Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
The other day I was asking myself what if questions about Paco and development of flamenco guitar. What if Paco had never been born, what would the world of flamenco guitar be like today in terms of technique and popularity and what would have been different?
The second question kind of builds on the first one. Imagine flamenco guitar has evolved without Paco. Now recall young Paco in the 60s or 70s. How would he do in today's world of flamenco? Would he be considered special or would he be just another young tocaor?
The other day I was asking myself what if questions about Paco and development of flamenco guitar. What if Paco had never been born, what would the world of flamenco guitar be like today in terms of technique and popularity and what would have been different?
The second question kind of builds on the first one. Imagine flamenco guitar has evolved without Paco. Now recall young Paco in the 60s or 70s. How would he do in today's world of flamenco? Would he be considered special or would he be just another young tocaor?
These type of questions are about as pointless as “what if” you run the biology of earth all over again. The geological or outside influences at precisely timed moments in history are instrinsicly tied to the evolution process. If you alter these, of course things change. But there is not really a point to the exercise to separate the intrinsic elements.
“What if Devilhand got a real flamenco guitar and teacher?”
Riqueni would've been more famous and there wouldn't be cajons everywhere?
_____________________________
"Anything you do can be fixed. What you cannot fix is the perfection of a blank page. What you cannot fix is that pristine, unsullied whiteness of a screen or a page with nothing on it—because there’s nothing there to fix."
These type of questions are about as pointless as “what if” you run the biology of earth all over again. The geological or outside influences at precisely timed moments in history are instrinsicly tied to the evolution process. If you alter these, of course things change. But there is not really a point to the exercise to separate the intrinsic elements.
It's not about philosophical questions like what if the big bang never happened. So we need to relax and entertain ourselves and others.
Maybe the reason you dont want to discuss is if there had been no Paco, there would have been no Saturday night in SF. Consequently, most guys including you who are into flamenco because of Paco or SF, would have never come to know what flamenco is. For example you would have ended up shredding on e-guitar only?
Riqueni would've been more famous and there wouldn't be cajons everywhere?
Yes, you're right about cajons. But why Riqueni? I would ask who was under Paco's shadow most of the time? A few names come to my mind. Serranito, M. Sanlucar, Enrique de Melchor, Cepero or Paco's brother Ramon?
Maybe the reason you dont want to discuss is if there had been no Paco, there would have been no Saturday night in SF.
Flamenco is defined by the cante. There are plenty of aficionados and artists that don’t give 2 shytes about Paco or what he did or didn’t do to influence guitar players, because they are fine with a guy that plays like melchor de Marchena and nothing more is required. Now if want to remove Melchor, Ricardo, Montoya, Morao, Javier Molina, etc etc, what do we end up with? So it gets more and more pointless an exercise. Flamenco can be learned and mastered and even furthered along if one ignores Paco, and even Camaron. There is just not much point to doing that deliberately.
If you really deconstruct the sum total of human verbal interactions, I'd say a whole lot fall into the category of "pointless" - lighten up and have some fun ; )
I can give a clear answer to this, based on my limited experience - if Paco had never been born, Manolo Sanlucar would have been the man (assuming there were not comparable Paco's born). And yeah, of course Sanlucar was probably influenced by Paco - but of all the flamenco guitarists, I'd say he went outside the box of flamenco tradition in a way to make it more accessible to non-natives.
Printable Version
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread