Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





Almansa 413   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Product Reviews >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
mrstwinkle

 

Posts: 551
Joined: May 14 2017
 

Almansa 413 

Bought one of these for fifty quid off ebay. to use as a beater travel guitar - and I fancied having a cheapy blanca. Has a big cosmetic scratch down the front so a bit ugly. so review is aimed as someone wanting to start out with a beginner guitar or needs a 2nd travel instrument.

First impressions, not great. The tuners are just nasty, with rattly sticky mechanism. Not an expensive fix - as I like black rollers and would have swapped anyway, but factory ones are just bad. Other worrying point was the nasty plastic nut and saddle. The saddle was cut too thin for the slot so was at an odd angle because it was also WAY too high. Again, I swapped out with cheap Chinese bone for not much cash, but for a beginner this could be an issue.

The guitar I got had no golpeador - not sure if this is because second hand or if they sell some with or without?

More subjectively, the neck is too fat. Compared to by Valeriano Bernals, 2.4mm fatter most of the way (approx 10 percent). As it is a beater, I spokeshaved it down and relacquered the back of the neck. Now looks a bit crappy from the rear, but isn't annoying.

On the plus, I like the shape of the headstock and if it weren't for the big scratch would look quite nice I reckon. Not trying too hard to be modern.

So far, not great. But on the plus. It sounds pretty good for a cheap instrument. Reasonably well balanced sound for a blanca - not quite as bright as the Cordoba F7 and could be said to sound a bit old-school. Running my finger inside I can feel only 3 braces which is perhaps a little non standard.

Overall I'm happy i bought it but I got if for under an eighth normal new price and am happy to tinker. For a first guitar at RRP, my old Cordoba F7 would be a better bet.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Dec. 15 2018 9:50:04
 
Dudnote

Posts: 1805
Joined: Nov. 13 2007
 

RE: Almansa 413 (in reply to mrstwinkle

Thanks for the heads up. Always amusing to read a brutally honest review

quote:

ORIGINAL: mrstwinkle
On the plus, I like the shape of the headstock and .... It sounds pretty good for a cheap instrument.

Glad it wasn't all negative for you.

_____________________________

Ay compañerita de mi alma
tú ahora no me conoces.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Dec. 15 2018 12:43:54
 
mrstwinkle

 

Posts: 551
Joined: May 14 2017
 

RE: Almansa 413 (in reply to Dudnote

Thanks. It might come across as negative, but I don't set the point of reviews where no criticism is made.... As it stands, in the context of the price and that I don't mind tinkering, I'm very happy with it.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Dec. 15 2018 13:40:07
Guest

[Deleted] (in reply to mrstwinkle

[Deleted by Admins]
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 21 2019 8:23:58
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>Product Reviews >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.0625 secs.