Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





[Deleted]   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
Guest

[Deleted] 

[Deleted by Admins]

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 10 2007 19:55:29
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14855
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: solxbul (in reply to Guest

quote:

A sung solea at a faster(closer to) bulerias tempo is not the same as a buleria sung slower(closer to) a solea tempo.


That is absolutely right. To me they are totally different melodies, even if you use the same lyrics. That is another thing people don't understand. The poetry has the rhythm in there too, and you can sing the same 3 line poem as solea, solea por bulerias, or Bulerias.

But melodically, that is the distinction for me, and the point that the singer you worked with was trying to make to the dancer. Also there is the problem I have run into where how many letras there are going to be. When the singer singes the second letra "macho" with the high notes, it should be obvious that the solea por bulerias stuff is over. But I have seen MANY dancers that don't know any better or don't appreciate that and after a bit of a llamada look over like "wheres my third letra????".

When it comes to defining the terms, at least when there is dancing, there is a lot of "mixing" going on so it is hard to learn that way. Again, we are talking about the abstract names for "songs" that simply are what they are whatever you want to call them or the dance as a whole. The other day there was a substitute singer that was really just a dancer. She did not know or feel comfy singing Solxbul for the dancer, so she sang Bamberas! To me Solea, Soleares, Solea por Bulerias, bulerias por solea, you are sort of splitting hairs with terminology. Solea de Jerez or Solea de Cadiz Solea de Alcala,etc is alot more specific.

OK Question for you Romerito. On Tauromagia there is essentially a guitar solo "De Capote". There is no palo name given by the composer. There is a bit of cante on it. So what would YOU call it? Solea. Solea por Medio. Solea por bulerias. Bulerias por solea??

Ricardo
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 10 2007 20:49:22
Guest

[Deleted] (in reply to Ricardo

[Deleted by Admins]

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 10 2007 21:33:20
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14855
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: solxbul (in reply to Guest

Solxbul is just fine with me. Sanlucar did not put ANY form names on purpose, since he was "creating" new things for certain forms like estribillos, and also he wanted the whole thing to be like a big "concept" album.

Anyway, guitar wise, he could play the same stuff he plays here for a singer that was singing just normal Solea. Just he would probably slow it down a bit. Not saying he would did or should, just that he COULD, and it would be totally acceptable to call it "Solea" or "Solea por medio" for the guitar mined folk. (understanding that he is playing the "correct" chords for the singer of course!).

Anyway, the letra "de triana traigo niña quien me compra...." etc, would be the defining factor of what to call the form. But honestly, I am not familar with where that comes from, the melody, if it traditional or not. I am only familiar with this exact version or "vengo niña..." versions, which I had always assumed others were doing BECAUSE of this version. Meaning I thought it was Sanlucar's creation.

Anyone familiar with an earlier version of this letra? That would settle the proper name issue. Regardless, as an accompanist, I know what to play when I hear it sung.

Ricardo
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 10 2007 22:34:48
 
Doitsujin

Posts: 5078
Joined: Apr. 10 2005
 

RE: solxbul (in reply to Guest

Solxbul whats that? Correct would be Solea::Buleria...
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 11 2007 21:07:36
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14855
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: solxbul (in reply to Doitsujin

quote:

Solxbul whats that? Correct would be Solea::Buleria...


Thanks Doit, correct us on our spelling and grammer!
Just teasing, I love your funny sounding comments, and they make perfect sense to me, but always funny.

2x2=4
Dos por Dos igual quatro.
X=por. Sol is short for Soleares or Solea. Bul is short for Bulerias.
solxbul=Solea por bulerias.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 12 2007 2:41:05
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.046875 secs.