Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva, Tom Blackshear and Sean O'Brien who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
Posts: 16347
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
RE: Faucher's Videos of Gerardo Núñez (in reply to machopicasso)
These are from his private collection so since he loaded these excerpts himself that is all he wanted to share. You could write to him and ask him if he has digitized them all, maybe he would share with you?
RE: Faucher's Videos of Gerardo Núñez (in reply to Ricardo)
quote:
These are from his private collection so since he loaded these excerpts himself that is all he wanted to share. You could write to him and ask him if he has digitized them all, maybe he would share with you?
I may give that a shot once things settle down a bit. I'll report back if I do.
Any idea why Faucher didn't transcribe Vol. 2 of "El Arte de Gerardo Núñez"?
Posts: 16347
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
RE: Faucher's Videos of Gerardo Núñez (in reply to machopicasso)
quote:
Any idea why Faucher didn't transcribe Vol. 2 of "El Arte de Gerardo Núñez"?
My feeling was Gerardo's wife was always very strongly against filming at the curso, and this extended to Gerardo's playing career. I remember a story where she asked to see someone's high 8 camera that had filmed Gerardo and she opened the thing for the tape then pulled it out and unrolled/destroyed it.
So as you can imagine, the fact Faucher filmed him in the hotel there to make a book for sale was problematic. When royalties started dripping in super slowly Gerardo (or his wife?) accused him of not being honest and a large part of the community of guitar players (knowing Faucher used to sell hand written tabs under the table anyway) chose to blackball Faucher (in their own way). The result was at the time Faucher was trying to do these legit publications (Tomatito Melchor, N. Ricardo etc.) the Paco de Lucia book failed to manifest via Paco's family estate (Ramon wanting to start controlling the brand around the same time the Carrillo guitars appeared and the "Conde" gravina was asked to stop marketing his model).
So this guy Jorge Berges was asked to do the Paco book, also a student of Nuñez, so he was asked to do that vol. 2 as well at the same time the first Paco books appeared on the market. It was a shame for two reasons:
1.Flamencos did not understand how royalties work and what the true market for partituras is.
2. Faucher does exceptional work and Berges versions are horrible.
Another reason for drama with Faucher was because he drops clues to catch plagiarizing and caught Encuentro in the act (I can confirm a copied mistake of Nuñez buleria for example) and Faucher called them in Switzerland to cuss them out. So he got a bad reputation that spread throughout the community. Oh well. At least for a brief time Nuñez could sell his transcription books at the curso and keep all the money (vol. 2 only). But to say it has problems is an understatement.
Printable Version
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread