Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
I've just been looking at some stuff from RNE's great collection..."Rito y Geografia del Toque." The styles are so diverse that it would make Sean's question about rasgueado quite meaningless IMO...
It made me think that you've got great players like.. Paco de Lucia Manolo Sanlucar Tomatito... etc.. Who all play with visually tidy and with very economic hand movements.
And others like...
Sabicas Vincente Amigo Serranito...etc
Who don't play with such "tidy" hand movements but still get out some amazing stuff!
So can you imagine one group trying to teach the other technically in a so called "Masterclass"?
Jeez, most of the time Sabicas just plays "free note" thumb.. (Which is totally "wrong" of course... )
I wasn't meaning it was a foolish question Sean... It's just when you see so many ways of more or less achieving the same thing, it makes your mind boggle as to which is the "correct" way.
I guess the rule is "if it sounds good..it's right!"
I was just kidding. I know what you mean. Many ways to achieve the same end. Through this though, I often look for the common element that may or may not be present in disparate styles. For instance, in this case the goal for me is a particular crisp, articulated sound that I hear a lot of players achieve. Assuming all have similar 'flamenco sounding' guitars and all arrive at the a similar sound ... what element of their technique is providing this. In fact, having so many players (as you have watched) doing various loose vs tight vs wild vs controlled techniques helps narrow down that one commonality that I could focus on because I think it is lacking in mine. It might be overall speed, position, angle, you know.
Like picado, you have vicente, PDL and nunez. All rather different in approach. But one common element imight be playing near the bridge. Another coordination. Another string crossing. They may share these techniques within their various approaches.
But more importantly, how is "Rito y Geografia del Toque" ? I have been considering it as a present to myself at some point. I can only imagine it is great. What about for someone like myself who only has limited spanish?
Sean
PS ... "if it sounds good ... it's right". Totally agree. But when "it sounds wrong ... it's wrong" and then what? That's when I looking so closely at what's going on. I don't have time to try N combinations or just make it look the same without knowing what I am shooting for.
ORIGINAL: seanm Through this though, I often look for the common element that may or may not be present in disparate styles.
I think thats the key. Why does it sound good? Why do they all sound flamenco? Once you know the answers to those questions it makes the troubleshooting easier.
quote:
.......PS ... "if it sounds good ... it's right". Totally agree. But when "it sounds wrong ... it's wrong" and then what? That's when I looking so closely at what's going on. I don't have time to try N combinations or just make it look the same without knowing what I am shooting for.
I am not sure there's a quick way around the experimentation bit Sean, as you have to give different techniques time to see if they work for you before you discard them. I think this is one of the reasons flamenco takes so long to get competent at.
If you don't know what your are shooting for, then I cannot see how you can progress. Either you hear in your mind the sound you want to make and continually adapt your tech to make your sound closer and closer, or you have someone else providing the feedback and guiding you. With no clear goal you are never going to get there - because you don't know where 'there' is.
I do think that when you are stuck and cannot see improvement with a particular tech after some time, getting a second opinion can be invaluable. Obviously a teacher would be good for this feedback, but Ron's suggestion of a video seems like a good idea to me. Why not get yourself a cheapy webcam?
Sean, just practice it stacatto--you can't go wrong! :)
Ron, maybe the _music_ is the common element here (secondarily, rhythm). The one thing these guys all have in common is a crystal clear conception of the music and the rhythm, and an unyielding desire to push toward that goal. How their body looks while they do it is strictly secondary in this case. I wonder how many amateurs or less-skilled players can say that their conception of the music is quite so clear.
Who don't play with such "tidy" hand movements but still get out some amazing stuff!
So can you imagine one group trying to teach the other technically in a so called "Masterclass"?
Jeez, most of the time Sabicas just plays "free note" thumb.. (Which is totally "wrong" of course... )
I agree with you about Amigo's "dancing" and Sabicas's thumb, but I think Serranito's right hand technique doesn't differ much from Sanlucar's or Paco's. I have all TVE - "Tesoros de la guitarra flamenca" documentaries, including Serranito's and I must disagree with you. He went over the top very often, but his hand position was/is very good.