Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva, Tom Blackshear and Sean O'Brien who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
Well I just came back from a local luthier and I am gonna commission a guitar. Spent around an hour and 1/2 talking guitars and wood etc and to me it was causing my head to spin a little bit. I have three spruce types to choose for a top plate for example.
Anyways, he mentioned that he is using fret wire that are about 0.3mm taller than he was using before from a couple of years ago, and that this is a "new thing". Players don't seem to notice it.
Anyone care to comment on the impact of fret height on playbility?
I can play easier with higher frets, and its not even a small effect in my eyes. It just doesnt get noticed as much i think. But i also like deep necks, i.e. with a lot of wood from the string to where your thumb is. Must be something to do with the architecture of the hand, how long your thumb is etc. Very interesting topic imo, but somehow overlooked.
I like shallow necks myself, but I have only played a few guitars and as my skill level improves, who knows if my current taste is no longer valid? That is a constant problem, you never know if what you are doing can't be done better cause you are stuck with what you have...
PS, Deniz, can you describe why it is easier, is it that you need to place less pressure to cleanly fret a note? Does it effect intonation?
I had mentioned fret-hight in a different thread. I believe it is an often overlooked problem with effects mistakenly blamed on the action. My favorite Conde has them really low, and i have all my guitars adjusted accordingly. To me -ad i love low action- it makes an enormous difference.
I once returned an Orange Conde, whose sound I loved, beacuse my hand felt unduly fatigued after palying. After lowring the action, much heated discussion went on about "moving" ever so slightly the neck angle. A procedure I opposed but ended up trying to no avail. I wish i had known then the intricate consequences of fret-hights.
Lowering the action is simply one step in reaching the ideal state of comfortable playabity but frets must necessarily be taken into account.
Classical guitarists seem to love them on the higher end, and i understand volume and tone are enhanced by so doing. Yet such set up is more appropriate for that style.
A simple test, is to have your luthier measure the guitar you enjoy playing and feel comfortable with for "hours".
I like shallow necks myself, but I have only played a few guitars and as my skill level improves, who knows if my current taste is no longer valid? That is a constant problem, you never know if what you are doing can't be done better cause you are stuck with what you have...
Of course i know that feeling. Hence one should try different guitars. As far as i am concerned, my preferences in necks havent changed from the beginning. I wouldnt say its a taste. I really explain this with basic biologic facts, the way my hand is shaped. These things just dont change. Most players prefer thin/shallow necks. A very flat "D". I actually have to put my thumb a little more forward to build up (a little) "pressure", which i dont do on guitars with a thick neck. This way i can build pressure much faster. I have a guitar that i have bought for 20 Euros... it looks exactly like a D. I only keep it because it has a great neck, and a faster response than my flamenco guitar. Havent changed the bass strings 1 year on it but it sounds also brighter than the flamenco with new strings on. (i only mean the bass strings. on the trebles there is only plastic sound)
It'd be easier to shave them into a lower height than raise them, i suppose. So if you are really undecidedly stuck, try the higher propostion, with an understanding (from the Luthier) that the condition can be readily converted, if you so choose.
On a gibson les paul low frets make it easier to play fast, but give less tone. You dont really have the adjustability of a les paul. Higher frets pretty much reduce the string distance to fret, effectively you have lower action
you will need to learn a lighter touch though, so you dont pull the strings sharp, almost like playing a scalloped fretboard but not to that extreme.
But I do wonder if there is a theoretical best fret height for a player or if there is a range of insensitivity that it doesn't matter that much given the high and low responses.
Taking it to extremes, zero frets I would imagine play well but you can't do chords very easily - at least I think but I don't know. Then if they are too low you may not get the note either, and you may have to press harder to make sure the string is on the fret with sufficient force.
So maybe it is best to go as low as you can while still getting a clean note?
I can imagine scenarios where higher frets might requiring lower pressure to get the note, I mean what would happen if they were so high you didn't touch the fret board?
I don't know what to think, and I don't have the experience to know what I want definitely...
PS Thanks HemeolaMan, just saw your post, I guess there are plus and minus to both approach.
Anyways, he mentioned that he is using fret wire that are about 0.3mm taller than he was using before from a couple of years ago, and that this is a "new thing".
Have you thought about how much .3 mm is? The fingerboard will expand and contract nearly that much with changes in humidity. Your luthier is correct, the player won't notice any difference. We used to use wide oval DiMarzio frets and everyone seemed to like them. We stopped using them because they are so difficult to work with.
Yes, 0.3mm doesn't sound like much, but then I noticed a difference between a 52mm and a 53mm fretboard. By percentage that is a lot less than 0.3mm on a fret wire. It could have been the nut string spacing also...
I just came back from the repair shop where my trusted luthier adjusted my new German Vazquez Rubio to harmonize to the specs of my Conde.
Height of the frets, measured from my Conde Hermanos AF/25 R, as originally set, is: 0.030''
This is quite a diparture from the specs Cat's luthier is advising.
Disclaimer: i am not criticizing anyone's choice of fret-heights, but simply reporting a "factual information" drawn from a famous guitar, but above all subjectively pleasing my style and habits.
I just came back from the repair shop where my trusted luthier adjusted my new German Vazquez Rubio to harmonize to the specs of my Conde.
Height of the frets, measured from my Conde Hermanos AF/25 R, as originally set, is: 0.030''
This is quite a diparture from the specs Cat's luthier is advising.
Disclaimer: i am not criticizing anyone's choice of fret-heights, but simply reporting a "factual information" drawn from a famous guitar, but above all subjectively pleasing my style and habits.
I don't believe you. I think you're just trying to stir up a hornets nest. Being the Devil's Advocate is something you legal types love...
FWI: 0.030" = 0.8mm
Now, I just checked out my Flamenco and my classical, and its really hard to get the height, as I don't have the tools, but it appears that the Classical is just under 1mm and the Flamenco is just barely above 1mm. 1mm = 0.04"
The differences we're talking about are tenths of a millimetre. I could probably guess/bet that the difference in the classical and the flamenco are indeed about 0.03mm different (without a micrometer or caliper, I can't say for sure - we're talking less than the width of a gradient line on my steel rule).
quote:
ORIGINAL: cathulu
He is in abbotsford
So, your questions about how much you might be involved in decision making have been answered? Care to share with us?
0,8mm is a vVERY low fretwire. I dont think you can buy anything lower than 0,94mm.
So it must be a guitar which for some reason has had its frets lowered. I have played Condes and they did not have such low frets.
Fretheight is a compromise. Theory. Talking about same string setup.
Lower frets, pros: faster play and a feel that action is lower because distance between string and fingerboard (not fret) is smaller. relaxing feel in left hand. cons. you have to fret you fingers more precise in order to produce a good tone. (closer to frets. will last less time, because you will wear them out faster.
Higher frets: Pros: you dont have to fret your fingers so precise in order to produce a good tone. They last longer. cons. The guitar feels like it has a higher setup. More stressing feel in left hand.
Go for something normal. I will advice you a 1 - 1,1mm high wire. Making the wire wider can give you a feel of a lower fretwire because you dont bump so much when you slide up and down the neck, but intonation will be worse on worn out frets
Thanks for the fret height measurements - I measured my Raimundo 145 with the bad action and it measures about 1.1mm and a classical luthier built guitar (steve heizen) and it also measures about 1.1mm. I think I am plus or minus 0.05mm. I measured by stacking feeler gauges and eyeballing it. It is hard to measure without a depth gauge. But 0.3mm would be visually noticeable.
Yes, I can see that gj fret height is quite low!
Based on a very limited sample it seems around 1mm - 1.1mm is norm, 0.8mm is low and anything over 1.1m is high?
I will ask the luthier what the finished fret height will be a check it against the fret measurements.
FYI I came across this from a classical guitar luthier's site, not the guy I am talking about... not sure if this would translate to Flamenco "Playability is a primary concern. Frets are extra tall for ease of fretting, and fingerboards are radiused and relieved slightly to facilitate barring"
Anders, this was composed before your post and then came after... thanks for your input!
0,8mm is a vVERY low fretwire. I dont think you can buy anything lower than 0,94mm.
So it must be a guitar which for some reason has had its frets lowered. I have played Condes and they did not have such low frets.
Fretheight is a compromise. Theory. Talking about same string setup.
Lower frets, pros: faster play and a feel that action is lower because distance between string and fingerboard (not fret) is smaller. relaxing feel in left hand. cons. you have to fret you fingers more precise in order to produce a good tone. (closer to frets. will last less time, because you will wear them out faster.
Higher frets: Pros: you dont have to fret your fingers so precise in order to produce a good tone. They last longer. cons. The guitar feels like it has a higher setup. More stressing feel in left hand.
Go for something normal. I will advice you a 1 - 1,1mm high wire. Making the wire wider can give you a feel of a lower fretwire because you dont bump so much when you slide up and down the neck, but intonation will be worse on worn out frets
This is the best explanation I have seen regarding fret height.
FWIW, I have had the pleasure of owning and playing quite a few flamenco guitars. The easiest one to play was a negra which had larger than normal frets (which were this luthier's standard fret size) and a slightly radiused fingerboard. This guitar was just effortless on the left hand. Action was set low, well under 3mm at 12th fret. I owned his guitar for 5 years.
The most difficult one to play well, was a blanca which had extremely low frets. This guitar was in my possession for a long time. It was not hard on the left hand and played very fast, but was difficult to fret cleanly. I think that what makes the problem worse with super low frets is that they may not be crowned as well as higher frets. If the fret is too flat, it will be more difficult to be accurate with the left hand fingers, and may also lead to some intonation problems.
If you're using an instrument that you'll be placing a capo on very often, would it help to have a lower fret height, to prevent detuning?
Not that it should be more important than ease of fingering, but if all things were equal as far as the player was concerned, would it be worth looking at?
Umm... feels like it should be a dumb question because I should know this by now, but when you guys talk about measuring action, you're measureing from top of fret to the string, que no?
This is the best explanation I have seen regarding fret height.
Thank you
exitao, you meassure from top of fret to bottom of sting. I dont think its a good idea to include the capo thing on choosing frets, but I think you are right in what you say.
I´ve just finished a setup of a peghead Blanca. 1mm high frets 2,1mm wide. (my standard, stewmac 048) It has a 2,5mm setup 6th string 12th fret and 2mm 1st string using Luthier 30. The guitar works wonderfully without capo and with capo up to 7th fret. Just a slight buzz when you play hard.
If you're using an instrument that you'll be placing a capo on very often, would it help to have a lower fret height, to prevent detuning?
Not that it should be more important than ease of fingering, but if all things were equal as far as the player was concerned, would it be worth looking at?
Umm... feels like it should be a dumb question because I should know this by now, but when you guys talk about measuring action, you're measureing from top of fret to the string, que no?
Yes, with low frets very little retuning is required with a capo. Higher frets will need more adjustments after placing the capo.
Action is usually measured from the top of the fret to the bottom of the string at the 12th fret. -:)
Thanks for the replies gents. I'd rate your posts high if we were allowed in this forum.
Good to know about how to measure.
As far as the capo question was, it was just an intellectual exercise, but it does seem that, si te da igual, and it doesn't affect the sound, why not keep them as low as comfortably possible in a Flamenco where you know you'll be using a capo often?
But some people do seem to suggest that it's easier to fret (while playing) when the strings are higher, that's interesting. I'll have to pull out my crappy classical and see if I can feel a difference.
I´ve just finished a setup of a peghead Blanca. 1mm high frets 2,1mm wide. (my standard, stewmac 048) It has a 2,5mm setup 6th string 12th fret and 2mm 1st string using Luthier 30. The guitar works wonderfully without capo and with capo up to 7th fret. Just a slight buzz when you play hard.
Wow. That is a great set up ( though I would prefer Luthier 20's -;) ) If the strings were about 7mm off the top at the bridge, I would think that to be absolute perfection.
One of the reasons to have a guitar built by a luthier who knows how to play it.
Printable Version
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread