Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





Fine luthiery; how is it done?   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

Fine luthiery; how is it done? 

I remember a handmade classical luthier guitar in the display window of music store of a small German town, sometime in the late seventies.
It was labelled with 5000 DM, something I hadn´t seen before, making me so curious that I had to just go in there and kindly ask whether I may give it a try.
Disappointing, that thing couldn´t even compete with my good old Aira guitar ( a specimen with clearly classical attributes, wanting to be a flamenca just by its golpeador ). Apparrently, the maker and the shop thought they were entitled to a crazy price level, just because the dud was handmade.

That experience together with a Hohner guitar, made me dismiss German luthiery altogether, until decades later when I learnt to gradually accept reality about fine German luthiery like from Hauser & co. And took even longer to update me on fine luthiery from France, North-America, Italy, Yugoslavia you name it ... even Japan, Korea, now China and meanwhile prepared to see great builts from pretty everywhere.
( Allegedly, even where I´m now. Gotta explore on it yet.)

Anyway, as posted I received a flamenco guitar from Lester DeVoe recently, which surpassed most of my expectations without words.
It delights me in all regards ( except maybe weight. It resides in the lower region of light category ).
Corresponding to real life experience and recordings great responsiveness seems to be achieved by many reknown ( and likely lesser known ) luthiers today. Depth of tone appears not to be all too scarce either.
What I consider to be still relatively rare could be classical guitars either of the very romantic type, or of a clay-like brilliance ( as I call it ) in the way of Hauser, which might mostly occure with specimesn of certain makers whose price range seems to start beyond ~ 10 grands. Maybe similar with extreme dynamic range, which must be another demanding challenge of the craft.

And then there is what I estimate not too common property as well, like with the DeVoe; which would be not only surprising simultaneity of both, strong fundamental and overtones, but captivating precise harmonic align of second partial and overtones to the fundamental.
... Evenly with each and every note, mind you!

I am interested to hear how a maker might be proceding to purposefully achieve such.

More even as it must be hard to forsee / calculate such subtle yet significant attribute, until having things ready and stringed.
No?

Ruphus
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 28 2011 18:40:33
 
DoctorX2k2

 

Posts: 211
Joined: Jun. 14 2006
From: Quebec City, Canada

RE: Fine luthiery; how is it done? (in reply to Ruphus

I have no idea how they do it... There are sooooo many factors acting on each other. I'm pretty sure it's impossible to isolate and weight their contribution to the final product. I had seen videos of Ervin Somogyi about tap tuning and how you can play around some parameters to get more/less bass, trebles, projection, volume, etc. but I think luck is involved at first to build a balanced product.

A little bit unrelated... but your post made me think about Fabio Zontini's cardboard guitar (Torres replica) :
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 28 2011 19:45:17
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: Fine luthiery; how is it done? (in reply to Ruphus

Thank you, Doctor,

I quite tried to view that video, but couldn´t get around census. Will try again.
I am curious how B&S of cardboard can do, if only layered dense and stiff enough, I guess.

For accuracy I got to correct myself on this:
quote:

... Evenly with each and every note, mind you!

There exist a couple of wolftones, eventhough with exactly harmonic overtones as mentioned above, quickly decaying together with their fundamental. Most prominently with "C ( and lesser with "A# and "D# ).
Not really dead notes, but considerably shorter relatively to the rest.
They are little noticable with all the covering up through sympathetic resonation. Sticking out only when sympathetic vibrations are muted.
Their tails must be cancelled by the strong main air of the instrument ( which must be E, if I pin-point that correctly ).
Something increasingly occuring the more responsive guitars get.

About overtones harmony:

Just tested my best classical guitar. Eventhough its intonation being highly accurate, its overtones are not nearly on spot like with the DeVoe.

Seems as if this kind of accuracy was bound to the constructions own tune. ... Maybe determined by main air precisely pitched to its note?
Thinking of it, I like to speculate like that.
No matter which main air, if you can hit it as closely as possible to the corresponding standard frequency of the note ... bingo!
If you get that done, all other notes will have their overtones and sympathetic company in line too.
Together with other of most desired sound / playability properties, you´ll have a killer instrument holding the unconsciously perceived secret of perfect harmony as icing on the cake.

Correct me if I´m wrong.

Ruphus
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 29 2011 0:09:08
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: Fine luthiery; how is it done? (in reply to Ruphus

Just saw the video.
That is a very nice sounding instrument!

Visually just like a wooden corpus. With the paper having soaked laquer through who knows how many layers, it might be counting for more than just cardboard. Maybe towards resin in Torres´times and "poly-x" reinforcement with Zontini´s built?
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 29 2011 0:28:33
 
DoctorX2k2

 

Posts: 211
Joined: Jun. 14 2006
From: Quebec City, Canada

RE: Fine luthiery; how is it done? (in reply to Ruphus

My Italian is rusty... but from what I understand, here are the specs :
Scale : 645
Top : VERY thin spruce top. 0.7 to 1.5mm
Sides : 0.9mm cardboard
Back : 2 layers of 0.9mm cardboard (1.8mm)
Bracings and kerfing : cedar
Neck : cedar

It doesn't really say anything about the finish or reinforcement (other than pieces of cedar).

The idea was to prove that you can build great sounding guitars with modest materials. To me, it seems obvious that the top is what matters the most.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 29 2011 1:06:45
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: Fine luthiery; how is it done? (in reply to Ruphus

These are amazingly thin sheets. I would think with cardboard or papier mache made in the common way at those measures things should hardly be managable. The strings pulling alone should fold up the whole thing. From there I suppose reinforcement to be in place.

From what I heard, it is not clear whether Torres was of the opinion that B&S wouldn´t matter at all, eventhough his or Zantini´s guitar might be proof in that sense.
While the top seems to determine vast of the corpus characteristics, many users ( and I ) are of the impression that rosewood and especially BR appears to typically contribute to a dark timbre and deep, round bass.

Beyond that I experienced maple guitars with exceptionally sweet trebles, and read from others who concluded the same characteristics for this material.
For same reason maple seems to be used traditinally for violins, which need smoothing to avoid brittleness of the upper register.
And nicely raspy flamencas seem to typically come in with cypress.

But what do I know, all I can say is that Zantini´s example sounds pretty good in the same time.
-

Is there info about harmonic properties and how luthiers might approach that aspect?

Ruphus
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 29 2011 11:59:25
 
DoctorX2k2

 

Posts: 211
Joined: Jun. 14 2006
From: Quebec City, Canada

RE: Fine luthiery; how is it done? (in reply to Ruphus

I don't know... really. Look at the 14th picture on Zontini's website : http://www.zontiniguitars.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 29 2011 16:05:06
 
DoctorX2k2

 

Posts: 211
Joined: Jun. 14 2006
From: Quebec City, Canada

RE: Fine luthiery; how is it done? (in reply to Ruphus

As for the B&S sound characteristics of rosewood and maple... maybe it has to do with the stiffness and how to top is coupled to the sides. I think a luthier could easily build a guitar with rosewood B&S with a much less bassy response by increasing the gluing surface between the top and sides or by using bigger or stiffer kerfings or by not scalloping down the harmonic bars. There are so many ways to approach this... and as they change the bass response, they probably change the other characteristics in different ways. Getting the right balance is a luthier's lifework and I can't imagine any of them figuring this out without a lot of trials and errors, plus a little bit of luck. Even when they find out, reproducing the same results over and over is another big piece of work.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 29 2011 16:32:15
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: Fine luthiery; how is it done? (in reply to Ruphus

As you say, logically the structure, hence kind of material too, should make a difference. Its feedback effecting the tops performance.
After all, if you, let´s say, bear a membrane on a rubber structure much of membranes resonance should be absorbed. From there the individual kind of bearing structure should influence which frequencies might be rather responded too and which lesser so.

It might also influence whether vibrations of the top will be emitted fast ( = bright sound, I guess ) or slow ( = accumulating / depth of tone ). It might also individually influence whether low or high frequencies will be either slowed down or released with just little lag.
I tend to think that for instance the denseness of rosewood in combination with its oil contents would slow down low frequencies and lend them depth ( while absorbing some of HF ), while maple would do similar rather to upper frequencies ( while bluring some of LF ).

Naturally, all considered with structural specs as ( nearly ) parameter.
-

Besides, I would welcome if available / "ordinary" species from secondary forests would replace exotic woods as sought after material.
Which is why I notice when a well reputated luthier remarks that for instance sycamore delivers all attributes for best results.

It is also why I like the cardboard example, as it could contribute to getting away from the BR hype.

... Maybe ovations could be a hintside too. I used to have one that was performing quite well despite its back of plastic.

Ruphus
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 30 2011 10:30:05
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.078125 secs.