Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
off subject recuerdos
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
rickm
Posts: 446
Joined: Jan. 23 2004
|
off subject recuerdos
|
|
|
off the subject of flamenco but related to guitar. I have tried to play recuerdos for about 5 yrs. I have excellent teachers who are impressed with my progress, but I am still not happy. I have played it staccato, slowly, as fast as I can, just played the chords to get used to the fast changes, just played the trem, etc etc. In short about every different combination you can think of. I have even played it with a flamenco trem p,i,a,m,i as opposed to the classical trem of p, a, m, i it calls for and it still falls apart. I can play it fairly respectable until I get around 120 and then either the trem starts to become uneven or I cant make the chords changes cleanly. I try and play this song at least once a day and it has become standard for me no matter what else I practice to end the day with one effort at it. I have tried playing it extremely slow as in melancholy and as fast as I possible can caution to the wind and the result is typically the same. I know the initial thought is to keep at it at some point it will come, and perhaps I have reached the limit of my artistry with this tune, but I can play other trem pieces faster and cleaner, as in luminosa or almoradi. it is this particular tune that seems to be a nemesis.. I have even avoided it for two weeks and when Icome back the same result. Any of the excellent players here have the same problem with a particular song? I would think for all I have played it that it would be flawlesss. And its not just me, when I tape it , I can hear the errors so its not that Im being a perfectionist or whatever. Any comments are appreciated. thanks.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Sep. 20 2005 14:18:33
|
|
Jon Boyes
Posts: 1377
Joined: Jul. 10 2003
|
RE: off subject recuerdos (in reply to rickm)
|
|
|
quote:
I know the initial thought is to keep at it at some point it will come, Actually thats not my initial thought at all. I think its a common mistake to keep banging away at something for ages (and boy is five years a long time!) in the hope that someday it will work out. Think about what you are doing - everyday you finish your practice with your unhappy rendition of this. Everyday you are repeating the same errors and grinding all those mistakes into your subconcious. You are rigidly practicing your mistakes, but also finishing your practice session on something that is presently out of your reach, that you know you can't play yet. Neither of these things are good. I won't bother with the usual tremolo tips/exercises, you obviously know all this and IMO its not what you need. Give it a rest! leave it for a while (months) and end your prac sessions on something you play that makes you feel happy. Keep you trem chops up with something else. Lots of guitarists feel they reach plateaus in their technique, and find it had to get to the next level with things. My view is that the moment when things suddenly move up a gear is when something very subtle changes. You might not be aware of what that is, but as soon as you body feels what it likes to do that different thing that works, you better be paying attention because remembering that sensation is the key to improvement. Improvement is, by definition, change. Think about it. PS When you come back to it, try a different edition (different fingering) this will help too as you will have to concentrate and won't fall into those habits as easily. Stanley Yates used to give away a good one on his site. Also, if you don't already, practice the pice without the tremolo so you can nail the fingering ie play it all with just one note in the melody - PiPiPi get it? But only after a long break! PPS Ron, just read your post but I've just typed all this and couldn't be bothered to edit!
_____________________________
Spanish Guitarist in Devon, Cornwall and Somerset
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Sep. 20 2005 15:45:12
|
|
Miguel de Maria
Posts: 3532
Joined: Oct. 20 2003
From: Phoenix, AZ
|
RE: off subject recuerdos (in reply to rickm)
|
|
|
I agree with Jon--hammering away at this like you have is a terrible waste of time. There are a few issues here... first, how good are you? This is not a beginner piece, but fairly advanced. It is a tremolo study, but it requires a decently fluid left hand, one that is quicker and lighter than what a typical flamenco falseta requires. If you are having problems with the LH part, it has nothing to do with the piece, but with your LH in general. I think intermediate flamenco players underestimate the LH demands of the tyical classical piece (I'm not talking about Carulli or some kind 1st pos. etude either). My LH lagged behind my RH for quite a few years, in fact as long as I played predominantly flamenco. I have learned a few decent classical pieces (Recuerdos, Capricho Arabe, Pachelbel's Canon) and over time my LH has improved a lot. Once again, hammering away at one piece will not help. I did this for 2 years with picado and it didn't work. You might try the LH exercises in Pumpng Nylon, do them slow and with full perception. Over time your LH will feel a lot different, the fingers will gain independence and you will see that this piece is really not particularly difficult in the LH. As far as the tremolo, when you say 120, that is way too fast for this piece, which is marked Andante I believe in my version. It is supposed to be walking speed, leisurely and romantic like a walk through the beautiful grounds of the Generalife or the Alhambra (imagien the tourists not being there), not a machine gun like vibration. Those are 32nd notes, there. There is a way to help your tremolo which has nothing to do with the exercises of the common wisdom. That is, put all four fingers on the string--pami, and play them all at once--like one big finger. You will notice after doing this a bit the sensation involved, it is similiar to grabbing a cup or something. In daily life our fingers always work in concert, not seperately as we do in guitar. Now play one repetition of tremolo. Then play the big figner again. There is a way to play the tremolo where it feels like the big finger--but you _delay_ the other fingers. 4 strokes, one motion. Don't worry about moving your fingers fast, just move them slow--slower than the big finger. This is hard to explain but if you try it a bit you might catch what I am saying.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Sep. 20 2005 23:23:54
|
|
Jon Boyes
Posts: 1377
Joined: Jul. 10 2003
|
RE: off subject recuerdos (in reply to Miguel de Maria)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Miguel de Maria As far as the tremolo, when you say 120, that is way too fast for this piece, which is marked Andante I believe in my version. Aha, a common but logical misunderstanding this. You are right Mike about the written tempo of RDLA, but I will bet that the OP is describing just the tremolo. One times PAMI per beat at 120bpm, get it? In other words, the thumb plays on each beat of the metronome. This is usually the easiest way for discussing trem speed. In which case, he's actually playing it too slow, classical tremolo needs to be at about 140 minimum for it to sound fluid and to maintain the illusion of a continuous melody line. Half of 140 is 70, which is in Andante territory and which is how RDLA is scored
_____________________________
Spanish Guitarist in Devon, Cornwall and Somerset
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Sep. 21 2005 8:39:00
|
|
rickm
Posts: 446
Joined: Jan. 23 2004
|
RE: off subject recuerdos (in reply to rickm)
|
|
|
Miguel, I appreciate the closing comments and thanks for your input , I agree, ending on a "high note" is a time worn phrase, but an apt one. Sincerly that is demonstravily the best way, again, I do have reasons to play it at the end, which are sincere, perhaps by practicing it cleaner at the end of the day is better and saving the big effor tfor an initial practice time would be better. It is a frustrating piece and Ihave heard it described as a life time piece, even though I know some play it if not easier , certainly shorter than a lifetime. I am kind of a stumblefingered old guy, but enjoy the challenge and dont plan on giving up. Excuse my frustration. If it was easy I wouldnt attempt it. This inquiry has given me ideas and confirmed some of my efforts and re enforced the idea this list is comprised of good people who are willing to share effot and idea at every level. IT was a worthwhile endeavor. thanks again to all
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Sep. 24 2005 2:02:27
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.078125 secs.
|