RE: string action (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - Lutherie: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=22
- - - RE: string action: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=64869



Message


koella -> RE: string action (May 19 2007 22:29:24)

I lowered till 3.2 mm
It still seems allright. I have to play nearer to the bridge to prevent too much buzzing. But it still is better then it was before the customizing job.

Tomorrow I'm gonna sand off some more.[8D]




Anders Eliasson -> RE: string action (May 20 2007 10:12:59)

That sounds good Koella. You are going to sound good now that you´re a bit more dirty[8D]

Ricardo. This with "cool" words very often mess up what we are talking about. So many people mix up the whole thing and in order to not sound stupid they use "cool" words.

I know that "stringheight above soundboard at the soundhole" doesn´t sound very cool, but we all know what we are talking about. I mean if you say: Wow dude, thats a cool guitar. It really has a cool sound, and a cool setup..... What does this say. Well tecnically nothing but maybe that the guy talking has had a good mixture of uppers and downers[8D]

The stringheight above soundboard is very delicate and few understand the factors.
If its to high, the guitar just doesnt feel flamenco. so it needs to be low. I´d say below 9mm or better around 8 mm at the bridge. But equally important is the height at the soundhole. Some guitars have the strings almost parrallel to the soundboard, but MANY have a difference of up to 2mm.... Well in this case you lower the bridge setup so much that at the soundhole it´ll have a max of 9mm. I personally dont like this kind of setup. When you place your thumb on the 6th string, its reference point, which is the 6th string AND the soundboard, changes all the time you move your right hand.

So what about going super low??? Not good. why? because you loose breakangle ovre the sadlle bone and you´ll start touching the soundboard when playing picado.
When the breakangle gets to low, the guitar sounds flimsy its pulsation gets weaker and it looses proyection. Its very comfortable playing rasgueados and golpes and thats why some guitars used for dance accompanying (spell?) are set up like that.

A lot of simple meassures used by guitarists are worthless. The famous cigarete rule, that a cigarete shouldn´t be able to pass underneath the 6th string at the bridge, is worthless, because it very often doesn´t look at breakangle and stringheight above soundboard at the soundhole. These "golden" rules are as most other "golden rules" way to simple and dont really say anything.

To make a bridge setup lower than 7mm at the bridge is like a luthier suicide[:o]. You´ll have absolutely no extra space to adjust if the guitar moves a bit with time. And trust me. They do. They also change setup when the temperature changes during the year. Here in Granada ít suddenly got hot and dry, and I´ve just installed summer saddles on all my guitars. They are around 0,6mm lower... Imagine having to do that with a guitar with a bridge setup lower than 7mm[X(]
Its one of the most difficult aspects of building a flamenco guitar and the biggest problem is that the guitars never come out the same even using the exact same setup in the jig you use for assembling the guitar. There are ALWAYS difference. Sometimes as much as 2mm. Its something I´ve asked a lot of luthiers about. And all of them have agreed that it happens when assembling the Spanish way.
Some luthiers have started doing seperate body and neck. This way you´ll have the chance to controll the whole neckangle thing better. Maybe I will do one day as well, but I still feel that the Spanish heel and heel block makes for the best connection between neck and body and my intuition tells me that its the most "vibrant" way of constructing a Spanish guitar.

Anders




Sherman -> RE: string action (May 20 2007 14:57:20)

I read your message Anders, and thanks for taking the time to inform us. I believe "simplicity" is a good thing and I have the feeling that you build in a manner which I can appreciate. I can understand what you write. Thanks a lot.
Sherman




Anders Eliasson -> RE: string action (May 20 2007 17:49:19)

No problem Sherman. I just try to take the mystical part out of something very tecnical. Its difficult enough the way it is[;)]




TANúñez -> RE: string action (May 21 2007 17:41:52)

quote:

Well in fact he makes classical guitars, but he made a few flamenco's.

You got me worried here Tom. You say luthiers can ruin the guitar.
In what way can they ruin them ?


Koella, by ruining I mean by shaving the fingerboard and re-fretting.[:D][:D][:D]

Just kidding man. I mean that the ones who aren't really familiar with the flamenco guitar may not do a good setup job or perhaps take too much off the fingerboard or bridge. Things like that.

They know the classical guitar well but not enough about the flamenco guitar to build a good one or even set one up properly. There's just so much more to the instrument than just the low action and cypress back and sides.

I have a friend who I sold a very good flamenco guitar to. He was very happy with it. He let another guy play it and the other guy told him it was setup all wrong. He knew a luthier who could set it up properly. The luthier, who builds classical guitars did something to the bridge, saddle and nut and the guitar buzzed too much and all the time no matter how it was played.

This luthier had no idea how a flamenco should be, and this guy's friend new little about flamenco. He was a classical guitarists. Why would you take the advise of a guy about your guitar if that guy doesn't know anything about the instrument or the music to begin with??? He just assumed since he was an amazing classical guitarist that he knew all about guitars.

Sorry to ramble on. This story makes me angry [:@]. The point I'm trying to make is be sure your luthier understands the flamenco guitar. It helps if he even plays flamenco.




wiseguy493 -> RE: string action (May 21 2007 18:19:03)

Sounds to me like the supposed "luthier" is not much of a luthier at all. I work on all kinds of guitars... classical, flamenco, electric, acoustic-steel string, archtops, doesn't matter.

I think if a luthier set up a guitar in any way that creating buzzing or other action problems, he's not much of a luthier. Beware that there are many luthiers out there who know very little about their craft and they are a disgrace to the ones who do good work.




Escribano -> RE: string action (May 21 2007 19:04:21)

Gitano specifications for flamenco guitar setup, heard once in Jerez:

1. String height above the soundboard at the bridge: 1 Marlboro will lie snuggly alongside the bridge beneath.
2. Width of the strings where you wanna play: the width of one packet of Marlboro.

[;)]




TANúñez -> RE: string action (May 21 2007 20:58:32)

quote:

1. String height above the soundboard at the bridge: 1 Marlboro will lie snuggly alongside the bridge beneath.
2. Width of the strings where you wanna play: the width of one packet of Marlboro.


Excellent advice. When in doubt, ask a Gitano[:)]




koella -> RE: string action (May 21 2007 21:57:59)

Tom, how can the shaving, nut, bridge and saddle be made so that the guitar keeps buzzing all the time ? Except for the strings being too low of course.




Taranto -> RE: string action (May 22 2007 9:46:48)

quote:

Excellent advice. When in doubt, ask a Gitano


Just have a pack of Marlboro handy and you are all set.




hhmusic -> RE: string action (May 22 2007 21:21:59)

just wanted to throw in my two cents, and to revive the earlier suggestion from Yuris Zeltins of having the trebles very slightly HIGHER than the basses, or at least flat across. this allows the trebles, which have less mass, to not buzz so much and 'splat' or die on the frets, and the basses, which have more mass and can sustain through some buzz, to be lower. if you don't want any buzzing in the basses, this may not be a good idea for you. but if you accept or even desire some, i've found this to be a superior set up. it allows for a louder and more projecting picado, but more importantly, it allows for a harder, sharper, louder, "ching-ier" down-stroke in rasgueado - instead of a splat. worth a try, even if it sounds bizarre to you; you might like it!




Anders Eliasson -> RE: string action (May 23 2007 9:12:39)

quote:

how can the shaving, nut, bridge and saddle be made so that the guitar keeps buzzing all the time ? Except for the strings being too low of course.


By working the fingerboard you work the whole neckangle issue and you can change the stringheight above soundboard. This is very critical on a flamenco and not so much on a classical. Thats why classical builders not working many flamencos, often make very beautifull and well sounding flamenco guitars with a wrong neckangle and a poor setup....
Thats why its best to use a luthier who knows what we are talking about




koella -> RE: string action (May 23 2007 12:14:52)

Thank you all guys. I really appreciate all the info given in this thread.[:)]




Anders Eliasson -> RE: string action (May 24 2007 9:51:59)

Thanks for thread Huub.

This is good general info for everyone....




Page: <<   <   1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET