Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
How important is the 4-Finger Rasqueo in your playing? Some of the source material/books I'm using only mention it in passing and is never used after that (Re. G-M's Method Vol 1, pg 18). While other books use it quite extensively (Re. Juan Martin's, Solo Flamencos).
Is there a normal and acceptable way to substitute a 3-Finger Rasqueo for a 4-Finger?
Posts: 3532
Joined: Oct. 20 2003
From: Phoenix, AZ
RE: 3-Finger v 4-Finger Rasqueo (in reply to Gecko)
Gecko, 4-finger rasgueado can never never NEVER be substituted for 3 finger!
Just joking, of course. The answer is that they can be substituted when appropriate. Who gets to decide when it's appropriate? YOU! My advice is to listen to guys you like and do what they do...or not. There are no rules.
The 3-finger (amii) tends to be tighter and obviously is easier to fit into faster tempos. The 4 finger (xamii) has a more developed, complex sound. It might work better in slow tempos. Although I like 4 finger myself because it has a more interesting sound.
Posts: 3532
Joined: Oct. 20 2003
From: Phoenix, AZ
RE: 3-Finger v 4-Finger Rasqueo (in reply to Gecko)
Yes sir.
Keep in mind that there is a variation for the 3-stroker, which is usually amii, that is ixam In other words, start with a downstroke with i then follow with xam. Juan Serrano does this. It feels even more awkward than other rasgueados, but is tremendously effective, perhaps even superior to the amii.