Ricardo -> RE: nino de pura (Oct. 14 2005 8:57:57)
|
quote:
Banderas picado were nowhere near Canizares'es , i dont know recently but at that stage and in that concert Canizares picado stood out proabably even more then Paco's. I feel the opposite. Canizares was fast, but did not have the controlled sound the other guys had. And there was one fast rumba, where Banderas took it up a notch in his improv solo and played a much faster rhythm than the other guys were doing with the picado. You almost don't realize it because he is so laid back and in the groove. I will find the spot again, but pretty much it was like the other guys did 16th triplets, and Banderas did 32nds. Also, in Zyrab, there was a reason why the speedy trade off's were done by Banderas. I have seen them both with Paco live. Canizares missed notes sometimes, but Banderas was half asleep playing it. But we are splitting hairs here, like which GOD of the guitar is the boss. My point is this: A lot of folks that like flamenco guitar, have their own tastes or whatever, fine. But why say Paco is not so great? I mean it is fine to say you don't like his work or whatever, but you like "so and so" better or he PLAYS better than Paco? Just keep in mind the list of Paco's biggest fans: Tomatito, Moraito, V.Amigo, Nunez, Canizares, E. de Melchor, Cepero, Chicuelo, Nino Josele, Banderas, M. Sanlucar, J. Conde, Grisha, Todd, etc.......... Ricardo
|
|
|
|