just playing with the fact that so little is known about that era because there are no recordings and no one wrote about flamenco then, much less wrote flamenco down in notation..... which I even put in the middle of the post.... like, how could I (or anyone else) know all that stuff about an era that no one knows anything about?! [:D]


I don't disagree with that, but there is a sizable part of history without record that we do feel as if we have a grasp on, so it's not impossible that there are some stories passed down.

Your joke seemed quite plausible based on what I've read and seen thus far in various publications / media, as did Howson's suggestion.

edited to add: bravo / ole![sm=Smiley Guitar.gif]




Miguel de Maria -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 5 2013 2:21:14)

Mark Indigo left out some stuff. It is speculated that the super-flamencos influenced Bach and actually wrote the famous Dm Toccata and Fugue usually attributed to him. Possibly they also wrote the Chaconne, considered by some the greatest piece of music ever composed. Even more impressively, they are known to have (by analyzing period tapestries) to have invented two-handed tapping over a hundred years before Eddie van Halen!




Leñador -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 5 2013 2:47:27)

quote:

Mark Indigo left out some stuff. It is speculated that the super-flamencos influenced Bach and actually wrote the famous Dm Toccata and Fugue usually attributed to him. Possibly they also wrote the Chaconne, considered by some the greatest piece of music ever composed. Even more impressively, they are known to have (by analyzing period tapestries) to have invented two-handed tapping over a hundred years before Eddie van Halen!

LOL You can't prove that they didn't!! [:D]




mark indigo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 5 2013 10:53:44)

quote:

It is speculated that the super-flamencos influenced Bach and actually wrote the famous Dm Toccata and Fugue usually attributed to him. Possibly they also wrote the Chaconne, considered by some the greatest piece of music ever composed.


They didn't write any of it, because they didn't actually read or write, but they used to improvise falsetas in that style way before Bach. Bach actually sent a team of transcribers to Jerez, Cadiz and Seville, who had to wear ludicrous disguises to infiltrate the close knit and highly secretive flamenco clans. They wrote down what they could, and Bach cobbled the bits together and came up with his wholly derivative and, frankly, dumbed down style as a result....


like I said, set your irony detectors to "numb"




mark74 -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 5 2013 15:09:55)

quote:

who had to wear ludicrous disguises to infiltrate the close knit and highly secretive flamenco clans.
they wore greasy mullets and scarves and Cordobes hats with red ribbons, but the fact that they kept showing up places on time started to make people suspicious




mark indigo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 5 2013 17:19:54)

[:D]




mark indigo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 6 2013 14:33:02)

quote:

So, I'm reading The Flamencos of Cadiz Bay right now and so far it's a great read. There's a lot of info packed in here, and I'm finding it to be exactly what I need. I also bought a couple of other books that I'm sure will raise some curiosities, too, so my plan for this thread is for folks to post cultural flamenco related questions that they may have. This site is mostly about musicians and chords and stuff (or so I gather), so hopefully this will help non-musicians find answers to other questions. I'm fully aware that in the early-going I'll be the only one asking.


sorry, I seem to have derailed your thread, what was the second question?




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 6 2013 14:55:42)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mark indigo


sorry, I seem to have derailed your thread, what was the second question?


Heh - no worries. I think I got the answer. Basically I'm reading something different from what the folks here seem to think. The fact that the answer depends on the source suggests that no one really knows (and Howson is pretty clear in suggesting this about Flamenco in general).

I will have more questions to add to the thread going forward. I look forward to the lively discussion. [:D]




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 7 2013 22:17:35)

OK, so we hammered the last one to death. Next question seems simple, and all internet searches seem to reveal the same answer except that I have seen a few different variations.

What cities make up the points of the flamenco triangle? It seems all sources I've read include Sevilla and Cadiz. Of course, most also say that Jerez is the other point, but this doesn't really make a lot of sense to me because a lot of flamenco can also be found in Malaga, Moron de la Frontera, and Grenada.

Howson suggests that it's Ronda, which could also form a nice triangle with just Jerez and Moron (which I've also read elsewhere - sorry, trying to find the source but can't at the moment - is more of a triangle of gypsies).

Of course there's the "Muslim Triangle" Cordoba, Granada, and Sevilla.

So OK, the topic here is less what the literature says is the flamenco triangle, but more what you think the flamenco triangle should be, both in terms of original and modern times, and why.




Morante -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 8 2013 14:16:48)

Historically, the flamenco triangle is Cádiz-Jerez-Sevilla. Lebrija and Utrera are closely related to Jerez and Sevilla.

Nowadays, the only place that counts for real flamenco is Jerez, while professional flamencos centre on Sevilla and Madrid, because that is where the contracts are made.

That you might find flamenco in other places is irrelevant. And if you think Howson is an authority on flamenco, think again.




Ricardo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 8 2013 17:27:57)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gmburns

OK, so we hammered the last one to death. Next question seems simple, and all internet searches seem to reveal the same answer except that I have seen a few different variations.

What cities make up the points of the flamenco triangle? It seems all sources I've read include Sevilla and Cadiz. Of course, most also say that Jerez is the other point, but this doesn't really make a lot of sense to me because a lot of flamenco can also be found in Malaga, Moron de la Frontera, and Grenada.

Howson suggests that it's Ronda, which could also form a nice triangle with just Jerez and Moron (which I've also read elsewhere - sorry, trying to find the source but can't at the moment - is more of a triangle of gypsies).

Of course there's the "Muslim Triangle" Cordoba, Granada, and Sevilla.

So OK, the topic here is less what the literature says is the flamenco triangle, but more what you think the flamenco triangle should be, both in terms of original and modern times, and why.


What the cante nerds are talking about is the development of the "important songs"...that being Solea, siguiriya, buleria, cantiñas. That's the "golden triangle" reference as those forms developed in Triana/sevilla, Jerez, and Cadiz. Of course the other towns or regions in Andalucia develped songs, but they are all derivative of one form, FANDANGO....those would be all the "levante" songs, sucha as malagueñas, Granadinas, Taranto, taranta etc all from the mina, ....and the mountain songs like Caña Polo Serrana, are very lyrical like levante songs but simply borrow the compas of Solea or siguiryas. So the nerds find the "core" of cante to be Solea and siguiriya (tona martinetes etc too), all found in that golden triangle.

Ricardo




gerundino63 -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 8 2013 18:10:58)

@ Ricardo,

Doesn't it get time to put all you know and written here in a book?
Unbelivable all the knowledge you have man!

( just to be sure,this is NOT ment sarcastic)

Peter.




mezzo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 8 2013 18:25:27)

quote:

Of course the other towns or regions in Andalucia develped songs, but they are all derivative of one form, FANDANGO....those would be all the "levante" songs, sucha as malagueñas, Granadinas, Taranto, taranta etc all from the mina,

Sorry to contradict the great authority here, but I think you're a little bit confuzed.
Cantes levantinos - mineros do not include Malaguena nor Granaina. At least it's the 1st time I heard this kind of mixture.




Ricardo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 8 2013 18:40:56)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mezzo

quote:

Of course the other towns or regions in Andalucia develped songs, but they are all derivative of one form, FANDANGO....those would be all the "levante" songs, sucha as malagueñas, Granadinas, Taranto, taranta etc all from the mina,

Sorry to contradict the great authority here, but I think you're a little bit confuzed.
Cantes levantinos - mineros does not include Malaguena nor Granaina. At least it's the 1st time I heard this kind of mixture.


Yes it does, and they are all pretty much the same form...the melodic details distinguish. If you could reduce em all to one key on the piano it would be easier to hear I guess. The guitar gives so much color...but yes malgueñas and granainias, often coupled together, musically, are same form as the cantes de la mina. Sort of super slow and super ornate elongated versions of fandangos, that make heavy use of the flat 7 in the melody to force the guitar to answer to tonos in a "oh I just gave you the V7 chord with my voice, now YOU give me the I on the guitar", way. Fandango minero, fandango de Lucena a lot like taranto family songs. Hence, in the old days you would hear songs like Malagueña by Chacon accompanied by Montoya in Taranta key, or Cartagenera (cante de la mina) accompanied in the Granaina key.

I guess it would be better to say they evolved out of those rhythmic abandolao/verdiales/Rondeña type songs which are basically slower fandangos too, but used those nice flat 7 intervals in the melody. Only odd thing is the free style thing evolved historically first for these guys than the "fandangos naturales" more based on the huelva form of fandangos (musically simpler without all the sub dominant accidentals). I would have thought the opposite would have happened.

Now a days it's easier for nerds to keep em all separated out by keys for the guitar and such, grouped together by towns or regions etc.

Ricardo




mezzo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 8 2013 18:52:48)

quote:

Yes it does, and they are all pretty much the same form

yes the same form but then why there are so much distinct variations.
The same you explained could fit also for Solea or Fandango (with compas) or for Verdiales...There are a lot of specifications going on and just thinking about all the solea variation, why bother to specify de Alcala, de Frijones, de Triana? If you could reduce them to the same key on a piano.

Btw it sounds weird for me to aknowledge that Malaguenas is a cante mineros, but I suppose it's due to my nerd attitude.




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 8 2013 23:50:40)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Morante

Historically, the flamenco triangle is Cádiz-Jerez-Sevilla. Lebrija and Utrera are closely related to Jerez and Sevilla.

Nowadays, the only place that counts for real flamenco is Jerez, while professional flamencos centre on Sevilla and Madrid, because that is where the contracts are made.

That you might find flamenco in other places is irrelevant. And if you think Howson is an authority on flamenco, think again.



I'm not assuming he is (part of the reason I'm posing questions here is to get different opinions), however he does seem to have somewhat of an idea.

But I am curious as to why you don't think I should consider him an authority.




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 8 2013 23:56:56)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo

quote:

ORIGINAL: gmburns

OK, so we hammered the last one to death. Next question seems simple, and all internet searches seem to reveal the same answer except that I have seen a few different variations.

What cities make up the points of the flamenco triangle? It seems all sources I've read include Sevilla and Cadiz. Of course, most also say that Jerez is the other point, but this doesn't really make a lot of sense to me because a lot of flamenco can also be found in Malaga, Moron de la Frontera, and Grenada.

Howson suggests that it's Ronda, which could also form a nice triangle with just Jerez and Moron (which I've also read elsewhere - sorry, trying to find the source but can't at the moment - is more of a triangle of gypsies).

Of course there's the "Muslim Triangle" Cordoba, Granada, and Sevilla.

So OK, the topic here is less what the literature says is the flamenco triangle, but more what you think the flamenco triangle should be, both in terms of original and modern times, and why.


What the cante nerds are talking about is the development of the "important songs"...that being Solea, siguiriya, buleria, cantiñas. That's the "golden triangle" reference as those forms developed in Triana/sevilla, Jerez, and Cadiz. Of course the other towns or regions in Andalucia develped songs, but they are all derivative of one form, FANDANGO....those would be all the "levante" songs, sucha as malagueñas, Granadinas, Taranto, taranta etc all from the mina, ....and the mountain songs like Caña Polo Serrana, are very lyrical like levante songs but simply borrow the compas of Solea or siguiryas. So the nerds find the "core" of cante to be Solea and siguiriya (tona martinetes etc too), all found in that golden triangle.

Ricardo



So I've read this, too and have a couple of follow-ups.

I've read that the Levantes comes from the Med coast and the mining communities. Are you saying a song from Cordoba is also a Levante because it doesn't come from the triangle, so to speak? Or are you saying that Levantes are a form of Fandango and Cordoba (?) and Malaga (Malaguenas - to some extent) essentially have their own variations?

And why is fandango so different from the Solearas, Bulieras, Seguiriyas, etc? Is it because fandango really comes from other forms of music and the flamenco fandangos are just adaptations of this?




Morante -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 9 2013 12:07:30)

quote:

But I am curious as to why you don't think I should consider him an authority.


I knew him.




BarkellWH -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 9 2013 12:47:22)

quote:

But I am curious as to why you don't think I should consider him an authority.



I knew him.


Zing!




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 9 2013 15:12:17)

OK.

At the very least the first book I'm on (Flamencos of Cadiz Bay) is a damn good read with interesting observations. I'm into it for sure, grain of salt and all that.




Ricardo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 9 2013 15:51:33)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mezzo

quote:

Yes it does, and they are all pretty much the same form

yes the same form but then why there are so much distinct variations.
The same you explained could fit also for Solea or Fandango (with compas) or for Verdiales...There are a lot of specifications going on and just thinking about all the solea variation, why bother to specify de Alcala, de Frijones, de Triana? If you could reduce them to the same key on a piano.

Btw it sounds weird for me to aknowledge that Malaguenas is a cante mineros, but I suppose it's due to my nerd attitude.


The variations are in the melody. The challange is to learn the variations and be able to identify and label them. If singers were more creative as before, there could be MORE variations and therefore more forms. INstead singers compose "songs" these days over buleria tangos or rumba rhythm bases....which aficionados don't consider "cante".

Solea all are based on a form. The levante songs all based on a form. I never said malagueñas are cante mineros, but both are under the umbrella of "levante".




Ricardo -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 9 2013 17:34:49)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gmburns

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo

quote:

ORIGINAL: gmburns

OK, so we hammered the last one to death. Next question seems simple, and all internet searches seem to reveal the same answer except that I have seen a few different variations.

What cities make up the points of the flamenco triangle? It seems all sources I've read include Sevilla and Cadiz. Of course, most also say that Jerez is the other point, but this doesn't really make a lot of sense to me because a lot of flamenco can also be found in Malaga, Moron de la Frontera, and Grenada.

Howson suggests that it's Ronda, which could also form a nice triangle with just Jerez and Moron (which I've also read elsewhere - sorry, trying to find the source but can't at the moment - is more of a triangle of gypsies).

Of course there's the "Muslim Triangle" Cordoba, Granada, and Sevilla.

So OK, the topic here is less what the literature says is the flamenco triangle, but more what you think the flamenco triangle should be, both in terms of original and modern times, and why.


What the cante nerds are talking about is the development of the "important songs"...that being Solea, siguiriya, buleria, cantiñas. That's the "golden triangle" reference as those forms developed in Triana/sevilla, Jerez, and Cadiz. Of course the other towns or regions in Andalucia develped songs, but they are all derivative of one form, FANDANGO....those would be all the "levante" songs, sucha as malagueñas, Granadinas, Taranto, taranta etc all from the mina, ....and the mountain songs like Caña Polo Serrana, are very lyrical like levante songs but simply borrow the compas of Solea or siguiryas. So the nerds find the "core" of cante to be Solea and siguiriya (tona martinetes etc too), all found in that golden triangle.

Ricardo



So I've read this, too and have a couple of follow-ups.

I've read that the Levantes comes from the Med coast and the mining communities. Are you saying a song from Cordoba is also a Levante because it doesn't come from the triangle, so to speak? Or are you saying that Levantes are a form of Fandango and Cordoba (?) and Malaga (Malaguenas - to some extent) essentially have their own variations?

And why is fandango so different from the Solearas, Bulieras, Seguiriyas, etc? Is it because fandango really comes from other forms of music and the flamenco fandangos are just adaptations of this?


Cordoba and Moron (for example) are considered guitar towns, so in a snobby way aficionados don't associate any special song or cante to those towns. The exceptions are songs like "Alegria de Cordoba", which is a song that borrows the compas of Alegrias but melodically has nada to do with the Cantiñas family of songs that has a simpler form or structure over which singers can mix and match and improvise letra arrangements. Alegria de Cordoba is a set song with a long letra...very different. But a nice exception.

The fandango de lucena is coming from very close to cordoba geografically, so in a sense yes it is levante from outside cordoba as it also sounds melodically more like Taranto than any fandango from huelva.

The form of fandango is very different than the form of Solea. The form of solea is very different than the form of siguiriyas. The form of Tientos is VERY similar to Solea. Tangos and bulerias too. So you can lump them together. Alegrias form very different than solea, only the compas is similar. Hard to generalize unless we get into specifics of the music and lyrics. Form of siguitirya and martinete and tona are very similar. ETc. That is how they lump things together. Sometimes aficionados use poetry of the letras to organize, but as a guitarist I prefer the music form to categorize.

Fandango in it's purest form comes from Huelva. In fact there are musicians that only perform fandangos there, and those musicians don't consider themselves "flamenco" musicians or singers. Same deal with sevillanas or rumba. So they are outside the flamenco family yet the flamenco musicians embrace those forms. Sort of like Jazz and blues. Jazz is a bigger umbrella, all jazz artists play blues....but are not BLUES musicians. Blues musicians are not Jazz musicians. Same type of distinctions.

The fandangos that evolved into free form (naturales its called) ARE considered flamenco, due to the creators of the unique melodies coming directly from flamenco singers. There is nobody on earth that can sing a good solea or siguiriyas that is NOT considered a cantaor or at least a FLAMENCO artist (cuz dancers and guitarists can sing too). So you can start to see why the golden triangle and solea/siguiriyas are so important.

Ricardo




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 9 2013 19:14:52)

OK, so really flamenco in a "pure" sense doesn't stretch west or north (fandango country, so to speak), so that takes care of Huelva and Cordoba. The fandangos there are more fandango than they are flamenco, even if there are influences on either side, if I get that correctly.

But what does this do for the fandangos to the south and east? I've read that rodena could be older than flamenco and also be a part of flamenco at the same time. Does this mix sort of keep Ronda out of the triangle then? I can imagine Malaga (city) being further removed as a result of this mix.

I get what you said above so no need to rehash, just trying to piece different parts together.




gmburns -> RE: Cultural Flamenco Questions Thread (Nov. 9 2013 19:45:30)

Dubious and probably futile attempt and trying to look smart:

Cante jondo (grande?): seguiriyas, soleares, bulerias, cana, martinete, etc.

Cante grande (intermedio?): malaguenas, mineras, tarantas, tientos (? = levantes = fandangos?)

Cante chico: alegrias, boleras, bulerias (?), fandangos (?), nanas, rodena, sevillanas, tangos, etc.

fandangos, sevillanas, rumbas (where do rumbas fit above?) may or may not be flamenco depending on where you sit.

Solea and Seguiriya seem to be the "pure" forms of flamenco.




Page: <<   <   1 [2] 3 4 5    >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET