Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
RE: Mosaic tile: A modest Remembrance of Eugene Clark
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
estebanana
Posts: 9413
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
|
RE: Mosaic tile: A modest Remembranc... (in reply to Escribano)
|
|
|
quote:
I think my blanca was one of the first to use some of Anders' firewood for the rosette and knowing how important olive wood is to one's home in Granada, it bears more than one aspect of beauty for me as perhaps, all rosettes should in their own way. Like your homage. The Olive wood has a deeper meaning and a connection to region, it has face value beauty, but Anders choose it because it has more meaning than a commercially prepared rosette. I think Gene would have liked that individual side of making in spirit. Really he said he wanted to see people make their own rosettes, and he preferred that Spanish work was in keeping with the mainline of tradition of making a rosette with a connection to traditional method. He came down on the side of making it yourself rather than buying a rosette premade. In person, off the record, his comments about other makers who used premade rosettes were, well honestly rather scathing. Unraveling or unpacking the point of view of an iconoclastic personality is delicate business and probably not in the interests of the Foro. And my intension was not to make that the point of my posts, but to pepper the content of rosette making with some hot comments to add an accent to the conversation. The intent I had in mind was to restate in my own way why making a rosette by hand is a good idea and to provide the Foro with one "recipe" a beginner maker could use as a reference to make a rosette. I wanted a thread where the topic could be added to by everyone who knows how to make rosettes, after I set it up with half dozen or so posts with content about rose making. It seems like people moved in with comments before that could happen and now I am no longer with the flow of my original intent. If anyone wants to take over the posts with the idea of building a rosette making thread that gives a nod to what they learned via Gene Clark's articles and efforts to preserve rosette making please go forth. Presently I've lost the interest to continue. The wrybald and somewhat sarcastic comment about the qualities of goat pee from different altitudes having an effect on the bleeding quality of veneer dyes did not go unnoticed, or unappreciated. Frankly I was shocked at such rough language. Please give me trigger warning in advance next time you plan to emotionally scar me with the subject of goat urine as a dye mordant. Indeed the flora goats consume at different altitudes must effect the colorfastness and durability of the dye stuffs when treated with the urine. Of course you may never have thought of this, but Gene gave me the secret formula of rabbit urine, aluminum stearate and dog hair to combat this altitude urine variance effect.
_____________________________
https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Mar. 20 2017 5:31:56
|
|
benros
Posts: 144
Joined: Aug. 27 2016
|
RE: Mosaic tile: A modest Remembranc... (in reply to estebanana)
|
|
|
stephen, im really sorry to hear that. I was so delighted, when you started this thread, since eugene clark and his attitude and approach to guitarbuilding made a big impression on me (and i have just read some of his articles in the gal magazine) and coincidentally i stumbled about his article about rosette making just two days before you came up with it. it would have been great for me (and surely many others) to follow you go to the process, but i can understand that you don't want to go on like that. And to those of you, who have killed this project: why isn't it possible here, just to let something meaningful grow, respect something which somebody is caring about, without discursively colonizing it and harming its skillful sharing intention, by carelessly spitting out the "****" (frankfurt 2005) that randomly shows up at your affected mindstreams? really, shame on you!
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Mar. 20 2017 8:57:27
|
|
BarkellWH
Posts: 3464
Joined: Jul. 12 2009
From: Washington, DC
|
RE: Mosaic tile: A modest Remembranc... (in reply to estebanana)
|
|
|
Stephen, I very much enjoyed and appreciated reading your thoughts on this thread and, in particular, your homage to Eugene Clark. Your respect and deep friendship for him came through in spades, and I consider it a damned shame that the self-absorbed, self-referential interloper who condemned your take on Clark because it did not comport with his disturbed this thread. And he had the gall and chutzpah to want to involve the Forum's administrator. ("What say you, Moderator?") We have just witnessed a class act (your homage to Clark) being thrown off-center by a total lack of class. But yours still comes through and shines. Thanks. Bill
_____________________________
And the end of the fight is a tombstone white, With the name of the late deceased, And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here, Who tried to hustle the East." --Rudyard Kipling
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Mar. 20 2017 10:35:19
|
|
estebanana
Posts: 9413
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
|
RE: Mosaic tile: A modest Remembranc... (in reply to benros)
|
|
|
quote:
stephen, im really sorry to hear that. I was so delighted, when you started this thread, since eugene clark and his attitude and approach to guitarbuilding made a big impression on me (and i have just read some of his articles in the gal magazine) and coincidentally i stumbled about his article about rosette making just two days before you came up with it. it would have been great for me (and surely many others) to follow you go to the process, but i can understand that you don't want to go on like that. I think if you study those two articles carefully you'll get a lot out of them. And I'll be happy to answer any questions if I can clear up any thing that may linger. During the three or four years leading up to those articles being written Gene and I had a lot of conversations and in person tutorials about rosette making, when I read those articles it was like getting a set of notes to his in person discourse. So I still have copies of the GAL with his article and I reread it the other day just to remember how he said things. To my knowledge in English in 2001-2002 when in published it was probably the most comprehensive document on Spanish rosette making. Perhaps in any language. It still stands as one of the essential documents of pedagogy in the topic. It is comprehensive and even if you don't agree or wander from it later the core of the knowledge can form a base to use. I'm very happy he has influenced your building. I was very lucky to have been in the right place at the right time to receive and keep alive the things he passed onto me. There are hundreds of makers now keeping it alive due to the internet so I think the tradition will go on longer, but Gene's work on the subject of rosettes made an in depth study of the structure of the early 20th classic designs and transmitted them in a way that you and I can make them if we apply ourselves. This continues to be very exciting to me because I can branch out and make variations on rosettes based on what he transmitted and then return to the basics of the Esteso, Manuel Ramirez, Santos rosettes and make more straight ahead versions of those rosettes. And what he said to encourage future makers was that once you have internalized that base of knowledge and command it, you can do anything and it will be an extension of the Spanish Tradition with your own mark on it. Don't misunderstand what he had in mind, he was not stuck on one way of making, but what the wanted was for makers to be liberated to go in their own style extension of Spanish work by way of deep discipline and being aware of the basic structures. He worked on that article with Jonathan Petersen to outline how to read the structure of the that era of rosette making. He stated these rosette patterns are compositions and here's how I read them visually and interpret them, he shows a great way to think about it. Before that I can't think of anyone who broke it down so clearly and succinctly. I'll see if I can muster doing this over, but emotionally this is draining to put work into creating a picture of someone who I consider a salty old poet - my view point is mt view point; what is emotionally draining is to needlessly defend and contest his legacy and what it means to me. I should not have to do that. Carry on with your rosette making!
_____________________________
https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Mar. 20 2017 11:09:39
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.09375 secs.
|