Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
The effect of mass on a guitar's sound
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
a_arnold
Posts: 558
Joined: Jul. 30 2006
|
The effect of mass on a guitar's sound
|
|
|
They say that the best singers are overweight because they can project their voices better. The sound vibrations can't vibrate the rest of their body because of it's mass, and therefore the vibrations are focused in the vocal chords, giving clarity and strength to their sound. I was struck by a comment someone made on this forum about the effect of heavy machine tuners on the sound of a guitar, and it got me thinking. I have a negra and a blanca, both made to the same plans by the same luthier, both using a spruce top. The Brazilian rosewood is heavier (I can feel the difference when holding both), and the negra seems to have much more sustain and maybe a little more volume. And one of Torres' innovations in his later years was to sand the top thinner near the edges so it could vibrate more independently of the rest of the guitar and accelerate more responsively to string vibration -- so the top is dampened less by interaction with the rest of the guitar -- like Pavarotti's vocal chords vibrating independently of his rather stolid, immobile body. Heavy rosewood, machine heads (and, presumably, steel neck reinforcement, when used) -- not to mention how tightly the guitarist holds the body of the guitar, all affect the effective mass of the instrument, preventing the body of the guitar from moving and absorbing vibration from the top. The less the body moves, the more the vibrational energy has to be dissipated by the top. Ergo, more projection. So the question: Does the extremely light construction in blancas diminish their sustain? Is this why flamenco guitars have more "punch" than classicals and less sustain? And why my lighter blanca has less sustain than the negra? Huber's book on "The Development of the Modern Guitar" says that many luthiers maintain that the back/side wood is immaterial to sound, and that the only reason that flamencos traditionally had cypress back and sides was economic -- gypsies were an underclass. Same with pegs. They're cheaper. But now I'm beginning to question that. Comments?
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 11 2007 3:02:53
|
|
a_arnold
Posts: 558
Joined: Jul. 30 2006
|
RE: The effect of mass on a guitar's... (in reply to a_arnold)
|
|
|
You're all absolutely right (except I have to say I think Carreras couldn't match the Pavarotti punch. Just listen to the "3 Tenors" PBS show. Granted, Carreras was recovering from an illness at the time, but still...). Yes, there is a lot more to luthiery than the mass of the guitar, and absolutely it is a balancing act that only experience can achieve. And there will inevitably be miraculous exceptions like Ramon's Archangel blanca. I know there can't be a simple path to the ultimate guitar (if there even is such a thing). And I know there are other factors. It's just that I have this blanca and negra pair by the same experienced maker (Castillo), and I can feel an obvious difference in mass, I KNOW the mass difference doesn't reside in the soundboard, rather in the back and sides, and I can hear a clear difference in the sustain. Insofar as possible, all other variables are eliminated here. When my wife, who knows nothing about guitars, heard it for the first time from the other room (not knowing I had even received it) she yelled "What happened to your guitar?!?" It's that obvious. I'm really just asking about the effect of mass. Maybe the answer is to take Mike Kasha's experimental method. Take a very light guitar and clamp the body (without hampering the top's vibration) so it can't move at all, thus simulating infinite mass, and compare the volume clamped and unclamped. . . someone may have already tried this. I don't know. Tony Arnold
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 12 2007 13:35:58
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.046875 secs.
|