Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
|
RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'?
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
|
[Poll]
|
should Hemeola man be given back ' Fellow privilages' ?
|
| yes |
|
| no |
|
| dont care |
|
Total Votes : 24
|
|
(last vote on : Dec. 12 2007 1:11:56)
|
|
Login  | |
|
   
Ricardo
Posts: 14848
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
|
 RE: should Hemeola man be given back... (in reply to Adam)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ramparts
Well, maybe we should be a bit more intellectual; you never know what the lurkers want to hear, since they don't speak up and tell us! So I'm just gonna throw this out there: supermassive black holes at the center of active galactic nuclei. While I think it is now clear that AGNs evidencing broad hydrogen lines and those lacking such spectral features differ only in the angle at which they're situated relative to our line of sight, due to interstellar dust thick enough to absorb the vast intensity of light put out by the central black hole's accretion disk, but it still seems unclear precisely what the structure of such AGNs within a parsec is, particularly whether or not the dust is in the shape of a torus or otherwise.
Discuss 
Even without the dust problem, most active galaxies are REAL far away, I dont' think we can see detailed structure of black hole discs, or ever will with telescopes. My guess is that "supermassive black holes" are actually the combined result of mutliple objects, perhaps thousands, interacting (even colliding) in the center. Come to think of it, black holes sort of defy logic and physics (requiring a singularity), and possibly don't exist at all, so we could be talking here about the supermassive easter bunny at the center of quasars. 
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Dec. 11 2007 3:32:27
 |
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.046875 secs.
|
Printable Version
