|
legrec -> RE: Lets be negative (Feb. 8 2007 11:29:44)
|
quote:
A dead art form looks back to some kind of golden age and tries to preserve it.
I agree RobJe, but it's "only" 50% of the point IMO. Perhaps we can see the necessary counter-part of this reflexion :
A dead art form is looking for the future and forget it's past.
That's why there are debates, because of these "lower and upper" limit - one refers to the lower limit, and the other to the upper one... And also why it's so difficult to understand and act satisfyingly between tradition and modernity, in all human fields. We musn't stay too much in the past, but also we musn't look too far in the future...[;)]
This is "theory". I feel that practically, each human era or period is marked by a tendency to fall in one or the other grid of view. A majority of people are refering inconsciously to one or the other limit, according to the "spirit of the era". And my global opinion in this world (and i'm "only" 30) is that the second threat is today much more powerfull than the first.
And we seems to be in a "tomorow will be better, don't bother with the past" era. Capitalistic economy is giving the tempo here. It cant stop or even slow down. No matter we've got everything to live satisfyingly, we MUST raise the production and the consumption by 10% each year to be "well". And I suppose this general state of mind influence cultural and social thinking and behaviors.
One exemple among many is Japanese society, wich is often described abroad as a "perfect" combination between tradition and modernity, by "modern" journalists. Ask japanese people or just learn a little on the country and you will clearly see that it's rather a 10% tradition and 90% modernity "equilibrium"...Yes, there are old temples and people are still sleeping on futons or receiving a gift with both hands. But when it comes to "old" values of thinking and behavior (humility, patience, simplicity, hate of greed) most japanese folks will tell you these times are clearly over and forgotten.
Thus, the "decorum" of the past had been preserved, but some fundamental lessons of history have been broadly forgotten. For the sake of the future. At the global cost of the degradation of Japanese civilisation, IMO.
From my side, speaking of Benise music for exemple, one can tell me : "don't worry, it will die by itself" or "what's the point, he's making flamenco for non-afficionados, he's "popularizing" it". I will accept these points, relatively.
But will still think that in the end it deserves flamenco past AND future way more than that it serves it.
But i agree also that this it's not fully a "traditional/modern" debate, it's also an "artistic honesty / money,fame&glory" debate... But there are still some links, as perhaps one key debate of modern flamenco is the "massification of flamenco", by opening it to new genres and audiences and forgetting a little the "rawest" and hardest to hear or understand aspects of flamenco.
And that's a main point IMO of the traditional/modern debate : modernity seems to say "hey, be easy, everything must be accessible, fluid and fun. All that is hard to get by, painfully slow, and requires tons of patience and efforts is an old and boring thing". That's exactly Benise music "fundamentals", as far as I can see.
|
|
|
|
