XXX -> RE: Some guy playing ANTONIA (PdL) !!! (Apr. 1 2007 21:02:42)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bikhiyal On the other hand, i cant understand why the so called "flamenco purist" are so radical in their judgment. You cant say "this is not flamenco" just because you have another taste. Exactly, thats what im trying to say all the time: OK, you CAN have different tastes. Thats NO problem at all. But when you begin, to DEFINE what "is flamenco" and whats "non-flamenco", ONLY because it suits your personal, subjective taste, then this is simply wrong. In other words: if it is ok to do that, then flamenco is everything i like it to be. Somebody who dont likes Sabicas, could say then he is not flamenco. The point that you, Todd, mentioned was a different one though. We have to distinguish that: first there is this never ending and boring discussion of what is and what is not flamenco. As far as i understood you Todd, your main point was NOT that you claimed this is not flamenco. You say he plays it sloppy (in contrast to for example Jim, who said that he is technically amazing), and i would partially agree by saying: Ok, its not perfect. But i think you are misunderstanding Bikhyal and me, coz nobody said that it needs many notes to be good flamenco. Yes, compared to the Paco stuff it is "simple". Yes, the execution (as performance) of Antonia wasnt perfect, but as a composition, as a piece to play, it is way harder than the other one. Apart from that, i would not even dare to compare both performances because there are other factors, like recording quality, and the Antonia-guy being very unconcentrated, that effect it. @koella: You said "I'm no purist. But the PDL figure just showed how he got down the notes very well." I didnt understand that. I mean, what is wrong in being able to play many complex notes? @Ricardo: Olé! SOS! [:D]
|
|
|
|