Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.

Update cookies preferences




Another basic rasgueado question   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
Munin

 

Posts: 595
Joined: Sep. 30 2008
From: Hong Kong

Another basic rasgueado question 

Reading the other rasgueado thread got me wondering about my own technique, in a slightly different context. From my teacher, I've learned the traditional amii rasgueado in a way where I'm flicking/fixing my fingers on the very first part of my thumb, the tip, so to speak (and thus I'm doing it like Graf-Martinez as shown in his DVD I think). However, I keep noticing that other players seem to do it more from the inner part of the hand, so I keep wondering if what I'm doing is not especially good...?

Particularly when playing bulerias, I've noticed that switching to a rasgueado position for a amii rasgueado out of doing i upstrokes/golpes, with my version, I completely have to change my thumb/hand position, and it takes a lot of time and distance to "get there". So I wonder...is what I'm doing actually good technique? Or is it just about getting used to it? And why, with other players, it seems like they can do fast bulerias and flick out a rasgueado from nowhere without moving their hand/thumb one bit. Am I doing it wrong?
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Oct. 7 2008 6:31:00
 
Ricardo

Posts: 15242
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: Another basic rasgueado question (in reply to Munin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Munin

Reading the other rasgueado thread got me wondering about my own technique, in a slightly different context. From my teacher, I've learned the traditional amii rasgueado in a way where I'm flicking/fixing my fingers on the very first part of my thumb, the tip, so to speak (and thus I'm doing it like Graf-Martinez as shown in his DVD I think). However, I keep noticing that other players seem to do it more from the inner part of the hand, so I keep wondering if what I'm doing is not especially good...?

Particularly when playing bulerias, I've noticed that switching to a rasgueado position for a amii rasgueado out of doing i upstrokes/golpes, with my version, I completely have to change my thumb/hand position, and it takes a lot of time and distance to "get there". So I wonder...is what I'm doing actually good technique? Or is it just about getting used to it? And why, with other players, it seems like they can do fast bulerias and flick out a rasgueado from nowhere without moving their hand/thumb one bit. Am I doing it wrong?


It is not "wrong" but understand there are TWO ways, and the reason for doing it different is the sound. What I mean is, the amii you describe, flicking from the thumb, allows you to snap into the bass strings more. There are a lot of times this is very nice, but you get a snappy percussive sound (like a llamada for siguiriyas). The other way, the fingers are free and brush across and hit more the treble strings and get a brighter shimmering sound (like what you are not doing in bulerias). Watch some videos and notice the thumb position. When the thumb bends and the fingers get "cocked" like a gun, they flick and snap into the basses. But if the thumb is straight, the fingers don't flick, they "brush" very quick and smooth for a brighter sound.

Some folks wrongly believe that flicking from the thumb is more "modern" and the other technique more traditional, but both techniques were in use in the old days, and today. It is more about the sound you want to get.

Here is an old snapping bent thumb in siguiryas. It is out of synch but you can SEE what I mean. Look at :35, and 1:25, watch the thumb:


But here is a modern rasgueado where the thumb stays straight and you get the bright brushing sound at 0:22 and 4:21:


Hope that clears it up for you a little.


Ricardo

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Oct. 7 2008 8:37:39
 
Munin

 

Posts: 595
Joined: Sep. 30 2008
From: Hong Kong

RE: Another basic rasgueado question (in reply to Munin

That does clear it up - thanks!

I was aware of both ways, actually, but indeed as you described in the belief that nowadays, people would actually always use the "cocked" version, somehow. Additionally, my "free" rasgueado still sounds pretty weak and strummy, while for other players, in bulerias etc, sounds always pretty snappy too (though without the bassy edge), so it got me wondering what they were actually doing.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Oct. 8 2008 0:04:17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

6.298828E-02 secs.