Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
|
RE: What´s up with the lisp?
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login  | |
|
   
estebanana
Posts: 9351
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
|
 RE: What´s up with the lisp? (in reply to Ruphus)
|
|
|
quote:
How about qualification before judge, Stephen.
Your exposure of superificial understanding and lack of knowledge paired with fancy of superiour judge is ridiculous.
And BTW; I have had students and learning friends all of my adulthood and received exeptional gratitude when they looked back years later.
I have had even stunned professors after helping individuals through their exams.
And I am experienced enough to realize a wannabe intellectual. You are occupied with your eagerness of being a thinker. That is why you hate me as litmus that contradicts your pseudo intellectualism.
Your elevating of clumsiness and celebrating of substantially different levels as conjured equal may verify your personal entangelement as sprouting wannabe, but it does no good to what actually counts: The matter.
Why not inform yourself, instead of parroting as cheap Adam Wheeler what you deem as new age´s impressive intellectualism.
With so much energy invested into fashion, you could instead already be autonomously informed and thinking.
I am occupied with the hard work of making guitars, playing the cello and painting a picture now and then. None of which I'll share to any great extent as long as you are allowed to foist your crap opinions on others.
If you want to insult me and say I'm a pseudo intellectual fine, your call. But to say I'm invested in fasionable theory thinking and that my process is not mine is much more of an insult I've ever given to you. You want to take everything away from others, you are intellectually selfish, selfish, selfish. You can't let others have their methodologies without calling them wrong, or saying those who hold different opinions from yours are brainwashed. You can't, or are unwilling, or incapable of processing the logical conclusions of others into part of the conversation.
You have the ego and the hubris to claim that you are a litmus test for others and conjecture the reason I hate you is because I don't accept your 'devils advocate' stance? How grandiose, and how truly deluded.
You coupled an ad hom attack with a fine defamation of character.
_____________________________
https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Oct. 5 2014 0:31:41
 |
|
Ruphus
Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
|
|
RE: What´s up with the lisp? (in reply to Ruphus)
|
|
|
A hypothetical question, Stephen:
What was to be if I was right with those statements?
I suspect that you would still be cherrishing aversion against me, for your symptomatic approach. ( Me introducing the devil.)
While I do wish for harmony, to my understanding getting along can´t be priority over matter. The latter is primacy.
( And in general I find it really entertaining and educating when the matter is priority; even though not doubting that in my case better diplomatic skills could only be useful.)
Further, with my limited diplomatic skills I wouldn´t even know how to incorporate certain takes into a consensus and ignore eventual disproportion / injust.
You can only make arrangements in respect of things / moves that won´t trigger another mischief. However, many aspects will produce mischief somewhere else when arranged as variable.
It is only that in our mainstream methodology deconstructivism is hardly known, lest even applied. Which again is not a coincidence.
Neglect of deconstructivism ( a main factor of ethics, besides) after all is one of the major intellectual means to organize a pretended democracy sans realization of it actually being a dictature.
You want an example of completely amputated deconstructivistic skills?
You are watching in the billions how a few thousand people are amassing endless values as private property and on their path and tactics of destruction are derpiving men and creature of innate rights and supply.
Lately even so ruinously exploiting life and planet that we are facing the greatest species extinction ever.
In the meantime the supposed thinking individuals among you are noting that social forms of societal organization had proven to fail.
That is all.
It is like living in the late 19th century and stating that combustion engine had proven as misconception, for noone been able to bring that tech to serial production.
Let aside to seriously consider an alternative to steam engines at all.
As if new ways to modern production and mobility weren´t in demand anyway.
We don´t need contemplation, no basic acknowledgement of sobriety and proportinality and no suspicion against private chambers that are labelled "democracy". Just keep moving on.
For, we could try out those crap opinions later on in Nirvana.
How self-focussed and conceited am I to see blatant phenomenons of faint, and where the hell are you wise, moderate, tolerant, politically correct hosts living?
What planet are you experiencing?
Ruphus
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Oct. 5 2014 9:40:35
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.0625 secs.
|
Printable Version
