Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
buleria74

 

Posts: 135
Joined: Jan. 23 2010
 

Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc 

Dear friends,

I was checking the Lester Devoe site, look at this quote from his site
regarding finishing: http://www.devoeguitars.com/guidlines_opinions.html


quote:

Sprayed Lacquer Finish:
This is the only finish I offer. I have not noticed a difference in tone from French polish. My finish is thinly applied and that is most important. A French polish finish will not make a poorly constructed guitar sound good; but any finish applied too thickly can deaden the sound of a well made guitar. I tint the lacquer amber on spruce top guitars. The color will fade with exposure to indirect ultraviolet light while the same light will naturally darken the spruce with a warm patina.


what is your opinion? specially our luthier friends.

_____________________________

Flamenco no tiene mas que un escuela, transmitir o no transmitir !
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 3 2010 7:14:05
 
kovachian

Posts: 506
Joined: Jan. 30 2008
From: Americanistan

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

I'm not a luthier, but I can still vouch for the appeal in lacquer. The lacquer on my Navarro was as thin as any expertly-done french polish that I've seen. I could actually see the waves in each individual grain of wood. On one tiny area that was chipped, you couldn't even see the edge of the finish, thinner than a sheet of paper.

What I cannot vouch for, is the long-term effects (aging, durability etc) of french polish because I've never owned a guitar with such a finish. I understand that lacquer is a bit more durable. I know that each type of finish has it's detractors and fans alike, but I currently don't place as much importance on one over the other. If I ever buy a french polish guitar, maybe I'll prefer one or the other or maybe not, who knows.

_____________________________

Don't look at me in that tone of voice.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 3 2010 9:21:47
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

De Voes guitars are finished with Nitro cellulose. Thats a good finish. What is not good IMHO is polyurethane (plastic) which is used on many also very expensive Spanish guitars.

I wont use nitro because of healt matters. Its very bad for your health and very inflamable.

With respect of long term, nityro will be stronger, less prone to dents etc than FP, but FP is A LOT easyer to fresh up and repair, so FP might win .

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 3 2010 9:47:39
 
HolyEvil

Posts: 1240
Joined: Nov. 6 2008
From: Sydney, Australia

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

hi anders. Just Checking with u. I think I read on another post that u mentioned nitrocellulose is the finish that deadens the soundboard the most?
If it is, then why would it be no 2 after FP for a guitar?

Cheers
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 3 2010 18:21:25
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to Anders Eliasson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anders Eliasson

With respect of long term, nityro will be stronger, less prone to dents etc than FP, but FP is A LOT easyer to fresh up and repair, so FP might win .

Anders,

Can you explain to me what makes FP easier to repair? I simply cannot see how repairing a scratch or dent would be easier with FP than with Nitro lacquer. I have virtually no experience using French polish and freely admit very little knowledge on the subject. Please share your expertise .

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 5 2010 10:03:51
 
aeolus

Posts: 765
Joined: Oct. 30 2009
From: Mier

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

It's interesting the differences of opinion on finishes. DeVoe's only finish offered is sprayed lacquer while Stephen Connor's standard finish is FP overall. As a note Connor's blancas go for about $1.5k over DeVoes. Given the number of fancy rosettes
Connor offers, I expect he likes to build guitars with a luxury finish rather than any perceived sonic improvement. But the proof is in the pudding as the image below testifies. This from a recent DeVoe newsletter.


Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 5 2010 11:32:19
 
el topo

Posts: 22
Joined: Oct. 24 2009
From: Mendocino, Ca.

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

Hi: I agonized for months over what finish to use on my current batch fo 4 guitars. After consulting with numerous finishers and builders, James Goodall convinced me that french polish was the only way to go on a fine classical or flamenco. James makes world class steel strings and lacquers them.
I chose to have mine french polished and am glad I did. A side by side comparison of a french polished guitar and a lacquered one will clearly demonstrate the beauty of french polish. Lacquer may be more durable but to get it thin eneough on a top for best sound, I doubt it will be more durable than fp.

_____________________________

Mira como son las cosas.
El clavel no tiene espinas.
La que tiene es la rosa!
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 5 2010 15:03:03
 
Sbu_01

Posts: 28
Joined: Jan. 28 2009
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

The ramirez shop used sprayed on lacquer during the 60's even on the primeras, so sometimes the finish became sticky like gum and obviously that wasnt good, so some would have to refinish the guitar, dont think this problem was too common but I could be wrong. Besides its Devoe if this was such a bad idea dont think he would be in business still.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 5 2010 20:03:55
 
buleria74

 

Posts: 135
Joined: Jan. 23 2010
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to el topo

quote:

I chose to have mine french polished and am glad I did. A side by side comparison of a french polished guitar and a lacquered one will clearly demonstrate the beauty of french polish. Lacquer may be more durable but to get it thin eneough on a top for best sound, I doubt it will be more durable than fp.


100% agreeing with you, FP is the best. I play on José Manuel Fernandez
guitars and they are all FP, the are monstrous in sound, they vibrate nicely
and the sound is perfectly clean and round.

_____________________________

Flamenco no tiene mas que un escuela, transmitir o no transmitir !
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 5 2010 21:51:52
 
Patrick

Posts: 1189
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Portland, Oregon

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

quote:

100% agreeing with you, FP is the best. I play on José Manuel Fernandez guitars and they are all FP, the are monstrous in sound, they vibrate nicely and the sound is perfectly clean and round.


So the assumption is, the French polish is why his guitars are so good? His building methods are of little consequence? I'm not trying to be a d..k. I just don't buy that French polish makes or breaks a good guitar.

I have owned two DeVoe’s and played others and they are all they are cracked up to be, lacquer and all. Some of the best guitars I have played were lacquered. On the other hand, I have owned several French polish guitars that were not close to a DeVoe.

Bottom line, it isn’t as mush the finish, as the guitar.

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 5 2010 22:23:08
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to HolyEvil

quote:

hi anders. Just Checking with u. I think I read on another post that u mentioned nitrocellulose is the finish that deadens the soundboard the most?
If it is, then why would it be no 2 after FP for a guitar?

Cheers


If I said so, I mixed up things, but are you sure. I like nitro finish if well done. Its thin and acoustically good

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 0:38:32
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

Patrick

The problem is that Lacquer means a lot of things. Nitro is a good finish, whereas polyurethane is something i would never put on a guitar.

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 0:40:12
 
buleria74

 

Posts: 135
Joined: Jan. 23 2010
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

quote:

I have owned two DeVoe’s and played others and they are all they are cracked up to be, lacquer and all. Some of the best guitars I have played were lacquered. On the other hand, I have owned several French polish guitars that were not close to a DeVoe.


Patcrick, I have never played on Devoe guitars but I trust in what you say,
they must be excellent guitars. however, I believe if his instruments were
FP they would sound even better, maybe not a huge difference but 5%-10%
imrovement in sound.

_____________________________

Flamenco no tiene mas que un escuela, transmitir o no transmitir !
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 4:02:07
 
kovachian

Posts: 506
Joined: Jan. 30 2008
From: Americanistan

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

quote:

5%-10%
imrovement in sound
What do you mean? What aspect of sound is being broken up here, and what are the units of measurement that you're using to describe this aspect?

I will never, ever understand this 'percentage' thing when describing sound. As far as I can tell, that's like saying the color red is 34% of blue, or that a pineapple is 71% more than a honeydew melon.



I'm not flaming anyone, I'm sorry, this is just a pet peeve of mine.

_____________________________

Don't look at me in that tone of voice.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 7:59:29
 
buleria74

 

Posts: 135
Joined: Jan. 23 2010
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to kovachian

quote:

What do you mean? What aspect of sound is being broken up here, and what are the units of measurement that you're using to describe this aspect?


we might have different understanding about how good a guitar sounds. I talk
percentage but maybe it's easier to say SLIGHTLY better instead of 5 to 10 %
then maybe it becomes clearer to you.

_____________________________

Flamenco no tiene mas que un escuela, transmitir o no transmitir !
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 8:13:25
 
kovachian

Posts: 506
Joined: Jan. 30 2008
From: Americanistan

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

Of course that's clearer, that's why I asked and it's how I describe subtle changes. I just wonder if people are trying to describe some other aspect I'm not aware of. It happens a lot in artistic mindsets so every once in a great long while, I have to come out and ask someone what they mean when they assign percentages and other concrete measurements to describe totally abstract things.

_____________________________

Don't look at me in that tone of voice.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 8:32:13
 
Patrick

Posts: 1189
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Portland, Oregon

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

quote:

Patcrick, I have never played on Devoe guitars but I trust in what you say,
they must be excellent guitars. however, I believe if his instruments were
FP they would sound even better, maybe not a huge difference but 5%-10%
imrovement in sound.


DeVoe has had some of his guiatars French polished and he says he can't tell the diifferance.

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 10:41:41
 
Patrick

Posts: 1189
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Portland, Oregon

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

quote:

The problem is that Lacquer means a lot of things. Nitro is a good finish, whereas polyurethane is something i would never put on a guitar.


That's a given. Poly to me is "plastic".

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 10:42:42
 
HemeolaMan

Posts: 1514
Joined: Jul. 13 2007
From: Chicago

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

poly is impossible to repair too. i stripped it off a guitar once. took hours with 60 grit orbital sander.

_____________________________

[signature][/signature]
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 15:39:58
 
kovachian

Posts: 506
Joined: Jan. 30 2008
From: Americanistan

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to buleria74

You were able to strip poly??? I'm surprised anyone bothers with that crap, even with the aid of power tools.

_____________________________

Don't look at me in that tone of voice.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 6 2010 15:42:37
 
krichards

Posts: 597
Joined: Jan. 14 2007
From: York, England

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to kovachian

What is this 'poly' you guys are talking about?

The water based lacquer from stewmac is a mixture of acrylic and urathane. LMI also produce something similar.

I've used the stewmac water based stuff on one guitar and it was very easy to use, gave a great looking finish and and the guitar sounded fine to me.

However it did have a definite plasticky feel to it.

I agree with Anders that the nitro is good but just too dangerous for small scale builders like me, so I always go back to French Polish. Its a pleasure to use and whatever goes wrong its so easy to repair it.

_____________________________

Kevin Richards

http://www.facebook.com/#!/kevin.richards.1048554
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 7 2010 0:51:57
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: Lester Devoe guitar finishing etc (in reply to krichards

quote:

ORIGINAL: krichards

I agree with Anders that the nitro is good but just too dangerous for small scale builders like me, so I always go back to French Polish. Its a pleasure to use and whatever goes wrong its so easy to repair it.


Proper ventilation and a respirator are definitely required for using lacquer (even water based in my opinion).

I asked Anders to explain why it's easier to make repairs with FP over nitro lacquer but he didn't answer yet. I think both finishes are just fine but still don't understand why it's easier to repair one over the other. I'm talking about a scratch or dent or crack. Perhaps he's saying it's easier to repair FP because there is no color added? To me that makes the flamenco guitar kind of bland looking (I like yellow or orange) but whatever turns your crank .

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 9 2010 15:54:43
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.0625 secs.