Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
Posts: 4530
Joined: Aug. 9 2006
From: Iran (living in Germany)
Montse Cortes 2010
Does anybody know from which Album this bulerias is? As far as i know there is no new Album from Montse released. Is it maybe a CD from a Guitarist and Montse as Guest singing?( she sings not much in this track)
...haha, agreed, outsource hopeless projects (if its not politically catalysed)
Also agree on music and women, they taste very different ...And I respect your opinion, I just categorized you categorizing low weight = beautiful and heavy weight = not beautiful
Nevertheless, I try to enjoy what mother earth was willing to offer me, and not just to described it. Sometimes you have to touch things to feel the beauty. Whatever....I like your rude jokes
curves or hills? You choose. Besides, being more wide or corpulent does not mean more fat tissue! The look depends on where the fat lies and on muscle/fat ratio IMO! (maybe also thickness of skin or skin layers) and to add another thing: im sure i heard of a study where scientists claimed to have found out that its not the absolute measures (like being fat, thin, small, tall, etc) that determine attractiveness, but the relative proportions of shoulders to waist, and waist to hips.
.....that its not the absolute measures (like being fat, thin, small, tall, etc) that determine attractiveness, but the relative proportions of shoulders to waist, and waist to hips.
oh well, it is all science....now that is really sexy !
I know its summer and its hot. If i am horny and there is no woman around, i don't watch youtube but youporn instead. Do the same and focus on Cante in foroflamenco for gods sake
.....that its not the absolute measures (like being fat, thin, small, tall, etc) that determine attractiveness, but the relative proportions of shoulders to waist, and waist to hips.
oh well, it is all science....now that is really sexy !
One of the most important things ive learnt in the last years is to control my nerdism (=biggest turn off) in real life! But that doesnt apply to the internet as you see
... yeah..you choose.. Check this excerpt from a significant scientific work. The author points out the problems very well IMO. Well..this chapter is about whale tails..but fits here pretty well.
I find it most interesting that on the left are definitely less curves than on the right. But the left test person is 110% more attractive than the others on the middle and right. Im just wondering about the unnatural shadows.. Looks like manipulation... Especially the size of the one from the middle and right person...
Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
I know its summer and its hot. If i am horny and there is no woman around, i don't watch youtube but youporn instead. Do the same and focus on Cante in foroflamenco for gods sake
you have to be careful because there can be negative side effects that can affect guitar playing.
Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
Printable Version
(if its not politically catalysed) 
Especially the size of the one from the middle and right person... 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread