Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





bridge height, one more time   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
El Burdo

 

Posts: 632
Joined: Sep. 8 2011
 

bridge height, one more time 

I attach a drawing of the bridge I intend to make. (I now draw stuff, thanks all who suggested doing it).

My Santos drawing wants 10mm saddle height and 8mm bridge height. I'd like to try it at 6mm and 8mm as those seem to be the most popular flamenco dimensions.

But, when I draw out the path of the string - so it doesn't bite against the exit edge of the tie block - it is, I assume, far too close to the top?

So I guess I have to bring the angle down, or raise the height of the tie block. It doesn't seem right to have a tie block as high as than the saddle so I 'll ditch that. And I can see no benefit to angle it down either.

Is it OK to put the string under duress at the leading edge of the tie block? i.e. having a gentle angle coming in, but a sharper angle coming out? Doesn't seem safe to me, unless you sell strings.

The only other choice is to lower the string holes at the back but anything less than 3mm seems a bit dangerous.

The bottom dome on the bridge will be bigger than it appears and I know you can dig into the bridge at the block, but can't see the point here. I'm using a 2mm dome and 1mm neck inclination. Though when I actually measure it expect something fully 'else' so probably won't cut the final height of the bridge until I can string it up.

Thnaks. God I wish there was a word, thnaks. I'd save hours....

Thanks

Jeff.



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Hello I'm a beginner. Please don't hurt me.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 7 2012 23:09:11
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: bridge height, one more time (in reply to El Burdo

You don't drill the string hole at an angle. It goes straight through. Putting an angle on the top of the tie block is a good idea in my opinion.

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 8 2012 0:27:17
 
Sean

Posts: 672
Joined: Jan. 20 2011
From: Canada

RE: bridge height, one more time (in reply to El Burdo

She will never fly won't tie properly and no break angle.
I found when starting out that most plans out there were very misleading when it came to bridges. Look at actual pictures of bridges it will help and don't draw your wings as an after thought. A 6mm tie block is not very strong when it has such a steep transition to only 2mm thick wings.
Think low tie block, thicker wings and straight holes

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 8 2012 4:55:32
 
El Burdo

 

Posts: 632
Joined: Sep. 8 2011
 

RE: bridge height, one more time (in reply to Sean

Sounds good.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 8 2012 15:30:36
 
El Burdo

 

Posts: 632
Joined: Sep. 8 2011
 

RE: bridge height, one more time (in reply to Sean

Sean - I did exactly what you suggested and started by looking at the bridge on my own guitar (a flamenco I made years ago as a one-off exactly along the lines of a Torres guitar but using cypress).

I realised that the break angle was reduced by almost 50% by the upwards force of the loop tie method. My bridge is going to be quite low so I decided to use the 12 hole method. I decided this by looking at some examples on this site. I have also angled the tie plate forward a bit - I think it reduces forces on the inside edge a bit, and looks nice too.

I suppose just tying a knot in the string and using the 6 hole bridge would be as good as the 12 hole method but not so pretty.

_____________________________

Hello I'm a beginner. Please don't hurt me.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 13 2012 22:46:26
 
Sr. Martins

Posts: 3079
Joined: Apr. 4 2011
 

RE: bridge height, one more time (in reply to El Burdo

I do it like this but without the ugly knots. A simple knot is enough (and a double knot on the high E):



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 14 2012 18:42:24
 
El Burdo

 

Posts: 632
Joined: Sep. 8 2011
 

RE: bridge height, one more time (in reply to Sr. Martins

To me that looks odd - the beads AND the knots is too much! If I'm not going to use the threaded method I'll just tie a knot!
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 14 2012 19:54:17
 
Sr. Martins

Posts: 3079
Joined: Apr. 4 2011
 

RE: bridge height, one more time (in reply to El Burdo

You can do without the beads but prepare to have the holes chewed up and lots of tuning inconsistencies as the holes get larger on the knot side.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 14 2012 21:14:36
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.046875 secs.