Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
RE: Guitar Longevity
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
estebanana
Posts: 9354
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
|
RE: Guitar Longevity (in reply to cathulu)
|
|
|
quote:
If a guitar is made with properly cured wood, then there will be more sound variation depending on seasonal humidity changes than any anectodal changes from the guitar opening up. Even if wood is "seasoned" it continues to change. Just because wood reaches a point of stability which enables you to build a guitar with it does not mean the wood ceases to change. A hockey stick, a shovel, baseball glove, basketball net, fishing rod, pair of shoes, gloves, coat, skateboard wheels and guitars all "play in" with proper use. A guitar playing in is not much different than the fact that the valves and cylinders on a car seat themselves as the car breaks in. Guitars are just like every other object which get mechanical use, they break in. Wood is a malleable substance. When you take a sheet of wood 2.5 mm thick and subject it to mechanical forces like tension and release, prolonged stationary tension and the fact that wood continues to change density as it ages, the wood will continually adjust to mechanical forces created by natural drying and musicians' touch. It's just like the great guitarist Nigel Tufnel used to say: "Hear that? It's still going, we could go to lunch and come back and it would still be ringing." You just have to listen deeper, like Nigel.
_____________________________
https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 8 2010 14:40:25
|
|
cathulu
Posts: 950
Joined: Dec. 15 2006
From: Vancouver, Canukistan
|
RE: Guitar Longevity (in reply to Ron.M)
|
|
|
Yes, I do put myself out there sometimes! I take one for the team all the time and I am not afraid to fall on my sword. I am maybe nuts... PS very nice anecdote their Ron - funny that is my experience also! Look at Hemeola Man, paraphrased "I put it on the shelf and it seem tight, then when I play it loosens up and the sound changes". Hello, that is an anectodal experience that relys on the mind's interpretation does it not? The mind is a pretty tricky beast. I don't trust mine all of the time so why should I trust yours LOL. No offense meant there. I agree in the long term things might change, but that is going to take decades in my humble opinion. Lets see someone post up some scientific facts - and not regarding 450 year old violins, I think I can see something that old changing a bit. Lets talk about within a couple of years. By the sound of things, the change can happen within a couple of hours!!! If these studies are out there, well lets see them. Most of the science I have seen has been pretty poor, backyard experimenters with no careful controls to weed out other influences, no statistical analysis, that ultimately come away with nothing. Prove me wrong, I don't mind. I can change my opinion when I learn the facts, I would be quite happy to!
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 8 2010 21:42:46
|
|
Ron.M
Posts: 7051
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Scotland
|
RE: Guitar Longevity (in reply to HemeolaMan)
|
|
|
OK, accepted that wood under tension and regularly subjected to vibration and to other forces will possibly undergo changes at structural/molecular level over time..... How come these changes are always POSITIVE? Everyone always reports the guitar changing for the better. No one ever reports the guitar sounding WORSE. This seems a bit suspect in scientific terms surely? Also to say things like the guitar moulds itself into your style of playing due to the vibrations because wood is a natural, organic material is pseudo science IMO and appeals intuitively to people who like the advertising for "natural" herbal and organic skin care and health products. (Note: Curare and Hemlock are also "natural" products, but not too good for you despite being "natural" ) The experiment I outlined a few posts ago would at least come one step further into proving this one way or another. As I said, I'm sitting on the fence on this one. I simply don't know. I am inclined to believe that it is so, or at least something inexplicable is happening, only because I respect the opinion of the guitar builders here who are working with guitars day in day out for years and years. So you can't dismiss that. However, it would still be nice to subject this to experimental test and I'm sure everyone would be interested in the results. Everytime we understand what is really going on in a process, the more we have control over it....which surely must be of interest to the Luthiers? BTW. I have heard that if you keep a Yamaha in a vintage Conde case, then over the months the guitar will get better and better as it will absorb the "vibes" from the Conde which was kept in there for years and are slowly being released from the case lining, exercising a change at molecular level on the Yamaha. In a couple of years you won't know the guitar which will be enriched with pure sonorous timbric colours. However, the opposite is also true... NEVER store a quality guitar in a case which has previously housed a cheap guitar, or the good vibes will slowly be drawn out of the wood into the case lining to fill the negative energy gaps caused by the cheap guitar. cheers, Ron
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 9 2010 1:06:50
|
|
XXX
Posts: 4400
Joined: Apr. 14 2005
|
RE: Guitar Longevity (in reply to cathulu)
|
|
|
Yes, i am a masochist. quote:
ORIGINAL: cathulu It does not meet the test of logic and our common sense. Ron has given some great examples of that! Test of logic??? Id love to see just one. To RON: I said they MAY have different perception, not they will. Not everybody has the same quality of perception. Hence, say if someone doesnt notice a difference between "before" and "after", it may be because (i) he doesnt see it (ii) there is none or too few FOR HIM TO NOTICE. Using public poll would maximize the insecurities which would exist in ANY kind of poll that requires more than one participant (even among experts). On the other hand, nobody will say there is a difference, when he doesnt notice it. I mean, you have to watch your statement. In previous posts you said there are many variables (without giving reason how strong they interfere the judgment of a player btw), and questioned the ears of a musician, and now you want to make a popular poll I asked you why, if there are so many variables, you picked a guitar for much money, without even testing it before buying. Your theory of variables that mystically get in the way of perception is simply lacking and just assumption. Following things are fact: - A player is the best judge on the sound of a guitar, not some bystanders. - The more time and dedication a player puts in his guitar and perfecting his/its sound and sensibilizing for it, the better a judge he will be. - The guitar is subject to conditions that change its sound, that is true without any doubt, since the player, no matter how well he plays, will not be able to change the sound of a guitar. It can be tested, i repeat, by playing something that requires no technical ability at all. The question is not whether guitars open or not, it is more the question how strong environmental variables are (including the player who makes a top vibrate through his playing) and how much the wood is responsible for that, i.e. what would happen if the guitar had not been played at all and all other variables (except the wood) were constant.
_____________________________
Фламенко
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 10 2010 5:29:51
|
|
Ron.M
Posts: 7051
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Scotland
|
RE: Guitar Longevity (in reply to XXX)
|
|
|
Well Deniz, I would agree with a lot of your conclusions...especially the player being the best judge etc. For me personally, one little bit of improvement in technique vastly outweighs any guitar "tone"...but that's just me! A lot off fuss is made here about great guitars and stuff and quite frankly, I've tried great guitars, including some of the professionals' concert guitars and to be truthful, I was disappointed to find that I just sound exactly the same on their guitars as I do on my own. Maybe when you get to THEIR level, you can start splitting hairs. Their guitars certainly felt very comfortable to play as they were well worn in and they had played around with the string tension and saddle height over the years to get the feel just right. But apart from that there was nothing magical about them tone-wise or anything that made ME sound any better. I would be very happy with any guitar from any maker on this Forum. The most important thing about a Flamenco guitar for a student IMO is that it should FEEL right with a proper Flamenco string height and action. The reason I chose Anders is because I knew he was a genuine and sincere builder and understood Flamenco guitars and he was also offering his guitars at a very reasonable price and I wasn't in a hurry, so didn't mind waiting. Also he was located in the EU...so no import duty. I also feel happy about all the money going directly to the builder, rather than a shop taking it's (justified) cut for a "name" label which they have in stock. What I received was a properly built Flamenco guitar which sounded fine. What more could you want? If you gave the guitar to Tomatito or somebody it would sound amazing...so I have nothing to worry about except my own input. In fact when I showed it to a professional, shortly after I got it he asked me if I was interested in selling it. No matter if you have the most expensive Reyes in the world, if you can't keep compás, or have a lousy thumb technique, or sloppy picado or rasgueado, or no aire....it will still sound pretty crappy regardless... I was happy with the guitar when I got it and I'm still happy with it now. I was also happy with an inexpensive Bernal blanca I bought from Jim Opfer and I am still happy with it as well. There is nothing much I can criticize with the guitars, but PLENTY I can criticize about my own shortcomings. If I could play better it would vastly overwhelm any "opening up" effects by an order of magnitude. So that's how I see it. cheers, Ron
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 10 2010 8:15:54
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.09375 secs.
|