Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





RE: New vs Old   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: <<   <   5 6 7 [8] 9    >   >>
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
XXX

Posts: 4400
Joined: Apr. 14 2005
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Ron.M

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron.M

quote:

Ron.M - As I've said three times already I do not mind the advertising on the forum


The difference is that you seem to see "normal" posts as "advertising and I just see them as normal posts.


He probably means not or not only only posts but the banner on top of the page.

_____________________________

Фламенко
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 13:59:42
 
Ron.M

Posts: 7051
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Scotland

RE: New vs Old (in reply to XXX

quote:

but the banner on top of the page


Ah!

But that is Simon's advert for his DVD and he's allowed to advertise on his own site!
Anders is just the unpaid extra.

"One day you'll be a Star my boy...just sign here..."

cheers,

Ron
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 15:08:16
 
XXX

Posts: 4400
Joined: Apr. 14 2005
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Ron.M

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron.M

quote:

but the banner on top of the page


Ah!

But that is Simon's advert for his DVD and he's allowed to advertise on his own site!
Anders is just the unpaid extra.


of course, Ron
But really, i think everybody knows how an advert looks like no need to discuss on this.

_____________________________

Фламенко
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 15:59:06
 
Ron.M

Posts: 7051
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Scotland

RE: New vs Old (in reply to XXX

quote:

i think everybody knows how an advert looks like


Yeah, Deniz..

Like your advert for Spanish Chopped Tomatoes you have on EVERY ONE of your posts.

cheers,

Ron
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 16:04:19
 
TANúñez

Posts: 2559
Joined: Jul. 10 2003
From: TEXAS

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Ron.M

So after 8 pages of discussions, have we come to the answer of what is better, new or old?

_____________________________

Tom Núñez
www.instagram.com/tanunezguitars
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 19:01:23
 
malakka

 

Posts: 170
Joined: Jan. 14 2009
 

[Deleted] 

Post has been moved to the Recycle Bin at Jan. 28 2011 20:19:44
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 19:15:03
 
Ron.M

Posts: 7051
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Scotland

RE: New vs Old (in reply to TANúñez

quote:

So after 8 pages of discussions, have we come to the answer of what is better, new or old?




Ah, Tom....it's the old saying...

"It's not reaching the destination that really matters, but the adventure in trying to get there..."

(We must have countless threads like this in the archives now.. )

cheers,

Ron
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 19:27:45
 
Arash

Posts: 4495
Joined: Aug. 9 2006
From: Iran (living in Germany)

RE: New vs Old (in reply to TANúñez

quote:

ORIGINAL: TANúñez

So after 8 pages of discussions, have we come to the answer of what is better, new or old?


yes we have.........the answer is : not too old, but also not brand new

let say 70s to 90s (specially Condes )

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 20:41:24
 
Ron.M

Posts: 7051
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Scotland

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Arash

quote:

not too old, but also not brand new


Well Arash... a few years ago, I sold a 1971 Ramirez 1A Blanca and used the dough to buy a second-hand Bernal Blanca, plus a brand new Anders Eliasson Negra (well..mainly because I saw the ad at the top of the page..that's the main thing that influenced me to make my decision )

cheers,

Ron
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 20:53:25
 
kuqi

 

Posts: 8
Joined: Jan. 5 2008
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Ron.M

Dear Ron,

don't be enbarreseed my friend - you and many more have been influenced by these adverts...but at least you don't join the many who kill discussions with 'buy an Anders...'
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 21:37:22
 
XXX

Posts: 4400
Joined: Apr. 14 2005
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Ron.M

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron.M
(well..mainly because I saw the ad at the top of the page..that's the main thing that influenced me to make my decision )


oh you got the guitar in exchange for the ad? <-- please note the smiley.

_____________________________

Фламенко
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 28 2011 21:41:11
 
estebanana

Posts: 9351
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to XXX

If I were to take an eight string Brahms guitar by David Rubio and make a plan of it and publish the plan, I could go around saying this is an homage to the great master Rubio. But how would people feel if I continually branded myself with the Rubio guitar by going into discussion sites and associating my name with the plan? Yes I can teach you to make the Faulk-Rubio Brahms guitar and if you can't build a guitar or afford to purchase my copy, which by the way will be a valuable collectors item, my associate in Pakistan can make one for your for 3500.00 instead of my 10,000 dollar price.

Then continue ad naseum to post for several months about the attributes of the Faulk-Rubio Brahms guitar, ( doubly branding myself with both Brahms and Rubio in one fast hyphen) How would people react to that? And if someone said hey that looks kinda fishy that you are claiming this to be an homage, yet you take delight and no shame in signifying off the deceased masters name. Would you agree or disagree with this persons opinion?

To make another analogy, what If I were to do the same thing with a Dammann double top guitar? Since Dammann is still alive and around my own age that would be quite cheeky don't you think? If I were to go around in chat rooms saying hey I make this Dammann double top copy and you can buy the plan. I don't make any money off the plan because it's an homage to the master Dammann, but in fact the plan is known as the Faulk-Dammann plan. Again I would be branding myself with a top blue chip name and concurrently claiming it was purely an homage. Clever no?

So if I added to my branding off Dammann's name and the Faulk-Dammann (double German names in fact it could sound really seriously artsy) model plan that I make the Faulk-Dammann plan for 8500.00 but if you can't afford one my man Afdash in Lahore Pakistan can make one for 4000.00.

What if I took that act to one of the classical guitar discussion groups where those fine builders who make their own versions of double tops talk with players about guitars. How long to you think it would be before that act got shot down? I bet there are some fairly irascible classical builders who would not like that one bit.

Yet for pointing out the 900 pound elephant (or white gorrilla) in the room I get treated like I'm some rabid dog biting people? All I did point at the emperors new clothes and say look everyone he's half naked!

There's making an homage and there is being commercial, and often they overlap. There is a point at which a disparity is created between an homage which serves to honor a master and an homage which begins to broadcast commercial messages. When that threshold is reached the homage begins to look disingenuous. For some people that seems ok and to others it seems unethical.

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 0:02:47
 
Andy Culpepper

Posts: 3023
Joined: Mar. 30 2009
From: NY, USA

RE: New vs Old (in reply to estebanana

quote:

continue ad naseum to post




_____________________________

Andy Culpepper, luthier
http://www.andyculpepper.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 1:55:33
 
cathulu

Posts: 950
Joined: Dec. 15 2006
From: Vancouver, Canukistan

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Andy Culpepper

This thread has gone way to personal - I hope nobody has been overly offended.

Thank god people can look past the personalities and see a good guitar when it is handed to them. We don't have to be friends with the luthier, that is a blessing. It is just a money transaction after all.

So nobody should worry, it will be alright. This too shall pass.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 6:52:00
 
krichards

Posts: 597
Joined: Jan. 14 2007
From: York, England

RE: New vs Old (in reply to cathulu

quote:

It is just a money transaction after all.


Oh no its not!

When you buy a guitar from the guy that built it you enter into a relationship. Usually, thats a friendship that can be long lasting.

Not the same when you buy a factory guitar from a shop: thats just a money transaction

_____________________________

Kevin Richards

http://www.facebook.com/#!/kevin.richards.1048554
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 7:29:27
 
Kubase

Posts: 72
Joined: May 20 2009
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to krichards

quote:

Yet for pointing out the 900 pound elephant (or white gorrilla) in the room I get treated like I'm some rabid dog biting people?


It's probably not the point you are making, rather how you are making it.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 8:14:45
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to kuqi

quote:

Dear Ron,

don't be enbarreseed my friend - you and many more have been influenced by these adverts...but at least you don't join the many who kill discussions with 'buy an Anders...'


¿Whats your problem and what are you trying to say?

Instead of stupid cynical posts, come on and say what you want to say. Besides, I can see on your profile that your last post was 3 years ago. Did you wait 3 years in order to post a message which is mainly just empty and insulting? Take another couple of years of break.

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 8:43:07
 
prd1

 

Posts: 206
Joined: Jul. 11 2007
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Kubase

...not quite so nice.

If his 'ass' had of been black of of pakistani origin most folk would be disgusted by racist attacks - but as he's an English guy it's all fine and dandy?

yeeeeeee-ha...

_____________________________

Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who could not hear the music - Angela Monet
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 10:43:39
 
Ron.M

Posts: 7051
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Scotland

RE: New vs Old (in reply to estebanana

Hi estebanana,

Well, I don't know all the ins and outs of the Luthery business, but surely if someone is looking for a good copy of an old master and you hear of someone who can do it well and is also enthusiastic about the design...and you are willing to pay the $10,000 or whatever asking price...then what's wrong with that?

I don't know if Tom B goes around putting down new designs or innovations of other builders on the guitar builder's forums on the net...if he does, then that would be wrong IMO.

But if he is just generally enthusiastic about the old designs and explains and enthuses on his reasons why....then what's wrong with that?

Anyway, it hardly seems to be a big commercial enterprise at only 2 guitars a year. More like a dedicated hobby.

There are some amateur Flamenco guitar fans who just spend all their time learning and playing all Paco's stuff. If that's all they want to do, then good luck to them.
It's hardly harming Paco.

cheers,

Ron
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 11:55:23
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to XXX

Ron

Your last post shows me that basiccaly you havent understood anything of what has been going on on the Luthiers section for the past 2 1/2 years.

I´ve tried to explain many times why there sometimes are such hard arguments and tough vibes between some of us (Read Tom Blackshear versus me and others). But I can see on the way this thread is turning that I could equally have been talking to the mule which is grassing behind my house. Would have been more fun to

To Estebanana:
You forgot one thing: If you make a copy of mr X guitars and promote your self with it, Remember to put it VERY CLEAR that mr X is the best guitarbuilder in the world and that you personally have improved his design. The go on for a couple of years talking out LOUDLY about this every time some other design is being discussed. Saying in xx posts that building anything else than your improved copy of the best guitar in the world is a total waste of time and only for stupid persons.

Only this way you could earn a place which would be on TomB´s level.

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 12:33:01
 
Tom Blackshear

 

Posts: 2304
Joined: Apr. 15 2008
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Ron.M

quote:

But if he is just generally enthusiastic about the old designs and explains and enthuses on his reasons why....then what's wrong with that?


I'll break my silence here for a moment and say I just heard a very interesting guitar played by Grisha at GSI in California. The guitar was made by a Israeli named Erez Perelman, and I have to say that it sounded very flamenco and very old school, imo.

http://www.guitarsalon.com/product.php?productid=3664 and scroll down to the video.

_____________________________

Tom Blackshear Guitar maker
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 12:36:55
 
XXX

Posts: 4400
Joined: Apr. 14 2005
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Tom Blackshear

Is that Grishas composition?

_____________________________

Фламенко
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 12:39:35
 
Arash

Posts: 4495
Joined: Aug. 9 2006
From: Iran (living in Germany)

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Tom Blackshear

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Blackshear


I'll break my silence here for a moment


Don't be so shy Tom.
Please tell us more about the Reyes Plan

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 12:47:45
 
Tom Blackshear

 

Posts: 2304
Joined: Apr. 15 2008
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to XXX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deniz

Is that Grishas composition?



I don't know about Grisha's music, which is always good, but what I posted is about the guitar's sound and how impressive it was, with its fast attack and strong bell like qualities. And being that the guitar is only $4,500 at GSI, this price places it in a more attractive price range for most players.

The guitar has a certain propio sello that stands out among many guitars that I hear today. And on top of that, it has a strong inner voice in the mid range that holds well for rasgueado; almost like a freight train :-)

It seems he learned well, some of the flamenco building techniques from Eugene Clark, a very fine old-school builder in Tacoma Washington.

_____________________________

Tom Blackshear Guitar maker
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 13:05:33
 
prd1

 

Posts: 206
Joined: Jul. 11 2007
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Arash

Not sure who said - 'no publicity is bad publicity'

Tom - I've got the Reyes plan that seems to have caused so much animosity (see quote above!!!) - I don't want to shoot the messanger - but what is the purpose of the bridge plate? This is the only plan that I have that includes a bridge plate like this - please understand that I don't have a vast collection of plans, mostly those from the book by Roy Courtnall and a couple of others from LMI (Sabicas 5 strutt Barbero etc...).

I treat guitar plans in much he same way as I treat tab - I can follow a Blackshear plan or a Faucher transcription - but it's not going to make me play or build with better feeling - they're only a guideline - if we could all build guitars to the standard of the luthiers on this site, their guitars would not command the prices and result in the waiting lists that they do...but most of us can only aspire to that - keep it up guys - get working and get those waiting lists down!!!!

_____________________________

Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who could not hear the music - Angela Monet
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 13:39:39
 
Andy Culpepper

Posts: 3023
Joined: Mar. 30 2009
From: NY, USA

RE: New vs Old (in reply to XXX

Let me give an example of how the Reyes plan has helped me.

Let me also say that if Tom B did modify the plan in some way and it's not stated on the plan, then that does bother me. The fact that he "idealized the shape" of the top and back to match doesn't bother me very much.

I have both the Reyes plan and the Sabicas Barbero plan in the shop but I have never built either of them. However I have studied them, and noticed that the braces on the Reyes are smaller on one side of the guitar. I also noticed that on the Barbero plan, the treble bridge wing is .5 mm lower than the bass (this might have something to do with the angled harmonic bar).
Anyway, I decided to try on my next build shaving the treble side braces down very slightly more than the bass, and scraping the treble bridge wing down an extra .5 mm. I was very happy with the results of that guitar and I'm doing the same thing on my current one. If this one is good in the same way I'll keep doing it.

So basically I'm very happy the plans were there just to give me some small insight into the thinking of two master guitar makers, which in turn benefitted my guitar making. I'm grateful to Tom for that.

_____________________________

Andy Culpepper, luthier
http://www.andyculpepper.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 14:02:24
 
Andy Culpepper

Posts: 3023
Joined: Mar. 30 2009
From: NY, USA

RE: New vs Old (in reply to XXX

As far as advertising is concerned, get real.
All the luthiers on this list are getting their name out there by being here. That's not the only reason we're on here, but if you think you're making a good product, why not tell people about it.
I've been on this forum for almost 2 years, and the person that's made an impression on me the most as "advertising" is Anders. Let's face it, this is Anders' forum. I'm cool with that because I respect Anders and he clearly deserved his reputation here, as annoying as the built-in PR machine can sometimes be. I'm happy for Anders and I like what he stands for.
I truly don't think Tom goes in the for the heavy self-promotion. Half the time he jumps on here (which is rarely), he's touting some other builder such as Navarro (that I did find a little strange actually). I think he's genuinely excited about the old masters and just enjoys building and talking about them. He's not pulling a Kenny Hill and getting his copies mass produced in China, or, as far as I know, Pakistan. But maybe there is something I have missed. Anyway, that's all I have to say. Peace out

_____________________________

Andy Culpepper, luthier
http://www.andyculpepper.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 14:12:33
 
TANúñez

Posts: 2559
Joined: Jul. 10 2003
From: TEXAS

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Tom Blackshear

quote:

I'll break my silence here for a moment and say I just heard a very interesting guitar played by Grisha at GSI in California. The guitar was made by a Israeli named Erez Perelman, and I have to say that it sounded very flamenco and very old school, imo.

http://www.guitarsalon.com/product.php?productid=3664 and scroll down to the video.


This Perelman is very nice. I had never heard of him before. It reminds me a lot of a Shelton-Farretta. I appreciate these old school sounding guitars. It's nice to hear a guitar like this in a time when a lot of instruments are built in a more modern style.

_____________________________

Tom Núñez
www.instagram.com/tanunezguitars
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 14:37:44
 
kuqi

 

Posts: 8
Joined: Jan. 5 2008
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to Ron.M

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron.M

Well Arash... a few years ago, I sold a 1971 Ramirez 1A Blanca and used the dough to buy a second-hand Bernal Blanca, plus a brand new Anders Eliasson Negra (well..mainly because I saw the ad at the top of the page..that's the main thing that influenced me to make my decision )

cheers,

Ron


Ron - please accept my appologies - in hindsight I think you were making an English joke regarding buying the Anders?

Anders - I have many problems but not any that I would wish to share on a luthiery forum with you! Thamks for taking the time to check my history.

I joined the forum many years ago - at the time the forum discussted many topics relevent to the Oud - now it seems to be a popularity contest? I'm not on anyones side - not yours, estabananias, Toms or anyone elses - everyone has their opinion, each is valid...

I didn't realise that I had to make an opinion to every topic in order to have acceptability when I do make a post...I'll now go back under the stone from which I crawled out from, as requested.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 15:32:52
 
Tom Blackshear

 

Posts: 2304
Joined: Apr. 15 2008
 

RE: New vs Old (in reply to prd1

quote:

what is the purpose of the bridge plate? This is the only plan that I have that includes a bridge plate like this


If you are building a copy of a master plan, then use what they build with. There are other makers that use a bridge strap; Ramirez, Barbero, Hernandez y Aguado, etc. I have a '51 Barbero top plan with an extended thin strap across the top. I think the position to take is to use the master plan with whatever is the norn for the original maker.

I have used a Hauser style bridge strap on a 1917 Santos classical design and it worked well with that slight modification.

The bridge is essentially the stiffner for the top but a strap can lend a certain stability to its core. One thing I'll share is that some flamenco guitar makers would dig out some wood under the bridge to promote a faster pull up and tightness to the playing action, and the strap addition could have lent some replacement to the loss of wood for this particular technique. The strap would also hide certain tone adjustment techniques like this.

I was able to identify this particular technique when I had the 1957 Hernandez y Aguado bridge off, many years ago.

_____________________________

Tom Blackshear Guitar maker
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 29 2011 15:43:48
Page:   <<   <   5 6 7 [8] 9    >   >>
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: <<   <   5 6 7 [8] 9    >   >>
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.078125 secs.