Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
Recently I made a saddle from bone but the piece was thinner than the standard one. I thought it wasn't going to work because the saddle would be loose and angled but anyway I tried it just to hear how it sounded.
I found that I prefer the loose saddle. It doesnt touch any of the sides of the slot but I make sure that it is perpendicular to the bottom and parallel to the sides, I only have to push it with my fingers after I put new strings and it goes into that position effortlessly.
Ive been trying the other to saddles I have (tight fit) but this "loose" one sounds so much better, the notes are tighter, brighter, more defined.. Maybe thats because the bridge is working like in a mandolin/double bass/violin where there's nothing touching the saddle besides the bottom of it.
Forgot to mention.. by my uncientific tests (ear) after some swaping between the 3 saddles, I think that the saddle that doesnt touch any of the sides of the slot produces less bass, its a clear difference especially on the trebles.
just how loose is the saddle? does it stay up straight or does it get pushed froward by the string tension? if it does it could damage the bridge in the long run.
I wonder if the difference is because the thinner saddle creates a sharper break for the strings. More of a knife edge than a wider more rounded contact area.
_____________________________
It's not what they call you that matters, It's what you answer to.