Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.

Update cookies preferences




RE: bulerias questions   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: <<   <   1 [2]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
JasonM

Posts: 2096
Joined: Dec. 8 2005
From: Baltimore

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to norumba2

I think Ricardo said before that it's confusing to explain bulerias in all its rhythmic forms by saying, you can feel it this way or that, and that etc. but universally it is in 3/4. He is right. I do think it's nice to know the rhythmic variations or feels. But also how they translate back to something fundamental, the 3/4 meter. Doing it this way might allow you to see how it fits together.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 23 2015 19:52:11
 
Sr. Martins

Posts: 3079
Joined: Apr. 4 2011
 

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to JasonM

Yes, I agree that 3's or 6's are better to breakdown things instead of 12. The different "feels" or accents within a rhythmic pattern might not make sense if you just stuff it against the 12 beat cycle but the sum of those smaller chunks always come together.

Another example (not a lesson in how to count) is when you have a standard 12..3..6.8.10 etc being played with palmas/cajon and the guitar is playing full phrases in 6 without the remate on 10... but always comes back to a place where both the percussion and the guitar will do the remate on 10 and bang some compas away.

6+6=12, it doesn't have to be 6+5 (remate)+1 all the time for everyone. Another variation would be having 6+5+1 multiple times in a row, but again, the percussionist might be doing different accents, it just has to keep it's structure.

The same kind of maths applies to subdivision feels in general, 3/4=6/8.

_____________________________

"Ya no me conoce el sol, porque yo duermo de dia"
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 24 2015 2:31:10
 
norumba2

 

Posts: 37
Joined: May 20 2015
 

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to JasonM

interesting points on the subdivisions. ..because ive done so much odd meter stuff in my day, i find myself doing a lot of phrasing in 7 + 5 or 5 + 7 against two 6's...

_____________________________

guitar - oud- fretless guitar
http://www.norumba.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 24 2015 5:17:31

payaso

 

Posts: 85
Joined: Dec. 7 2014
 

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to JasonM

The Foro had a very interesting 10-page thread on the compás of buleriás in 2004 (initially titled ‘Todd’s latest Bulería’) in which Estela ‘Zata’ insisted that the fundamental structure of Bulerías (and not just the Jerez style) was binary. As an example of her analysis (contested by other members) this is from one of her many posts:

“All bulerías is structured on twos. If you prefer not to consider it that way for whatever reason, the structure is still there, and there's never any need to beat your foot...plenty of older guitarists beat 1-2, 4-5...some beat 12...some let their feet waggle nervously. None of this changes the nature of bulerías in any way. It's either useful to you or not, but there is no way to separate one bulería from another in this regard.

I think the only way to see the inner structure is to listen to many recorded bulerías beating twos straight through, never lapsing into 3s, 6s, or 12s. It's very exciting when you see the elegant simplicity of it all.”

As a singer, she said, in effect, that this realisation had been an epiphany. She was then commissioned to write a long thesis on the subject for the Peña in Jerez. It hadn’t been published at the time, but was going to be. Did that ever happen, and has anybody read it?
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 24 2015 11:59:44
 
Dudnote

Posts: 1805
Joined: Nov. 13 2007
 

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to norumba2

quote:

ORIGINAL: norumba2
interesting points on the subdivisions. ..because ive done so much odd meter stuff in my day, i find myself doing a lot of phrasing in 7 + 5 or 5 + 7 against two 6's...

Looks like another way to think of shifting the accent on 6. You could also shift by 1/2, so in your notation 6.5 + 5.5 or 5.5+6.5. Shifting 6 to 7 is very common in other palos (alegrias, SpB). For my simple brain sticking to a 2-2-2 feel makes it much easier to shift accents without having to do math to stay in compas. But shifting accents is like putting icing on a cake, if there's more icing than cake it could get revolting for some - but that's a matter of taste

_____________________________

Ay compañerita de mi alma
tú ahora no me conoces.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 24 2015 13:03:23
 
Ricardo

Posts: 15242
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to payaso

quote:

ORIGINAL: payaso

The Foro had a very interesting 10-page thread on the compás of buleriás in 2004 (initially titled ‘Todd’s latest Bulería’) in which Estela ‘Zata’ insisted that the fundamental structure of Bulerías (and not just the Jerez style) was binary. As an example of her analysis (contested by other members) this is from one of her many posts:

“All bulerías is structured on twos. If you prefer not to consider it that way for whatever reason, the structure is still there, and there's never any need to beat your foot...plenty of older guitarists beat 1-2, 4-5...some beat 12...some let their feet waggle nervously. None of this changes the nature of bulerías in any way. It's either useful to you or not, but there is no way to separate one bulería from another in this regard.

I think the only way to see the inner structure is to listen to many recorded bulerías beating twos straight through, never lapsing into 3s, 6s, or 12s. It's very exciting when you see the elegant simplicity of it all.”

As a singer, she said, in effect, that this realisation had been an epiphany. She was then commissioned to write a long thesis on the subject for the Peña in Jerez. It hadn’t been published at the time, but was going to be. Did that ever happen, and has anybody read it?


As long ago as that was you will find me responding same as here.... It's mother fing 3/4 she is talking about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Her response was "I never met a bpm...."

http://www.foroflamenco.com/tm.asp?m=10774&mpage=3&p=&tmode=1&smode=1&key=bpm

As you guys continue I'm off to bang my freaking head against a wall ....

Cheers

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 24 2015 15:32:27
 
JasonM

Posts: 2096
Joined: Dec. 8 2005
From: Baltimore

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to Ricardo

I never met Bpm. Certainly he is not speed. Tempo is not pulse... She had her own reality. Definitely entertaining.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 24 2015 19:40:09

payaso

 

Posts: 85
Joined: Dec. 7 2014
 

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to JasonM

I would hate to prompt Ricardo to injure himself. No head-banging needed.

Other people’s realities can be interesting even if weird, loopy or just wrong. Many of the world’s tragedies can be seen as resulting from people trying to force their realities on others. When somebody has such fiercely-held convictions, however strange or mistaken, it can be worthwhile (entertaining, even) trying to understand how they acquired them. More so if they seem to have some relevant experience to base them on.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 25 2015 9:19:13
 
Ricardo

Posts: 15242
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: bulerias questions (in reply to payaso

quote:

ORIGINAL: payaso

I would hate to prompt Ricardo to injure himself. No head-banging needed.

Other people’s realities can be interesting even if weird, loopy or just wrong. Many of the world’s tragedies can be seen as resulting from people trying to force their realities on others. When somebody has such fiercely-held convictions, however strange or mistaken, it can be worthwhile (entertaining, even) trying to understand how they acquired them. More so if they seem to have some relevant experience to base them on.


I totally agree different views are interesting. And even repetitive topics I don't have a problem with. The realization that 11 years later I find myself wrapped up in the same argument which boils down to basic math (2 vs 3 ) is more than frustrating. In the end it's the format and my own problem, don't mind me.

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jun. 25 2015 14:43:21
Page:   <<   <   1 [2]
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: <<   <   1 [2]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

6.323242E-02 secs.