Ruphus -> RE: At the doorstep to a new epoch? (Mar. 29 2011 14:01:33)
|
Muchachos, I believe if attempt to communcation was fully appreciated, grammar wouldn´t be mattering as much as it does to some of you. File me as incapable or weird or whatever and cut me a sclack. I doubt that anyone couldn´t spare the extra minute to read and `decipher´, nor that the topics were too insignificant to do so. If you think so however, just ignore me. Just looking at the ridiculous points that Rogeliocan picked on as claimed prove for unintelligibility, makes his attitude pretty lucid. * comment deleted by author [8D] .. Unlike Ron, Stu and others. quote:
ORIGINAL: Ron.M Hey Ruph man... Can you explain that again in plain English por favor? I can't follow anything you're saying. cheers, Ron I think to see changes going on with common sense, and am asking around whether fellow people are sensing such too. And am interested to know what exactly they observe as changing and what they consider as most needed changes for a chance of omitting the Big Crunch ( total break down of earths vital system ). quote:
ORIGINAL: marrow3 Would you envision survival under sustaining pharaonic systems, and if, how so at current worldly happenings? This is the exam question from hell surely? Pharoahs Cameron and Clegg are off the map of worldly happenings. Only the particular ancient formal appearance of pharaos is off the map, not however the corresponding economical and societal reign, privilege and power. Just as with the historical example, there do exist a couple hundred of extremely privileged and powerful individuals today who stand above legislation and governing. They can and do settle beyond public interest and reason, clamping in fellow men and environment for ordinary and endless encrease of their affluent personal property. And shaping common sense to their special needs through tweaked informative education and media. ( With great ease! Just consider the public influence and faked credibility of above mentioned organisations and the actually very small number of representating heads behind it. Geore Bush sen. about the "Marshall Institute" [ founded 1984 by Reagen for PR strategies for the irrational star wars concept SDI, and afterwards sustained for further environmental desinformation]: "My scientists". Or Bush junior who turned down Kyoto for petro industy´s lobbying brand "Global Climate Coalition" input. To name the very least of common manipulation.) quote:
ORIGINAL: marrow3 Do you sense common cognitive changes around you? The evil of tax evasion combined with cuts to hard working people appears to unite people more than foreign wars could or future climate change could. Yes. The problem is a disconnected perception ( through detouched culture ) that allows realisation almost exclusively and very late at trivial level of personal empirics. And even that only when entirely obvious. That upside-down way temporary phenomenons like current form of votivs, economics, states etc. are paradoxly considered before primare circumstances like the lasting of environnment. The lack of foresight and of realized coherence appears to be the main threat to the blue planet, as these deficits are delaying perception of urging status quo and preserving measures for life on earth. quote:
ORIGINAL: marrow3 And if there are paradigm changes developing fast enough to get around the Big Crunch: 'live within your means' both financially and environmentally True for now, seeing what reduction of animal protein in daily supply alone could do. Or support of local productions / distribution, reduction of packaging etc.pp. However, sacrifice in living standard would be considerably less than what is currently being suggested, provided a coming switch from oligarchy to actual democracy and with that introduction of community orientated developments / strategies of reason. quote:
ORIGINAL: marrow3 What kind of changes would you anticipate as possibly most relevant modification towards survival ( and possibly a world of reason and ethics, provided consideration of such as concrete matter )? Changing society with respect to climate change and carbon emissions now and not later. To me this seems a short sight; as it considers symptom before foregoing cause. After all pollution is a symptom of irresponsibility in diverse stages. Making out the practical background of overpopulation, ample chemical emissions, and inane concepts like nuclear energy, cutting down rain forest for oil palms as fuel ressource etc. ... Circling in insanity and tracking down its practical source should be a rather causal and constructive proceed. If people under fundamentally same reign could do something timely about climate change and carbon emissions ( which you can´t, as has been plentifully proven since about fourty years by now ), the source of irrational past and action would still be in place, keeping up irresponsible and unsocial layouts of vertical economizing. If people are at progressively overthinking ( as it seems ), I think we should take the opportunity to illuminate things on deeper levels. Starting from the very bases, going from there with the paramter of equal right among humans and for fellow creature, it should become clear that pollution and thoughtless destruction is the traditional breath of a minority privilege of pathological greed, that would stay in place still, if common focus remained on dealing with dominon´s secondary products. Ruphus
|
|
|
|