Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
neck issue? body issue?
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
Guitarsid
Posts: 52
Joined: Aug. 5 2013
From: Maryland USA
|
RE: neck issue? body issue? (in reply to keith)
|
|
|
I bet it is just a matter of specifying what these measurements are exactly. They should always specify what the exact point to point is that is being measured, otherwise one must assume what it may be. Is the 6 mm saddle height measured from the top of the saddle to the top of the bridge? If so then that is a good bit showing and it leaves a lot of room to lower it and the action. If there is 4 mm space from 6th string to the top of fret#12, then you could easily lower that to 2 mm or lower than ever desired. However, if 6 mm is the height of the saddle top from the guitar top, then that is not acceptable IMO and would suspect a very bad (shallow or low) neck angle to body. The neck angle is always the starting point to me and critical, I always want to know the height that is measured when a straight edge is laid flat down the middle of the fingerboard, with the strings tuned to concert pitch, extended all the way to the bridge, and the resulting gap seen at the bridge, which is measured from the guitar top to the straightedge bottom. But this is not ever normally reported by sellers, such as on ebay. Next most important thing I want to know is the relief in the neck of the guitar, tuned to concert pitch, especially in any vintage guitar. We have no way of knowing about what conditions old guitars were subjected to during their life, such as long term temperature/humidity exposures. All things considered, examination of the guitar in person is always so much better than reading a seller's description.
_____________________________
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Aug. 20 2013 12:31:05
|
|
Guitarsid
Posts: 52
Joined: Aug. 5 2013
From: Maryland USA
|
RE: neck issue? body issue? (in reply to keith)
|
|
|
I think you are correct, that is the most common measurement, so if it is string height of 6mm and string to fret 12 height of 4 mm, then to get to 3 mm string height at fret 12, you would need to take off at least 2 mm from the string height. This leaves only 4 mm string height which is too low and both playing and sound would suffer, imo. If the saddle is barely peeking over the bridge slot then it may not even be possible to lower the saddle at all. If it even has 2 mm showing, then that means it would have to have a bridge height of only 4 mm, which is too low, again, imo. The strings need some ramping coming out of the holes, the less the string pressure on the saddle the more the sound starts to suffer. I think it sounds like some neck adjusting may be needed and that could possibly be done with heat resetting or fingerboard planing. This always goes back to the root cause, which is either the neck angle is now too low, or the top is bellying and sinking down in front of the bridge, or both.
_____________________________
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Aug. 20 2013 14:31:45
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.0625 secs.
|