Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





Soundhole size   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
mounirben

 

Posts: 43
Joined: Sep. 12 2013
 

Soundhole size 

Hello guys,

I just found that on Barbero plan (by lewis) the soundhole measures only 83mm, is that normal ? I heard that when the soundhole is small the basses will be good and vice versa meaning if the soundhole is big there will be more trebles, what is your opinion ?
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jul. 7 2015 3:37:46
 
Jeff Highland

 

Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia

RE: Soundhole size (in reply to mounirben

It's at the lower end of normal range. A smaller soundhole is one of the factors which will lower the air resonance but it is not really correct to generalize about it's effect on the strength of bass and treble.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jul. 7 2015 7:39:22
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: Soundhole size (in reply to mounirben

83 is small. I generally build around 86 - 87mm.

This is one of the subjects that has been discussed here and there many times. Both by persons who build guitars and also by those who build them in their head.
There hasn´t been a general consensus about anything on this subject.

I´ve tried different soundhole sizes and I have no comments on what will change if you change the size. On the other hand, I´ve never gone to extremes and have only worked within the 85 - 88mm range.

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jul. 7 2015 8:24:52
 
Jeff Highland

 

Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia

RE: Soundhole size (in reply to mounirben

I have gone down to 76mm, but only for a 7 string guitar where I was wanted to support the low B string. It worked, And I got a really solid response there.
IMHO there is no need to go small for a standard tuned guitar.
If you are building from an accurate plan I'd say go with it, there may be other factors in the design that work well with that soundhole size.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jul. 7 2015 9:53:01
 
Morante

 

Posts: 2184
Joined: Nov. 21 2010
 

RE: Soundhole size (in reply to mounirben

Don´t forget that you have to get your hand inside for future repairs
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jul. 7 2015 14:58:07
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.0625 secs.