Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
RE: Music Theory: Why?
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
Kevin
Posts: 294
Joined: Sep. 7 2008
|
RE: Music Theory: Why? (in reply to Sr. Martins)
|
|
|
Everyone is speaking of theory and practice as if they are two distinct things. They are not!!! If you do not study theory FORMALLY, you will still have theories in your head. IT IS BASIC COGNITION. We can't function without analogy, metaphor, and other types of comparison that lead to basic theorizing. Flamencos like Paco have formulated tacit theories. They don't articulate them in words, they articulate them in falsetas. To know that you can play a melody like this with a chord like this without knowing the names is still to have a theory about how music is put together. It is called tacit (hidden) knowledge contrasted with explicit or discursive knowledge (knowledge you can put into words. THEORY/PRACTICE ARE A COIN. If you play music, you possess this coin. The question is, "Do you need to refine/translate your experiential theory into Western terms." Does your tails side of the coin need to be a Western theory. NO. But if you do study Music theory formally, your practice and theory will constantly align, evolve AND, YOU WILL BE ABLE TO ARTICULATE IT to other people. "How to tell a story" is a strawman argument. Obviously music theory is gaining recognition in Spain. There are already books beginning to hit the market. Soon we will be flooded. Some are useless, some are decent, a couple are good. Get this, THEY ALL TRANSLATE using Western music theory. I suppose a better question is, should theory be a substitute for practice. NO. IT SHOULDN'T.
_____________________________
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Jan. 31 2015 17:35:30
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.078125 secs.
|