Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
How rewarding it is when you stay in the exercise, increasingly reducing all superfluous action and nervous engagement until you peeled out the elixir from the onion layers of execution waste. And when there, at the core of effective technique, how you flow away in dexterity and perfect touch; so dreamlike!
With the old hand that you are as a seeker of technical efficiency, reaching to such reduced necessity so much better and quicker than decades ago.
However, I can´t resist galloping away with that perfected state of execution. Carried away by the musicality of seamlessness, and zap, there you go, enjoying produced sound instead of being efficient with improving yourself. As a sucker for sonics, unable to resist the beauty that ermeges from the enchanting wonder of a guitar.
And that while staying at the perfected exercise would not even being bothering to me or anything. In fact it is such a pleasure to then run accross the strings like a lemur through tree tops. Only that straying away with the fluency into musical sequence is even more of an entrapping pleasure. It is that you say to yourself like: "Just for a minute! Will be back right away." And so I find myself over and over again digressed into entertaining myself. Not for "a minute", but rather for 95% or more of the guitar time.
Hard to imagine where I would be if only able to control myself and stick to fluent exercising for at least a little bit more of the practising time.
On the one hand being persistant enough to keep fighting against a physical issue since years now; far from giving up and all in all rather succesfully sticking to overcoming it ... On the other hand lacking the discipline of not letting myself being carried away by sonic and musical temptation. It is downright compulsive. Just cannot withstand to play away.
Anybody else here familiar with the lovely Siren that lures you away to the shore of watered down progress? With the beauty of the instrument being too much for you to resist it for even just some minutes? Be embraced then, brother in crime and lover of irresistable sonic muse.
Ruphus
Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
I agree ruphus, as musicians this is a very difficult thing to deal with. We all love sound so much, it is to easy to start playing crazy stuff that we already know than to sit down and very disciplined like....work on our weaknesses. I have finally farted around enough....only maybe improving my technique? that i am finally starting to be able to sit down and do disciplined practice. I am really kicking myself though, i've put in a lot of time already and i'd be a lot further if i just focused. Even my techniques....i have practiced them a lot but only practicing through feeling and trying to feel what would be the most comfortable for my hands and the most repeatable....i guess that's ok but how will i ever know that i'm doing it right. But i have to be satisfied with what i've done with some of the techniques; because i really can't afford the time to change them now. Sure there are some techniques that would be new to me, i should def. work on those but i can't waste 3 years on them like i did alzapua, tremolo, some arpeggios and picado.
Also, you have to be satisfied at some time or another, because there is a huge variety of things to work on in music....and you need to spend a lot of time on all of them; and there is only so many hours before our hands tire....keep reminding yourself of the physical limitations and use that as your excuse to completely drop something and work on another thing.
At least i think that's what you're talking about haha.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
Yes, it is about such.
The point being efficiency. When you break away from exercising a very efficient way of execution, in order to then improvise with either your new ( but not yet established) skill, or worse even to play some stuff that you already know as you suggest ...
The outcome will be a much reduced progress ( as you "overwrite" the new achievement / water it down with your handicap), and thus over the years will have correspondingly less time for the exploration of all the blank spots in music / styles.
If one can resist the immediate temptation of breaking away and instead keep imprinting the new skill for a little more of praticsing time the efficiency of it will in the end path the way for overhead for whatever, be it your old repertoir ( with improved execution ) or the expansion into new fields and levels.
To give in into immediate temptation means an essential loss of what could have been gained. Or to say it the other way around: Being disciplined enough and keeping with executing correctly for even just some more minutes pays big time. -
And the weird thing is when a guy ( like me) aware about the difference between wasteful / hempered technique and ergonomical execution, as well as about the efficiency of focused / disciplined pratising still will keep breaking away.
Just because of being such a sucker for euphony. So much that you just got to jump on the horse of beauty before it being saddled, and gallop away. And when returning to the stable you find to have spent most of your session once again indulged into pleasure, but wasting the chance of progressing.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
Hi Ruphus.
I suppose that if you were to ask me again in a few months my opinion might be very different but just now I am enjoying this approach.
I like to take two bars that I find fascinating and beautiful from a piece I am working on (and if it is a great piece that might be any two bars) and then try and play it by ear in a different key in open position (ie new fingerings entirely not just moving up and down the neck).
Then when I have worked it out well enough I play it as slowly as I can with the metronome. Next I set the metronome progressively SLOWER and that is usually when interesting things start to happen.
I will then repeat the process in another key. And the next day/session a different passage or piece.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
Hi David,
Provided that in your example there is some new technique / way of execution involved, then that is an overall good way to procede. You concentrate on something, zoom into it, improving dexterity ( and hopefully will not reduce the learning effect afterwards by playing something with lesser refined routines from before ).
In my bad example ( they way I typically do) I would be riding those two bars for only a short while. Then, attracted by the nice new sound, I would break out, improvising some kind of music piece of it and finally throwing over board the new motoric path while making music, basically with old executing routines. Hence, retarding new achievements, or at least hindering their imprint / establishing.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
Hi Ruphus. The point is the transposition.
You play the same thing but the fingerings are completely different for both hands. Instead of indulging in aimless extemporisation refine both ear and technique by changing the key. Lots of problems to solve musically and technically, and just hard enough to stop the mind wandering and the fingers taking over.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
I get your point, however the effects can but must not necessarily meet the aspect I was after. ( The musical demand of it could even be counter productive to maintaining the physiological efficiency in the executed technique, like with the case I described above.)
In my example the core of the matter is how execution has been stripped of any needless neuronal or muscular engagement. And how one can get distracted from such perfect state and prevent its establishment.
I was dealing with something physical and much more basic than transposing, yet determining for all that follows. ( Except of for occasional talents who manage motoric efficiency innately.)
Posts: 15259
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
The irony here, perhaps, is that honestly, it's the technique that MAKES the sound. Especially in flamenco world. Folks that don't have it together and are into their "amazing sound" or whatever, usually in la la land. Practice makes permanent so, of course we all have things that are "wrong" that stick with us for years. That's why it is important to have a teacher or some peers to point out the trick to relearning something the "correct" way. Don't treat technique practice like it's some chore or non musical exercise...pretend it is a "dance" your hand is doing...TO the music.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
You havn´ read what I said. It is the correct techniques sound that makes me break out into further musical excursion. Yet, when out from the dedicated exercise there happens the return to technical imperfection.
Obviously I was meaning the situation when one already knows how the correct execution goes. Only that during practising I keep straying away into music, so that usually there will soon occure a return to established routine / prevent the imprint of the correct technique.
I enjoy my passion for beautiful sonics, but wished in the same time there was a bit more control over myself / discipline to stay with dedicated execution of correct technique.
If one will, much of old firmly habitual misconceptions can be erased and replaced by erogonomical technique within a few months or even just weeks. If one can´t hold back oneself however, there might be the carrying of a didactical gem with oneself for years while in the repertoir still executing the old routine. -
And besides, don´t know who your usuals are, but when I say "beautiful sound" then you can rely on that it is actually such. I can even hear that aspect in your touch and clearly distinguish how sonorous or lesser so it is.
My ears have more years of listening and appreciation on the counter than yours. Theory is all yours, but in view of sonics and touch there is no need for you to speculate on my judge. Good day, sir. >tips his hat and walks back into the saloon<
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
I posted some on AG forum, but never on the foro. Always disliked demonstrating to thirds ( no matter what subject, including those where teachers would keep asking me as preferred student), and since the time when I decided to unroll everything from scratch I don´t feel at all like playing for anyone. In fact I don´t even aim at making music. My goal being to tidy up motorics. It´s just that the beauty of the instrument drags me into fiddling around all the time.
With all that I guess you could be liking the sounds. Neighbours in the diverse places did at least, and friends anyway. ( I really am concerned about bothering others and try to be considerate, but specially in summer you can´t avoid being heard by close environment.) Maybe 2 years ago, concerned about the leakage in these miserable buildings, I asked the guy in the house behind mine wether he could be disturbed with my guitar playing until late night or even until morning hours. The man rather a bit of the rough kind surprised me with: "In the opposite, when I wake up I love hearing that wonderful sound."
And in the faster times before the technical revision, I received respect by conservatory players and pros, had invitations to make a record or play before VIPs like the Scorpions for instance ( which I all declined). Me is a closet player.
Anyway, don´t want to sound as if I was the shizznizz ( specially not now, with completely shrinked repertoir and yet some years of repair work before me), while being just a fakemenco / universal dilettant, but in terms of touch I suppose there are not too many players that could be urged to looking down on me. And why should they want to, unless it being Ricardo who seems a bit too spoiled by kind fellow members who don´t hear the difference between the greats and him whom they consider match.
Posts: 15259
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
quote:
And why should they want to, unless it being Ricardo who seems a bit too spoiled by kind fellow members who don´t hear the difference between the greats and him whom they consider match.
Well, you don't leave us much to go on with only your words...which as they stand sound as such: You have the superior ear to us all such that you alone (on this foro) can put me in my proper place underneath the greats, and have the discipline to practice exercises correctly while at the same time not having the discipline to make an "ergonomic" way to play your normal habit. Perhaps one day you will see the contradictions in your approach? Until then I guess we must simply enjoy your complaining.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
I am confused not necessarily by your prose, Ruphus, but by your main point. What is the difference between "galloping away with that perfected state of execution" and "being efficient with improving yourself"? What are exercises, anyway?
I know this isn't necessarily the most popular viewpoint, but I think most exercises are BS. Think about it for a second. Every single method book, filled to the brim with seemingly-useful exercises, was devised by a technically proficient guitarist who was taught using a different methodology which, by his estimation, the exercises in the books can approximate and thereby bring about technical proficiency. But how useful is that, really?
People are surprised when I say I have never once done picado exercises. The ONLY exercises I have ever done, divorced from a piece of music, are the Giuiliani arpeggios, and even those were of minimal use to me (but, BTW, arpeggios are massively helpful in improving picado technique).
The best way to practice is through music, or through a book like the Carcassi method, which doesn't focus on exercises as much as progressively-challenging, technique-oriented musical vignettes. Giving these sort of pieces to people who are starting out will keep their attention much more effectively than mindless exercises (which, if they focus on one particular technique, can result in hand injury if repeated excessively). I don't know. Speaking purely from personal experience -- both for myself as a guitarist and for my students -- exercises that are removed from musical context are rarely if ever useful.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
"Efficiency" means to gain max at minimum efforts.
I started out with the etxreme opposite. Nothing but playing. Admittedly, yet accidentally, largely technically correct / ergonomically at first. Later on I handicapped myslef however by going a basically other route, trying to copy some celebrity, thinking his awkward posture was the way to go
I find it interesting how you seem to not have noticed that one can drag basic misconception through a hole career. Possibly shoving a huge repertoire of music around and with it still technical misconceptions that will needlessly hamper, dramatically reducing the time / output ratio and seamlessness, and completely prevent certain individual skills.
Information is a highly efficient fuel to fill ones imagination with, and latest insights on physiology and neurology allow for corresponding progress.
If on the other hand detailed and accuarte knowledge was so useless, how have I then been able to produce lucky campers partially in only a few minutes. Like e.g. with a guitarist who was already 14 years or so gigging and who called me up days after I had made him aware about something on levering, which now suddenly allowed him a drastically improved posture and playing. ( Not all know-how can be realized that quickly, but the efficiency of well stuffed imagination is always extreme compared to more or less random approach and technically possible counter production.)
When preconditions are perfect, like when you are inspired by seamless players, or yourself being one of the talents that will execute economically by chance, then you might be doing pretty well without the little help through analytics.
But when there is no such perfect ideal in reach, knwoing why and how things happen is invaluable.
For, in all cases, the quality of imagination / anticipation makes for the most relevant point.
If projection about an execution is failed ( against physiology / ergonomics) you may execute a ttechnique in question for a million times and either progress very little, not at all, or even develop blockade, and in the opposite:
If projection is perfect, progress is a blink / efficiency at max.
Quoting myself for lazyness:
quote:
Modern didactics should know that success is all about correct imagination before actual action.
This insight also being behind todays mental training of for instance top athletes. Those are being trained to invision the action beforehand as detailed as possible. F1 pilots for instance drive through the course in mind, and such precisely at that that they reach the envisioned finish in mind, accurately down to milli seconds of the real thing.
From there, I believe that in the future proficiency like learning an instrument should become considerably different and more efficiently from today. Aside of possible physical methods like eventual transfers of informative bearers, or mechanical tools etc., which shall remain unconsidered here, projectionist means of imagination will advance considerably, showing great effect on learners.
This does not mean that you couldn´t have great didactics with max playing at min exercising, provided details / inspiration are perfect.
I personally, due to repairing, however do need exercising. Other I cannot remove established ineffciencies / malfunctions. Unrolling from scratch / reprogramming can only be done by exercising.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Bulerias2005)
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bulerias2005 What is the difference between "galloping away with that perfected state of execution" and "being efficient with improving yourself"?
When I gallop away I will play further into some musical stuff. When playing music however imprinted patterns will be taking over / me then leaving that "perfect state of execution". And with that re-enforce the old habit.
"Being efficient with improving" on the other hand means that you stick with the correct execution ( don´t let yourself get distracted ). Doing so for a while, so that new synaptical paths can be consolidated / the misconception be lastingly overwritten.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ruphus
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bulerias2005 What is the difference between "galloping away with that perfected state of execution" and "being efficient with improving yourself"?
When I gallop away I will play further into some musical stuff. When playing music however imprinted patterns will be taking over / me then leaving that "perfect state of execution". And with that re-enforce the old habit.
"Being efficient with improving" on the other hand means that you stick with the correct execution ( don´t let yourself get distracted ). Doing so for a while, so that new synaptical paths can be consolidated / the misconception be lastingly overwritten.
Ruphus
This is confusing to me -- technique and expression are intrinsically related, so the distinction between perfect technique and musical expression is arbitrary IMO.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
Is it really not to be understood or are you just pulling my leg?
The above was not about musical expression, but about correctly executed technique. You know, in the sense of not engaging muscles that are not being needed, not introducing superfluous angles, not firing impulses vainly in physiologically blocked situations, etc.
So, imagine you had focused on everything and were now executing ergonomically efficient. ( Which besides feels fantastic!) And all you that is left to do is to keep executing that way for a while, so that the not yet established routine may be imprinted in your grey cells. However, if you for whatever reason will execute for only a short moment, and then re-introduce your habitual, dysfunctional way of executing this technique ... the ergomomical way of doing it will not replace the wrong routine. ( Hence, you are then being counter productive to the correction.)
If it may still not be understood, someone please help me with getting it accross per Mandarin Chinese or maybe in Suahili.
And should I have been made to type this just for giggles, lightning shall strike you on the loo. :O/
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
technique mmh, Efficiency mmh, movement hmm. si no tienes sonikete, pa' qué te metes?
sorry ruphus, but i don't really think, flamenco is only about movements and technique. If you're thinking that, you probably haven't understand anything.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
You behave like those boneheads at the introduction of locomotives.
Can you show me where I claimed flamenco is "only about technique"? No?
But I could show you how you reject valid information, if I only cared enough.
Me is always interested in exchange of useful bits, provided them being appreciated. But I am not interested in spoon feeding to who for whatever reason does not want to see.
You keep thinking that just going through advancing material will suffice. That there could be no detour and awkwardedness occuring that you be dragging through your career, no wasted efforts and no better way. That is alright with me. Really.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
quote:
You keep thinking that just going through advancing material will suffice.
really? Haha you thinking I'm learning the song Soniquete from Paco or what? No, that's the famous letra from soniquete.
I really think you don't have an idea about flamenco. make a video of some bulerías falsetas, and maybe i will change my opinion of you. But you're for me just one more guy who makes things a bit too complicated.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
Look, teenager; you can go out there and estimate things without having done anything beforehand for expanding your cognitive skills. That is your choice.
But if you think to suffice already for judgment without precondition, at least refrain from calling names who you don´t understand. Ignorance is no merit to worship.
I have seen not a single constructive or informing post from you. Only icons like that and pertness comments.
Folks here aren´t your premature dummies. Try to behave like you would if we were present at your place. Try to find out what style is.
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ruphus
Is it really not to be understood or are you just pulling my leg?
The above was not about musical expression, but about correctly executed technique. You know, in the sense of not engaging muscles that are not being needed, not introducing superfluous angles, not firing impulses vainly in physiologically blocked situations, etc.
So, imagine you had focused on everything and were now executing ergonomically efficient. ( Which besides feels fantastic!) And all you that is left to do is to keep executing that way for a while, so that the not yet established routine may be imprinted in your grey cells. However, if you for whatever reason will execute for only a short moment, and then re-introduce your habitual, dysfunctional way of executing this technique ... the ergomomical way of doing it will not replace the wrong routine. ( Hence, you are then being counter productive to the correction.)
If it may still not be understood, someone please help me with getting it accross per Mandarin Chinese or maybe in Suahili.
And should I have been made to type this just for giggles, lightning shall strike you on the loo. :O/
Ruphus
Your scenario assumes that one already has a "habitual, dysfunctional way of executing" technique, which seems to imply that when one's focus is not squarely on technique (and, perhaps, like I reasonably assumed you were trying to say, musical expression), 'perfect' technique falls by the wayside. This is what's confusing to me. Note that you yourself brought up "being carried away by sonic and musical temptation"... how is it unreasonable to assume that you were referring to a more expressive way of playing?
There's no need to translate your post to Mandarin Chinese, but English would be fine (or perhaps Russian? )
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
Your postings show that you feel threatend by the eventualiyt that any or some of your understandings could be turning out questionable. Instead of trying to insult me with bits like that my language was not English*, I would had preferred if you explained what you are concerned about. (* Maybe your are not too firm with it, yet?)
To the foolish premisse of `just do like you feel suits best´:
I come form a physical art where -more than in any other discipline- there is shown how todays civilisatory individual has been alienated from natural motorics. ( And how large-scaled it is to lead the average person back to natural / physicallly conclusive coordination of his body.)
But one does not need to be a specialist for to have taken notion of reports about todays youth´s physical clumsiness as consequence of lacking playgrounds / routines of lives on the couch, etc.
Assumption in the way of that students would just execute ergonomically if only shown a technique, makes me wonder whether we live in the same world. Because rather common is an awkward approach with way too many engagements of muscle aparatus, blockage, angles and strain. And how could it not with youngsters who meanwhile don´t only fail with simple body control like walking, balancing etc., but recently are even being reported as awkward with hand writing.
In the same time we don´t need to go into todays extremes, and will find ergonomical lacking already with preceding generations. A majority of guitar players who practise since decades, all in all and unfortunately highly inefficiently. After all those years still not fluent, hasting, missing notes, clamping barrés, etc. ( Dominated by the instrument, instead of the opposite way around.)
This while you can have a player on concert level after only a short time, like say 2 to 3 years ( provided his passionate engagement, naturally).
As I mentioned above, in contrast you can have the case with talented individuals who will be quite efficient / ergonomical innately. You can also have the case of someone, regardless of talent, inspired to functional progress by the seamlessness of his surrounding. Like lucky people who may learn in Gitano communities, or otherwise musical families.
Such examples may not need to have their imagination built up with detailed information about economical execution, as they are being inspired by good example already ( finding efficiency unconsciously through mirroring).
For the vast rest of guitar aficionados however, chances are more than not of starting out with routines of minor body control.
And thus it would be a gift to them to be provided with either inspiring example, as much of detail on ergonomics as possible, or even both.
I have given examples above that show once again how important useful anticipation is to the quality of execution ( in all disciplines). I don´t know why anyone would doubt it, or wanting to assume that everyone´s random posture and idle motorics were to be ergonomical. Truth is that what might be feeling most comfortable right now at random state, might well be your future obstacle in playing an instrument.
What is up with that kind of silly rejection of simple wordly facts? Do you want your playing career to have been optimally unrolled in the aftermath? Do you feel threatend by the hypothetical possibility that it could have been more efficient? Or are you of the talents that luckily and innately progressed with good efforts-to-results-ratio, and now think such would be common if only students were let executing however they feel right at a given moment?
Why then are all those top athletes being trained and that with increasing focus on imagination of how to unroll? Why can guys like Prof. Chen spill out guitar prodigies in a row?
All worthless bits, only because of the defending of your misunderstanding belly button?
If it can´t even be agreed on such basic and obvious circumstances, how could we ever build a dog kennel together? ( Guess that would turn out an aquarium or so.)
RE: The fool in me carried away by t... (in reply to Ruphus)
As soon as I've become competent in one falseta or scale, I move on to learning something entirely new. It seems to me that, when I then revisit what I had previously learnt to a satisfactory level, I'm even better at it.
I worked on nothing but arpeggios for a month and my progress reached a plateau after about 4 weeks. Then I went about conquering flicked rasgueados. When my rasgueados sounded good, I miraculously could then rip P-I-M-A-M-I arpeggios in the few exercises I was learning just as quickly as my teacher. It just "clicks" one day, probably from the rasgueado practice building up muscles that get neglected in weeks-long focus on one particular technique. They then help the arpeggio technique, and visa-versa.