Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
|
Navarro Student 2 Flamenco
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login  | |
|
   
gj Michelob
Posts: 1531
Joined: Nov. 7 2008
From: New York City/San Francisco
|
 RE: Navarro Student 2 Flamenco (in reply to bluesbuster)
|
|
|
quote:
That was a quick sale, must be a great guitar
There was once a thread about which of the many properties and aspects we consider chiefly when evaluating/acquiring a guitar.
I remember how Don Soledad [who owns an enviable collection of prominent makers' guitars] wrote that he deemed 'Playability' the most important element -while sound and aesthetics were secondary.
When it comes to playability, this Navarro Student was the 'easiest' guitar to play I had ever found, while -incidentally– having a more than a decent sound, in terms of both volume and of that woodsy, percussive quality I seek in a guitar. It was however, luthier-adjusted a few times until my own specifications were met. I sold it [along with its sister I kept in NY –this was my SF guitar- when I moved on to steel strings].
As David, at GSI had recommended –and I wish I would heed such prudent counsel more often- when you grow tired of a guitar you love, do not sell it, rather, store it in your attic [a temperature controlled attic, one would hope]. A few months or year later you will be amazed to rediscover its beauty. But remember –he warned quoting Pepe Romero- that guitars may be angry at you after being neglected for a while, and it may take some 'dating' before they respond properly again :-)
This Navarro may be really upset, but I will make sure there will be flowers and good wine in the room when she 'returns' home, next week.
_____________________________
gj Michelob
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 20 2013 22:02:39
 |
|
jeff_hatcher
Posts: 46
Joined: Aug. 26 2012
|
|
RE: Navarro Student 2 Flamenco (in reply to TANúñez)
|
|
|
quote:
it may take some 'dating' before they respond properly again :-)
It's true! an instrument that doesn't get played "goes to sleep" (my term for it). I worked for a guy who ran a violin shop when I was younger, who claimed that when an instrument isn't played, numerous small, weak chemical bonds form in the structure of the wood that begin to limit vibration. The longer the instrument sits, the more bonds form. When the instrument is played regularly, these weak bonds break and the wood begins to vibrate more freely. You would notice that when we first got violins into the shop (he had a passion for older violins... usually these old factory made german instruments and sears and robucks models that were rather popular with bluegrass crowd), they would sound stiff and nasally. After playing the instrument for an hour or two, it would dramatically loosen up and start to acquire a more clear, singing, resonant tone. If we played it in for a couple of days, it would kind of hit its peak. Let the instrument sit for a month or so, and the tone would die away again.
Later, as I started taking courses in biochemistry, his theory made more sense. The structure of proteins and other biological molecules are strongly influenced by weak chemical bonds such as van der waals forces, hydrophobic/hydrophilic interactions, hydrogen bonds, and polar bonds. These bonds, individually, are not as strong as covalent bonds (atoms sharing valence electrons) or ionic bonds (such as form salt crystals), but by the sheer number that are made stabilize the structure of proteins.
When an instrument sits idle, the wood will seek its lowest energy state (chemically) by formation of these weak bonds (long discussion). As these bonds start to accumulate, the freedom with which the wood can vibrate is limited. The longer the instrument sits unplayed, the more these bonds can accumulate, up until the point where the the lowest energy available in the local environment of these bonds are achieved.
Playing an instrument injects kinetic energy into the structure of the wood, which would disrupt most of these weak bonds. Once broken, it can take time for these bonds to reform, so constant playing keeps the wood "limber".
There has been some research on this topic. I am looking for the original journal articles for this post in the New York Times, but haven't found it yet. The times article:
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/02/27/science/when-violinists-play-their-violins-improve.html
Some related web articles,journal articles and abstracts:
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsms1963/41/461/41_461_164/_article
http://www.afm.asso.fr/Accueil/Actualit%C3%A9s/tabid/317/ArticleId/381/Viscoelasticity-of-wood-under-humidity-variation-modelling-the-effect-of-transient-hydrogen-bonding.aspxhttp://liutaiomottola.com/myth/played.htm
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Apr. 21 2013 14:13:36
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.078125 secs.
|
Printable Version
