Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
All this time I've been sitting in the PdL position (right leg crossed over left). This alignment is really awkward for my wrist; not painful but not natural, I feel like I have to constantly remind myself to angle my hand and it makes playing some techniques feel held-back.
Today I was messing around with different positions and tried the traditional "classical" position (left leg elevated on stool, guitar resting on left leg). My wrist felt much more comfortable as I was able to alighn it without having to bend my wrist and I also felt like this position naturally secured the guitar better to allow my left and right hands more freedom. And for those of you that noticed my "Arpeggio Critique" thread, this position actually makes my arpeggios feel a bit better.
Is it common to sit in a non-Flamenco position (this includes the tradition position where the guitar is angled and rests on the right leg, definitely not comfortable for me)? Is it in direct violation "unspeakable code of flamenco" to play in an alternate position like this?
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to soclydeza85)
Vicente sometimes sits non crossed legs as his years of sitting in the position have given him back pain.
Whatever works for you is my advice. Obviously the musculature and ligaments are in different positions with the classic and flamenco postures, and this will have advantages and drawbacks depending on what you are doing. For instance, I find parts of some classical pieces much harder to play when cross legged. I don't think I could do alzapua in the classical position.
I sometimes jump offstage while doing picado and land doing the splits in my favourite spandex activewear.
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to soclydeza85)
Yeah I noticed alzapua and rasgeado feel different, but doable (I suppose what I was trying may be more of a pseudo-classical posture, not as deep/angled).
I've continued experimenting with this since making this post and found that the PdL is a lot more comfortable if I don't use my upper arm as the resting point on the guitar but instead pull my arm up a bit so that my forearm is resting kind of on the edge (maybe an inch or two in from my elbow). I'm not a super tall person (maybe 5'10"-11") but my arm feels like it is too long to comfortably play with my upper arm/bicep resting on top like I usually see other players doing; it forces me to bend my wrist to align it, especially for arpeggios and picado.
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to soclydeza85)
Stool (in my case overturned expresso jar) works best for me. Frankly, I don't care if it looks 'flamenco' - and heck, even Tomatito uses one these days.
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to soclydeza85)
Even the great Flamenco guitarist Sabicas sat in the Classical position, left foot on foot stool, I think Flamenco purists, are too rigid in their "have to do like this" do "that way", I personally use Sabicus's sitting position, anything cross legged is to awkward, and un comfortable for me, and I really don't give a damn what people say, or think.
Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to soclydeza85)
quote:
ORIGINAL: soclydeza85
All this time I've been sitting in the PdL position (right leg crossed over left). This alignment is really awkward for my wrist; not painful but not natural, I feel like I have to constantly remind myself to angle my hand and it makes playing some techniques feel held-back.
Today I was messing around with different positions and tried the traditional "classical" position (left leg elevated on stool, guitar resting on left leg). My wrist felt much more comfortable as I was able to alighn it without having to bend my wrist and I also felt like this position naturally secured the guitar better to allow my left and right hands more freedom. And for those of you that noticed my "Arpeggio Critique" thread, this position actually makes my arpeggios feel a bit better.
Is it common to sit in a non-Flamenco position (this includes the tradition position where the guitar is angled and rests on the right leg, definitely not comfortable for me)? Is it in direct violation "unspeakable code of flamenco" to play in an alternate position like this?
Sit the way in which feels most comfortable for you ! There is no real right or wrong way.
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to pundi64)
What's on that picture isn't the classical position. The guitar would have to be couched on his left leg, not sitting on top of his right. But agreed, people should do whatever works best for them although to be honest I haven't really heard anyone in flamenco get all high and mighty about guitar position.
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to soclydeza85)
I wouldn't call that classical position really..... it's the traditional old school flamenco position with a foot stool added. That's the position I use now but without the foot stool, not exactly sure what the stool is doing for him if the bout is resting on his right leg.....he must have had a reason...
What's on that picture isn't the classical position. The guitar would have to be couched on his left leg, not sitting on his right. But agreed, people should do whatever works best for them although to be honest I haven't really heard anyone in flamenco get all high and mighty about guitar position.
I play with a leg rest, so couched on the right leg, your an example of perfectionist.
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to Leñador)
Lifting the left leg squeezes the sphincter a bit and keeps you from farting mid-performance. (secretly hoping that someone will actually buy this explanation!)
edit: pundi64 You misunderstand me. I don't care how you or anybody holds the guitar (as I said: "people should do whatever works best for them"). All I was saying is that what is commonly known as the classical guitar position and taught in music conservatories all over the world is not this, not what Sabicas is doing here. It's not the way he's holding the guitar that is wrong, it's calling that "the classical position" that's wrong. It's just a matter of terminology.
I tend to use the traditional flamenco position for practice. Seems to be easier on the back when you're just doing the same thing for hours and hours. In performances it really depends though overall I think I favor the PdL position for some reason.
Posts: 3446
Joined: Jan. 20 2004
From: Austin, Texas USA
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to pundi64)
quote:
ORIGINAL: pundi64
Even the great Flamenco guitarist Sabicas sat in the Classical position, left foot on foot stool, I think Flamenco purists, are too rigid in their "have to do like this" do "that way", I personally use Sabicus's sitting position, anything cross legged is to awkward, and un comfortable for me, and I really don't give a damn what people say, or think.
Looking closely at Sabicas, you will note that most of the time the guitar doesn't touch the left leg. Most of the time the guitar is still supported between the right upper arm and the right thigh, the "old school" flamenco position.
Sabicas often moved the right hand between the bridge and the fretboard while doing extended rasgueados. While he still used the "old school' position with both feet flat on the floor, the guitar was supported by the left hand on the neck during these sweeping rasgueado gestures.
Sabicas adopted the pseudo classical position only quite late in his career. I never saw him use it in person--the last time I saw him live was in 1965. Maybe the guitar touched the left leg while he did those rasgueado sweeps?
RNJ
Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
Posts: 15242
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to pundi64)
quote:
ORIGINAL: pundi64
Even the great Flamenco guitarist Sabicas sat in the Classical position, left foot on foot stool, I think Flamenco purists, are too rigid in their "have to do like this" do "that way", I personally use Sabicus's sitting position, anything cross legged is to awkward, and un comfortable for me, and I really don't give a damn what people say, or think.
Well he adopted what is obviously the classical sitting position, with the footstool left foot insanely high up, but he doesnt' rest the waist of the guitar on the left leg, which twists your back uncomfortably. So he is a little more square, however his leaning over the neck might of given him back problems though I have never heard of him complaining. Anyway, it looks like the same as trad flamenco with feet flat but he rarely lifts the guitar off the knee to support with left hand, the whole purpose of the footstool is to support the guitar up, as you can see here:
After all I support the idea of changing positions while playing to avoid strain. I might practice make a switch in mid song in some cases.
Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to soclydeza85)
When I started learning flamenco a few years ago I tried all the various positions I saw famous players using online. I could not comfortably sit like PDL for any length of time so that was a no. I found the Sabicas way the most comfortable, lower bout resting on right leg. I usually also have both feet on the floor but find a stool on the left leg works well too.
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to Leñador)
quote:
ORIGINAL: Leñador
There are many "flamenco sitting positions" to try and guitar supports. Classical position will make alzapua and rasgeado impossible.
Not exactly true. I did a passable alza pua as well as about 20 different rasgueado variations playing exclusively in classical position; however I preferred to play in traditionalposition (both feet on the floor, guitar on the r. hip) when accompanying since it didn't give me a stiff neck.
Posts: 276
Joined: May 3 2017
From: Iraq, living in Cologne, Germany
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to soclydeza85)
can one say that sometimes the dimensions of the guitar don't fit the body proportions of the player and thus holding the guitar feels weird or uncomfortable? I have had this problem with my current guitar ever since I got it. I just feel that it is too small for my arms/upper body, especially in the lower bout.
Posts: 15242
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to jalalkun)
quote:
ORIGINAL: jalalkun
can one say that sometimes the dimensions of the guitar don't fit the body proportions of the player and thus holding the guitar feels weird or uncomfortable? I have had this problem with my current guitar ever since I got it. I just feel that it is too small for my arms/upper body, especially in the lower bout.
Posts: 276
Joined: May 3 2017
From: Iraq, living in Cologne, Germany
RE: Non-"flamenco" sitting... (in reply to Ricardo)
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricardo
Practice on ukelele for a while.
ok this would be like holding a frickin chicken wing. but it's actually a good idea since I also have difficulties holding an ukulele properly. I might try it out on a cheap ukulele and see what happens. thanks ricardo
Printable Version
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread