Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
hello guys, I was working on a sycamore back and I used the jet plane so as to make it coplanar for bracing, and at the end I realized that the thinnest parts are 2 mm. I am worried because I've heard that back should not be too thin so as not to have the same resonant frequency of the top that finally results in lower sound.
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
This comes down to preference and experience. You should consider how you would like the back to work on your guitars too. I've seen them around 1.5mm and there are probably thinner backs out there too. There are also backs out there that are a lot thicker too.
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Stephen Eden)
Andres Marvi makes his back and sides at nearly 3mm when using brazilian. He prefers working with a stiff sound box and all the sound forced through the top.
Posts: 1708
Joined: Jan. 29 2012
From: Seattle, Washington, USA
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
That sounds good to me for a flamenco guitar. Mine are about 2.5 mm in the center and 2.0 at the edges. Once it's glued to the sides, the edges will be supported by the sides and no longer so flexible.
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
Sycamore has a very dead taptone and is structurally stable, so your 2mm near the edge could be reasonable. But it depends on how well the wood has been cut. If its quatersawn all the way across the width, it should be fine at 2mm at the edges, if its not, then 2mm will be to little.
Ahmed, you always look for the fast and easy answers and guitarmaking (and life) is not like that. It is impossible to give you a good answer without touching the wood.
Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
I agree with Anders, I would not use it, for a number of reasons. I would strongly encourage you Ahmed to change your attitude to building from a focus on how cheaply you can build to a pursuit of excellence. You will never manage to build a guitar cheaper than Asian factories can produce it. Choosing quality materials is part of the build process, as is being prepared to throw away a component you have cut wrongly, thinned excessively, or cracked when bending.
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Jeff Highland)
For the current moment I cannot go to expensive materials for also many reasons, I'm not sure to sell it for high price ,that's because cypress and Indian rosewood are not available in my country and I don't want to ship anything to me right now , I might use cypress and Indian rosewood but not now.
Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
I'm not talking about using expensive materials just defect free and appropriate cut, and having an attitude of striving for excellence rather than good enough.
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Jeff Highland)
but that was the wood available when I went to buy woods, I bought just two pieces for the back. Do you think I'd better search for a quarter sawn wood? also I don't use wood with cracks,when I was using paduk for another guitar and it cracked I didn't use it.
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
Ahmed, considering your situation I would try to find some high quality, locally sourced (alternative) woods for your guitar making. I honestly don't know if that's possible in Egypt but if you do some research and talk to wood workers you might be surprised.
Finding high quality wood (quartersawn, resonant, well dried/aged) is much more important than the type of wood you use, and a number of "alternative" species fit the bill just fine. If you source your materials locally they can often be cheap, even free.
Right now I'm building a guitar out of all North American woods: Cherry back and sides, Walnut neck, Hickory fingerboard, Englemann top and I've come to the realization that "tonewood" (e.g. you can only use Cypress and Rosewood) is a myth.
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Andy Culpepper)
And that is exactly what I am doing , I am governed by woods I find ,I even contacted with wood suppliers that import woods to Egypt, I am working on a flamenco blanca made of sycamore and IMO it is not bad at all then I will work on a classical made of paduk(I will buy new paduk sides), then after these I will decide what to do.
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
I have never used flatsawn wood in guitar building, and I hate the idea, but other people do. If am not mistaken, those high figured woods on steel string guitars are flatsawn. Not sure how problematic they are though. Still, get the best wood and tools you can!
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
Did a search on acoustic guitars built with Sycamore not many made with it but enough where I would not think twice about using it when you are first starting out. Looked at the picture of your wood, yes flat sawn. Much better if it was quarter sawn. Seems that you may not know why quarter sawn is the cut of choice. With humidity changes wood expands or contracts. There is more movement with a piece of wood that is flat sawn than a piece that is quarter sawn.
That being said I made some guitars out of Pine, the quarter sawn back on one cracked while another with flat sawn wood did not. Just goes to show that all wood is not equal. Or I built the flat sawn one when the humidity was low and it had a better chance of staying whole. But given a choice I would build with quarter sawn.
While I am still a new builder I did build an all Walnut guitar (steel string) out of some flat sawn wood. Just used it as I did not know if a Walnut top will sound any good so why waste good wood on an experiment. As luck had it the guitar sounded pretty decent and a year in it survived with no cracks. Recently I built another Pine guitar (nylon), it was just to be a quick build to try out some ideas. I really like how the neck turned out, will have to be real careful with it as it is made out of spruce.
With each guitar I learn something or try something new. They are not worth much but they did not cost me much either. These are my learning guitars, the better ones I will give away. I have a nice stack of wood to make guitars out of but am saving it for when I think I can do it justice (soon). I see no problem learning the skills in making a guitar with less desirable wood. There is enough things you need to learn to do right to build a guitar. I have been asked if I wanted to sell any of these and I declined because I do not want to set the value of guitars I build as low as what I can get for them. They are of value to me as learning tools.
It is up to you to decide what it is you are trying to achieve with the guitars you build. While you have been given some good advice in this forum sometimes you can get some value from coloring outside the lines.
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sep. 29 2009
From: Back in Boston
RE: How to determine the right thick... (in reply to Ahmed Flamenco)
A lot of companies use Sycamore for lower level flamenco guitars. Cordoba is one that comes to mind. The companies do not specify if the Sycamore is European (a maple) or American (a plane) but many look to have the European type. Most laminate the Sycamore--not sure if is due to economics or the properties of the wood. The wood database reports both types are fairly stable and have a t/r ratio of 1.7 and a tangential shrinkage in the low 8's.