Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
my rant of the year
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
rogeliocan
Posts: 811
Joined: Nov. 23 2009
From: Canada
|
my rant of the year
|
|
|
The internet is 80% junk. Searching flamenco guitar videos for the last month, the majority is crap, either poor/incomplete instruction or just not flamenco. Let alone having to see countless videos of 'what it's face'... bla bla bla bla bla bla.... And that is not just YouTube it is everywhere. Too much info is like not enough information, too much work to weed out the junk and in the end you just give up. We need to move up to Web 5.0, where all noise and **** gets filtered out and sent to a secondary web that I don't care to have the address. I guess the keyword is filtering, for now, a filter to cut some stuff out would be nice, hell it would be nice on this foro! I think I was being an optimist when I said 80% is junk. There, I am sure this is nothing new, but it's annoying. And I feel better now. Well, not really.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Sep. 10 2013 14:51:02
|
|
rogeliocan
Posts: 811
Joined: Nov. 23 2009
From: Canada
|
RE: my rant of the year (in reply to rogeliocan)
|
|
|
quote:
The internet is 80% junk. Searching flamenco guitar videos for the last month, the majority is crap, either poor/incomplete instruction or just not flamenco. Let alone having to see countless videos of 'what it's face'... bla bla bla bla bla bla.... And that is not just YouTube it is everywhere. Too much info is like not enough information, too much work to weed out the junk and in the end you just give up. We need to move up to Web 5.0, where all noise and **** gets filtered out and sent to a secondary web that I don't care to have the address. I got it. The answer is: Meta Data. With every post (applies to this foro too actually), the poster tags his reply that defines the type, obvious ones that come to mind and keep it simple, (subject related), (irrelevant comment), (comic remark), and the ever so popular (insulting remark). Then viewers would choose to focus on (subject related), or anything else to see the complete content. That right there would reduce the web content to 1% of it's size. I know... users would pick the wrong categories, but the owner of the thread or content could clean it up. Anyways, since this won't happen, I could rate it as both (subject) because it is possible, and (irrelevant comment) since it won't happen.... ahhh nothing is simple.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Oct. 19 2013 16:53:47
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.140625 secs.
|