RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=348341



Message


devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 8:43:00)

quote:

Very often the rhythm executed first at 4:06 is how that 5 stroke rasgueado is executed if you slow the recording down

He executed it wrong. He did not play a triplet. Instead he did straight four notes. Thats why it sounds like 5 stroke ras to you. Rhythm is math. He should either correct the notation or play as it is.

Anyhow, any reason why 5 stroke ras is executed like the first rhythm? How about Paco? I always thought 5 strokes should be evenly spaced.




Stu -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 10:09:04)

[&:][:D][:D][:D]

quote:

He executed it wrong. He did not play a triplet. Instead he did straight four notes. Thats why it sounds like 5 stroke ras to you. Rhythm is math. He should either correct the notation or play as it is.


Reminds me of an ancient quote I heard
'Knowing is a dangerous game'




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 11:27:50)

quote:

He executed it wrong. He did not play a triplet. Instead he did straight four notes. Thats why it sounds like 5 stroke ras to you. Rhythm is math. He should either correct the notation or play as it is.


Yep, you're right he played 1234 5 (not 123 45 as displayed). But I bet Ricardo meant how it sounds 1234 5 is how some 5 stroke ras are executed.




Ricardo -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 12:19:15)

quote:

ORIGINAL: silddx

quote:

He executed it wrong. He did not play a triplet. Instead he did straight four notes. Thats why it sounds like 5 stroke ras to you. Rhythm is math. He should either correct the notation or play as it is.


Yep, you're right he played 1234 5 (not 123 45 as displayed). But I bet Ricardo meant how it sounds 1234 5 is how some 5 stroke ras are executed.


I would love to know which universe you guys live in where a triplet followed by a note of ANY FREAKING KIND, is supposed to have a space between them????????

Anyway, every thing was executed properly, it is as I said it is in MANY CASES…not all.




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 12:37:55)

quote:

Yep, you're right he played 1234 5 (not 123 45 as displayed). But I bet Ricardo meant how it sounds 1234 5 is how some 5 stroke ras are executed.

I'll avoid this guy's youtube videos. Instead of quintuplet he brought in sextuplet where the 4th of the six beats is omitted. But he played as if the 5th beat was omitted. It's a big mistake.

quote:

I would love to know which universe you guys live in where a triplet followed by a note of ANY FREAKING KIND, is supposed to have a space between them????????

For example a sextuplet where the 4th of the six beats is omitted.




Stu -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 12:45:07)

[:@]arghhhh my eyes!!!




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 12:54:07)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stu

[:@]arghhhh my eyes!!!

1234 5. You see space between 4 & 5? There must be another beat or note. Overall we have 6 beats - a sextuplet.




Stu -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 12:56:11)

quote:

He executed it wrong. He did not play a triplet. Instead he did straight four notes. Thats why it sounds like 5 stroke ras to you. Rhythm is math. He should either correct the notation or play as it is.


Sorry, you're flat wrong. He played it exactly right.
Emojis and joke comments aside. You are wrong. Not the video




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 13:11:47)

quote:

I would love to know which universe you guys live in where a triplet followed by a note of ANY FREAKING KIND, is supposed to have a space between them????????

Anyway, every thing was executed properly, it is as I said it is in MANY CASES…not all.


Ahh, thanks for that. See, I 'know' naff all really. Every day is a school day. I wonder if DH will recant.




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 13:14:42)

quote:

1234 5. You see space between 4 & 5? There must be another beat or note. Overall we have 6 beats - a sextuplet.


Did you see a rest in there? No you did not.

Question. Do all notes ever need to be evenly spaced as if by a computer?




Stu -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 13:37:41)

quote:

1234 5. You see space between 4 & 5? There must be another beat or note. Overall we have 6 beats - a sextuplet.


1^2^3^4_5_

123 are all part of the triplet. So share the same time value
The 4 and 5 are not. so share a different time value.

But the time value only comes after each note is played. So naturally the 4 will come immediately after the 3 because the time value of the 3 is that of one note in the triplet. Then the space will feel big between the 4 and 5.

I'm not great at explaining this stuff with only text on internet forum. And my terminology probably leaves a bit to be desired.

But it's being played Right. You are hearing it Right. But you are understanding it Wrong.




Ricardo -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 14:45:10)

quote:

ORIGINAL: devilhand

quote:

Yep, you're right he played 1234 5 (not 123 45 as displayed). But I bet Ricardo meant how it sounds 1234 5 is how some 5 stroke ras are executed.

I'll avoid this guy's youtube videos. Instead of quintuplet he brought in sextuplet where the 4th of the six beats is omitted. But he played as if the 5th beat was omitted. It's a big mistake.

quote:

I would love to know which universe you guys live in where a triplet followed by a note of ANY FREAKING KIND, is supposed to have a space between them????????

For example a sextuplet where the 4th of the six beats is omitted.


You have no clue what you are talking about. There were no spaces or rests in the examples discussed. You just don’t understand rhythm subdivisions correctly and need a teacher to help. This is a similar problem like when you thought the rumba pattern (tresillos) was equivalent to (or “close enough” to) quarter note triplets or whatever. You need much more basic training before you start asserting what you believe is right or wrong instruction by those far advanced of your level.




Ricardo -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 14:47:33)

quote:

Question. Do all notes ever need to be evenly spaced as if by a computer?


If you consider the difference between quantization and “swing” then simply YES. Because technically you can program the swing into a computer notation too, it is all just math. Basically whatever happens the human player goal should be CONTROL, not hit or miss. For example a deliberate and controlled speed up means you place your subdivisions earlier than they should be if you want a solid tempo.




AndresK -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 16:19:25)

In traditional Greek music we have many songs and dances in 7/8 ,9/8, 5/8, even some 10/8 . Traditional musicians teach those using words with the equivalent amount of syllables as in the video. They use fruits and nut names for this and it can also apply to subdivisions of course. This is quite useful actually as there are dances in 7/8 that group the 8ths as 2-2-3 and others as 3-2-2 with completely different feel and phrasing.




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 16:59:14)

quote:

Sorry, you're flat wrong. He played it exactly right.
Emojis and joke comments aside. You are wrong. Not the video

Looks like Stu is in devilhand mode. I like it.




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 17:04:13)

quote:

ORIGINAL: silddx

quote:

1234 5. You see space between 4 & 5? There must be another beat or note. Overall we have 6 beats - a sextuplet.


Did you see a rest in there? No you did not.


quote:


1^2^3^4_5_

123 are all part of the triplet. So share the same time value
The 4 and 5 are not. so share a different time value.

But the time value only comes after each note is played. So naturally the 4 will come immediately after the 3 because the time value of the 3 is that of one note in the triplet. Then the space will feel big between the 4 and 5.

I'm not great at explaining this stuff with only text on internet forum. And my terminology probably leaves a bit to be desired.

But it's being played Right. You are hearing it Right. But you are understanding it Wrong.

123 and 5 have the same note value. 4 has two times more note value than other notes because it took up the value of the omitted beat.

You can put rest after 4 but this guy played it without rest.
If there was a rest, all notes 12345 would have the same note value. A rest would represent the omitted beat or note between 4 and 5.




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 17:09:58)

quote:

You have no clue what you are talking about. There were no spaces or rests in the examples discussed.

I do know what I'm talking about. I mentioned space or rest to explain this basic stuff.




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 17:41:56)

quote:


quote:

Question. Do all notes ever need to be evenly spaced as if by a computer?


If you consider the difference between quantization and “swing” then simply YES. Because technically you can program the swing into a computer notation too, it is all just math. Basically whatever happens the human player goal should be CONTROL, not hit or miss. For example a deliberate and controlled speed up means you place your subdivisions earlier than they should be if you want a solid tempo.


Thanks Ricardo.




Stu -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 17:55:00)

quote:

123 and 5 have the same note value. 4 has two times more note value than other notes because it took up the value of the omitted beat.

You can put rest after 4 but this guy played it without rest.
If there was a rest, all notes 12345 would have the same note value. A rest would represent the omitted beat or note.


Pissed off with myself. I fell for it. 😒




kitarist -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 18:21:40)

quote:

123 and 5 have the same note value


No, 5's time value is 50% longer than 1,2, or 3. 5 is not part of a triplet, unlike 1,2, and 3 which, together, form one.

I don't know why this stuff is hard. Just subdivide time into units till you can assign nice integer units to the shortest note and get it. For example, let's that whole figure be 12 time units long; first half, with the triplet, is therefore 6 total, and each 1,2, or 3 note (of equal time value between themselves) gets a length of 2 units. 2*3 = 6. The second half, also 6 units long, has, instead two notes of equal time value. Therefore they are 3 units each, 3+3 = 6. So you see, the time value of 5 is 50% longer than the length of 1,2, or 3.

One would think you would recognise that pattern, being into flamenco:
1&2&3&4&a5&а

You now, 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 ...




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 18:22:35)

The guy in the video explains it all anyway at 3:28.

It's a quintuplet played as a triplet of 16ths followed by two straight 16ths, giving a slight space, a feeling of deceleration. It's still a quintuplet, but divided unevenly.

I can't do a slight space on here but that's why it feels 1234<insert tiny space>5<insert tiny space>.

No doubt someone will tell me this is b*llocks.




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 18:42:29)

Erm, so hang on, is this a nested tuplet used to create accelerando and ritardando within the main tuplet?




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 19:08:31)

quote:

No, 5's time value is 50% longer than 1,2, or 3.

5s time value is the same as that of 123 when we hear it.

Let me explain why.
The whole thing lasts 12 seconds. 12 is randomly taken so that people get what I mean.
2 2 2 4 2 this is how it sounds.
His notation is 2 2 4 2 2.

Starting point is to subdivide a beat evenly into small beats. In this example into 6 subbeats. Every subbeat lasts 2 seconds. 2 2 2 2 2 2.
As we see his notation can't be a quintuplet. It's a sextuplet.
Hope it's clear now.




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 19:29:08)

quote:

5s time value is the same as that of 123 when we hear it.

Let me explain why.
The whole thing lasts 12 seconds. 12 is randomly taken so that people get what I mean.
2 2 2 4 2 this is how it sounds.
His notation is 2 2 4 2 2.

Starting point is to subdivide a beat evenly into small beats. In this example into 6 subbeats. Every subbeat lasts 2 seconds. 2 2 2 2 2 2.
As we see his notation can't be a quintuplet. It's a sextuplet.
Hope it's clear now.


Dev, can you deconstruct this for me please? And what would be the time signature?



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 19:39:01)

It's 5/4 time. The first one is half Note (2 quarter notes). The last part is a triplet. Must be 3 quarter notes (a quarter note triplet). The first 2 quarter notes equal 16th note quintuplet and the 3rd quarter note equals 16th note sextuplet.

As I mentioned a quarter note can be four, five,six, and seven 16th notes. But not eight 16th notes because 2 quarter notes equal eight 16th notes.




Romerito -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 19:44:55)

The quarter notes are beamed as a triplet.

The half notes get two beats. The beamed triplet gets three beats in the space of two.

It is 4/4.




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 19:48:13)

You're right. It's a quarter note triplet which can be a half Note or 2 straight quarter notes.

The tricky part is 2 straight quarter notes can be a quarter note triplet. I hate polyrhythm.




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 20:03:28)

quote:

I hate polyrhythm.


It's not polyrhythm.




devilhand -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 20:15:22)

Of course it's not. But I wrote above 2 straight quarter notes can be a quarter note triplet. That means they both can be played at the same time. It would be 2:3 or 3:2 polyrhythm.




silddx -> RE: Five sixteenth notes beamed together (Aug. 24 2023 20:22:33)

quote:

Of course it's not. But I wrote above 2 straight quarter notes can be a quarter note triplet. That means they both can be played at the same time. It would be 2:3 or 3:2 polyrhythm.


I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Don't worry, it's me, I'm a beginner. Are you able to explain it in simpler terms?




Page: <<   <   1 [2] 3    >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET