Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
The Temptations of 'Winning' an Argument
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
rogeliocan
Posts: 811
Joined: Nov. 23 2009
From: Canada
|
RE: The Temptations of 'Winning' an ... (in reply to Ricardo)
|
|
|
quote:
remarks of "critics" that so and so plays with ONLY technique and no feeling.. This is something that I have though of some players. It does not take anything from the fact they have amazing technique but to me, and this is only an opinion, what is played sounds like something is missing, something important. Like a computer playing extremely difficult passages but lacking feeling, like Data in the Next Generation if you are a trekie. And for a flamenco player, at times I have thought, with reason or not, that the piece is too clean, too perfect (while it isn't from an interpretation point of view... again my opinion), and sometimes, I also think it is because a classical player is playing flamenco. It does not take anything away from their amazing ability to play, but it sometimes sounds like a fast mechanical piano.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Jul. 7 2013 18:38:48
|
|
Miguel de Maria
Posts: 3532
Joined: Oct. 20 2003
From: Phoenix, AZ
|
RE: The Temptations of 'Winning' an ... (in reply to krichards)
|
|
|
To me this means, when you've not mastered the instrument, it feels awkward, effortful, perhaps painful (barre chords?). When you have mastered it, it feels easy, because it is. If your technique is efficient and the music properly prepared, it just flows. Ricardo, your statement about techique seems to set up another false dichotomy, the point of this thread was to refute. Someone can have a perfect technique and we can all envy that; yet his playing can also leave us cold because he's not saying anything or we aren't getting it.
_____________________________
Connect with me on Facebook, all the cool kids are doing it. https://www.facebook.com/migueldemariaZ Arizona Wedding Music Guitar
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Jul. 8 2013 2:45:43
|
|
guitarbuddha
Posts: 2970
Joined: Jan. 4 2007
|
RE: The Temptations of 'Winning' an ... (in reply to z6)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: z6 The guy might be a great player but he was probably drunk and talking to a disciple. He was aving a larf. Nope it is one of his pet phrases. Think of it like this, you see someone running in the park and they make it look easy. Well they are running well and for them it feels easy too. You see another runner and they look kinda klunky and uncomfortable. They are not running well and it probably feels hard to run. And they, no matter how fit they get, will probably always struggle with injury. There are many interesting aphorisms, for example 'The more things change the more they stay the same'. 'You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink' 'There are none so blind as those who wont see' And very often aphorism quite deliberately flirt with paradox. To suggest that an aphorism is simply wrong with respect to it's construction whilst defaulting to the most banal of interpretations only really works in some narrow social circles. So I might say of the first one 'The more things change' . 'Well thats just stupid, the opposite true.' . It might make a good joke but if I appeared to be in earnest I probably wouldn't be given much credit. Likewise the second 'You can lead a horse to water',I might say 'I CAN make it drink, I just hit it with my rhetorical hammer until it grudgingly sips' And at that an onlooker chips in with, 'Horse, what horse, you don't have a horse !' Then he triumphantly flounces off with the rags over his eyes wet with tears.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Jul. 8 2013 10:48:02
|
|
Miguel de Maria
Posts: 3532
Joined: Oct. 20 2003
From: Phoenix, AZ
|
RE: The Temptations of 'Winning' an ... (in reply to guitarbuddha)
|
|
|
GB, I wanted to respond to your Mel Bay rant (which seems to have been taken the wrong way by the others): I started off learning how to play with softcover Mel Bay books back in the late 80s. That was what I had. I didn't like them and always considered them kind of cheesy and low quality. However, a few years later, I was studying CG at college and saw the LA guitar quartet at a festival; and after the show, my teacher and I saw two old guys standing near the stage, signing autographs. One was Chet Atkins, the other was--Mel Bay! The way it was setup, you could get the autograph of one, but not the other. I chose to go and get Mel Bay's autograph! It was kind of an ironic joke, but also kind of for nostalgia. Now it so happens that I have in front of me: 2 Stanley Yates repertoire books, 1 Esteban de Sanlucar Book, and one JS Bach Cello Suite books. The flamenco one has tabulature, the others do not; they are all from MB. A couple of the classical ones did come with CDs. Stanley Yates is a premier, world-class interpreter of Bach. These are the things I am working on now. It seems strange that after all these years, I have Mel Bay stuff in front of me!
_____________________________
Connect with me on Facebook, all the cool kids are doing it. https://www.facebook.com/migueldemariaZ Arizona Wedding Music Guitar
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Jul. 10 2013 15:12:40
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.078125 secs.
|