Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
|
Solea de Triana.. chords please
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login  | |
|
   
NormanKliman
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sep. 1 2007
|
 RE: Solea de Triana.. chords please (in reply to Anders Eliasson)
|
|
|
Here's a description of the styles that have unusual chord changes. All the chords and notes are for por arriba accompaniment, so be careful because some of the recordings on my site are por medio. I've put them into three categories. Only a few of these styles are still sung today.
First category: Soleás that change to G and/or C before the cambio. They all sound similar, with aires of cañas, polos, serranas and other ancient singing styles.
El Fillo 1: Second line of verse ends on G, third on C.
Silverio 1-2: Third line of verse C, fourth line of verse G (modulate with D7), ends with repetition of first and second line of verse like a normal cambio. A lot of singers know Silverio 2, and it's the style that usually trips us tocaores, maybe because of its similarity to another Triana soleá, José Lorente, which actually has no unusual chord changes.
Enrique Ortega: Similar to Silverio 1-2. First line of verse C, second line of verse G, take it from there like a normal cambio. You might run into an older singer who remembers this style.
José Yllanda 1: This one also goes to G (in the first line of verse), but it doesn't have much to do with the other soleás in this category (it's three-line verse and the others are four-liners). This style isn't at all popular. Similar aires are in the jaleos extremeños and the soleá Jerez anonymous.
Second category: Odd tones that you can try to match with the right chords. The terms fifth and second refer to the degrees (notes) of the E Phrygian scale, so flatted fifth is B flat (use C7) and sharped second is F sharp (use D7 or even B7). Two non-Triana styles are similar: Juaniquí 4 (flatted fifth) and La Serneta 3 (sharped second). Not many singers know any of these cantes.
José Yllanda 2: sharped second degree in conclusion (D7 or B7).
José Yllanda 3: flatted fifth in conclusion (C7).
Serneta 4: Flatted fifth throughout (C7).
Third category: The soleá attributed to Pinea uses normal chords but the lines of verse are linked together and the cambio comes up quickly. It's usually a three-liner, and when the first verse isn't repeated it's a very short cante. A lot of singers know this style.
_____________________________
Be here now.
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Oct. 18 2009 6:50:57
 |
|
NormanKliman
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sep. 1 2007
|
|
RE: Solea de Triana.. chords please (in reply to Anders Eliasson)
|
|
|
Hi guys,
Jason: "Verse" means both a single line and a group of lines, but I think of it as you do, as a stanza, and I've edited my post. It seems a lot more simple in Spanish, with the terms estrofa/copla/letra (stanza/verse), verso (line of verse) and tercio (sung line of verse), although sometimes in Spanish people don't clearly distinguish between tercio and verso. It can be really confusing talking about these things! For example, some cantes start with the second written line of verse, which makes it the first sung line, etc.
Anders: Yes, there's a lot of information (over 400 audio files of siguiriyas and soleás). It's important to be aware that not all of the styles have to be learned, because many have fallen into oblivion (like the soleá El Fillo 1), others were never popular (José Yllanda 1), some are particular to a certain artist and therefore not very popular (José Yllanda 2 and 3), and a few contain tiny differences that hardly warrant special attention (Pepe el de La Matrona's styles, for example).
I've heard many people complain that the Solers' system of classification takes into account too many obscure styles and tiny details. For example, Pierre Lefranc has a similar book with narrower criteria. It doesn't include styles that are based on fewer than three recordings, if I remember correctly. While a narrower scope is easier to understand (and makes the author look better), I think a broader scope contributes more to the art form. For example, the soleá El Fillo 1 is excellent, but as far as I know nobody has ever recorded it. There aren't that many "hidden gems" in the old recordings, but there are a few.
So about the overabundance of information, I'm very much in favor of keeping things as simple as possible, but I think it might sometimes be an advantage when you have to put some effort into understanding a really dense piece of research. The language itself is another matter though. Long flowery sentences turn me off right quick!
_____________________________
Be here now.
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Oct. 18 2009 23:22:54
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.078125 secs.
|
Printable Version
