Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





Solera specs ???   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1] 2    >   >>
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
satvic

Posts: 20
Joined: Jan. 17 2007
From: Seville, Spain

Solera specs ??? 

I think I've read everything I found online about how to make a solera. The problem is different sources tell different things. This diagram is what I came up with so far ...

Can you please recommend proper specs for a, b, c with these in mind:
1. Lowest amount of buzz possible while at 2.5mm at the 12th fret
2 10-11mm between the top and the strings at the bridge (don't know what that distance is called. Found out I can't play certain Spanish made guitars due to nails constantly catching the top)
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 9 2010 1:50:08
 
Andy Culpepper

Posts: 3023
Joined: Mar. 30 2009
From: NY, USA

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

Hi satvic,
Well, your first question is a little hard to quantify. It's entirely possible to get to 3/2.5 action and have just the right amount of buzz. I'll measure my solera a bit today and get back to you.

I'd say the 2-3 mm of dome is too much. I'd go with about 1.6 mm max. .065 inches (about 1.6 mm) across a guitar works out to about a 25 foot radius curve. So you can make yourself a 25' radius block to do the final sanding of the workboard and check that it's evenly curved. The block should be about 20" long, maybe 2" wide and 3" tall.

On your #1 you might not end up with the string height at the bridge that you want. Its kind of a trial and error thing on the first few.

_____________________________

Andy Culpepper, luthier
http://www.andyculpepper.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 9 2010 12:30:13
 
Jeff Highland

 

Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

How much Doming you want is a personal choice, but I agree with Andy 2-3mm is excessive. I went with the Courtnal book on this and used 2mm maximum.
I also used his recommended 3mm falloff from body junction to end of neck
However, this is only a starting point to get you in the ballpark.
You can always shim the end of the neck to reduce forward tilt, it is harder to increase it

You need to realise that setting bridge height and action is done not just by setting up the solera initially but by tweaking the neck angle at the time you glue on the back, taking into account doming height, desired string height at the bridge, 12 fret string height, fretboard thickness, fret height etc.
Fairly easy to do once you get your head around the geometry.
I guess the main point is, if you want a particular bridge string height, you have to take control of it hather than just trusting to solera measurements.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 9 2010 21:38:07
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

quote:

ORIGINAL: satvic

I think I've read everything I found online about how to make a solera. The problem is different sources tell different things. This diagram is what I came up with so far ...


Satvic, don't let anyone decide your dome height for you. I've made several soleras using different dimensions and found the ideal dome height for me is 3mm. What you do with the bracing, top thickness and tapering of the top is all relative to the amount of doming you use. 3mm is not at all uncommon in classics but usually less is used for flamencos. All these measurements must be right with each other to get the correct deflection of the neck (in my case about 1.5mm). If you use less doming you may have to use more deflection. Its what makes guitar making so fascinating and each maker's guitars so individual.

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 9 2010 22:59:13
 
rodpacheco

 

Posts: 80
Joined: Apr. 19 2010
From: Mexico

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

hey Satvic, how are you?

I have used 3mm for the dome, taking into account that the lower brace had a 1.5 - 2mm "radius", on a flat neck with internal reinforcement. The action that I have gotten was pretty much what your striving for: 2.8mm at 12th fret, and 9.5 at bridge height. The Feel was great for me. Although I tapered the fretboard from 6mm at nut, to 5mm at 12th fret, and a little more from the 12th to the soundhole. I really liked that set up.

On the other hand, now I am trying to give the neck a 2 - 3mm relief (YOUR C's??), striving for a more geometrical fretboard and the ability to have more control over the final set up which ever it's decided. You can always reduce the relief of the neck at the solera by putting a shim when you glue the back to the neck, to let´s say take it from 3mm to 2 o 1.5mm etc. At the end, as they have mentioned, it´s experimenting with this that will develop the guitar you envision and the method you are most satisfied with.

The best of lucks,
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 9 2010 23:43:04
 
rodpacheco

 

Posts: 80
Joined: Apr. 19 2010
From: Mexico

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to rodpacheco

Quoting my grandma: "...everyone has their own Technic for killing fleas!" Go for it!!
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 9 2010 23:49:29
 
satvic

Posts: 20
Joined: Jan. 17 2007
From: Seville, Spain

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

Thank you guys ! I do think those above specs were possibly for a classical...

1. So, based on the above review, can I assume these are safe to begin with for the 1st one?

2. Now it seems to me, the 3mm neck falloff (c) would lower the string height at the bridge ...

[ image removed ]
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 3:28:16
 
Jeff Highland

 

Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

the 3mm fallof for the neck is the wrong way round . the nut end of the neck should be forward of the body plane.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 7:58:51
 
Escribano

Posts: 6415
Joined: Jul. 6 2003
From: England, living in Italy

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to Jeff Highland

quote:

the 3mm fallof for the neck is the wrong way round . the nut end of the neck should be forward of the body plane.


The neck angle is away from the front of the soundboard. Here is how Anders does it with some shims. The soundboard is face down here.



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Foro Flamenco founder and Admin
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 9:43:20
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to Escribano

quote:

ORIGINAL: Escribano

The neck angle is away from the front of the soundboard. Here is how Anders does it with some shims. Obviously, the soundboard is face down here. The heel and sides will hold the neck in this position.


Wrong...the neck angle (deflection) is exactly at Satvic diagrammed it. Anders is not setting the neck angle in the picture. You do that when you attach the back.

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 14:20:12
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

quote:

ORIGINAL: satvic

1. So, based on the above review, can I assume these are safe to begin with for the 1st one?

2. Now it seems to me, the 3mm neck falloff (c) would lower the string height at the bridge ...


That's exactly what the neck deflection is for. When you put a straight edge on the top of the fingerboard it should line up about half way up the bridge height. Without the deflection the bridge would need to be too tall. It also has a profound effect on the playability of the guitar. You'll understand it better once you have built one.

I think you are taking the right approach but the 3mm neck deflection might be too much. Its safer to use less since you can always taper the fingerboard if you need more and it will look and work fine. Back tapering can be done if the neck is over deflected but that can look pretty ugly on the finished guitar.

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 14:30:24
 
Escribano

Posts: 6415
Joined: Jul. 6 2003
From: England, living in Italy

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to jshelton5040

quote:

Anders is not setting the neck angle in the picture. You do that when you attach the back.


Sorry I wasn't using the right words - I filmed Anders deflecting the neck backwards from the soundboard i.e. the opposite of that described by Jeff and therefore agreeing with Satvic. I'll get my coat

_____________________________

Foro Flamenco founder and Admin
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 15:29:44
 
satvic

Posts: 20
Joined: Jan. 17 2007
From: Seville, Spain

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

good thing I checked with you guys first :) So, here are the revised specs for my 1st solera I'm ready to make. Please advise these specs are safe for me to arrive to 2.5mm "no buzz" action and 10mm string height at the bridge

[ image removed ]
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 15:40:18
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

quote:

ORIGINAL: satvic

good thing I checked with you guys first :) So, here are the revised specs for my 1st solera I'm ready to make. Please advise these specs are safe for me to arrive to 2.5mm "no buzz" action and 10mm string height at the bridge


This drawing is wrong. Your first drawing showing the neck swinging upward is correct. If you use 1.6 mm doming you should probably use about 2mm upward deflection in the neck. It never comes out the way its supposed to anyway so plan on doing some tapering of the fingerboard.

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 15:53:44
 
satvic

Posts: 20
Joined: Jan. 17 2007
From: Seville, Spain

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

Thank you Jon!!! corrected. I assume it's the final version and get to work? :)



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

Attachment (1)
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 16:58:46
 
r0bbie

 

Posts: 160
Joined: Feb. 11 2007
From: Holland

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

Hi,

If this last picture is correct then the bridge would need to be bigger then when there is no angle at all.

When this is the right way I can start over again... But I checked the drawings and to me it seems the nut end of the neck and the bottom of the dome are more or less at the same level, in this case the difference is 0.4 mm. So the angle is just the other way around.

Rob.

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 20:05:13
 
Jeff Highland

 

Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

The neck angle is still wrong the end should be lower than the front plane.
All the instructions for solera building I have ever come across say to plane down the neck end of the solera not build it up.
Escribano, it is having the solera this way that then allows anders to fine tune it with shims
Satvic, it makes it hard when you remove images, the comments made about them become impossible to make sense of
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 21:05:08
 
rodpacheco

 

Posts: 80
Joined: Apr. 19 2010
From: Mexico

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

Satvic, check this out... read it slowly, and note that at the very end they mention Flamenco guitars.

What we´re trying to present to you is that, in order to reduce BUZZ, the neck would have to be tilted forward, as if you pushed it away from you, while holding the guitar in a playing position.

That's why the Solera would have to be tapered, from the 12th fret (which is ZERO), to the Nut (reducing or planing or sanding away 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3mm, etc. Whatever Set up you wish). The more forward the neck is tilted (NECK RELIEF), the LESS Buzz the guitar is likely to have, for now you have CLEARANCE.

If you were to tilt it BACK, you would get MORE Buzz, and the bridge would have to be super high (more that 12 or 13mm), as John Shelton commented.



http://www.hillguitar.com/website/news/articles/classical_guitar_setup.html


ANYWAY, read this carefully... Maaan, Pretty intense thread!! hahah
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 21:42:27
 
Andy Culpepper

Posts: 3023
Joined: Mar. 30 2009
From: NY, USA

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to rodpacheco

I was just going to say what rod just pointed out.
The neck part of the solera has to be shaved DOWNwards.

btw in my earlier post when I said 20' radius I meant 25'

_____________________________

Andy Culpepper, luthier
http://www.andyculpepper.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 21:45:58
 
rodpacheco

 

Posts: 80
Joined: Apr. 19 2010
From: Mexico

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to rodpacheco

P.s. Only a little forward tilt is needed for flamenco guitars!!
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 21:52:50
 
Andy Culpepper

Posts: 3023
Joined: Mar. 30 2009
From: NY, USA

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to rodpacheco

quote:

P.s. Only a little forward tilt is needed for flamenco guitars!!


I always wondered why people say this. I generally use a little more tilt on Flamencos than I do on classics because I want the string height at the bridge to be lower without radically tapering the fingerboard...

_____________________________

Andy Culpepper, luthier
http://www.andyculpepper.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 21:59:40
 
Jeff Highland

 

Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

Yeah Andy I built a flamenco and a classical earlier this year on the same solera with a 3mm neck slope on the solera. just shimmed as necessary
The flamenco used slightly more forward angle
But it does also depend on fretbord thickness, dome height etc.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 22:08:59
 
rodpacheco

 

Posts: 80
Joined: Apr. 19 2010
From: Mexico

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to Andy Culpepper

Agree, though I mentioned this, so as to not confuse Satvic, when I said the more Tilt Forward, the Less Buzz, where HE could get the idea of giving if a much bigger Tilt, and ending up having to make his bridge TOO Low. And not achieving the set up he wishes, which is 2.5 at 12th, and 10 at bridge height.

Once again, There's many ways to proceed depending on the set up wanted, Action, Buzz, etc.

Saludos!
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 22:15:55
 
Escribano

Posts: 6415
Joined: Jul. 6 2003
From: England, living in Italy

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to Jeff Highland

quote:

Escribano, it is having the solera this way that then allows anders to fine tune it with shims


OK, I think I get it

_____________________________

Foro Flamenco founder and Admin
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 22:28:14
 
rodpacheco

 

Posts: 80
Joined: Apr. 19 2010
From: Mexico

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to Escribano

Tronco, you don't have to get your coat!! ahaha Saludos!
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 22:35:09
 
jshelton5040

Posts: 1500
Joined: Jan. 17 2005
 

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

quote:

ORIGINAL: satvic

Thank you Jon!!! corrected. I assume it's the final version and get to work? :)



I'm sorry Satvic, I led you wrong, the other diagram is the correct one. Odd how you can build the damn thing but look at a diagram and see it wrong. Jeff Highland had it right. What I said about measurements and dimensions is still correct though.

Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

_____________________________

John Shelton - www.sheltonfarrettaguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 22:43:04
 
Jeff Highland

 

Posts: 401
Joined: Mar. 5 2010
From: Caves Beach Australia

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

Satvic, here is a simple way of working out the geometry you want

Draw a line 650 long and mark the midpoint.

This line is the plane of the front of the body at the rim edge (the original face of the solera)

The left end is the bridge, the midpoint the 12th fret and the right end the nut.

Now using an exagerated scale of 10mm to the mm we draw in another line above it representing the underside of the strings.

So at the bridge we come up 1.6mm (16mm) for the doming
plus 10mm (100mm) for you desired string height, so make a mark 116 above the line
Now at the midpoint come up 6mm (60mm)for the fretboard plus 1mm (10mm)for the fret plus 2.5mm(25mm) for your desired string height. Make a mark 95mm above the base line.

Now project these points down to the nut end.
You should be 74mm above the base line.
Working down from the stringline, take off 10mm for the fret thickness,60mm for fretboard thickness and you are left with 4mm which represents 0.4mm forward set on the neck

This is because you have a low dome 1.6mm, low flamenco action but a relatively high bridge string height of 10mm
Play around with this, putting in different numbers for the variable and you should get the idea of how it works

If you set up your solera with 3mm forward on the neck it is easy to shim it to a lesser abount to fine tune for your desired result.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Sep. 13 2010 22:47:14
 
El Burdo

 

Posts: 632
Joined: Sep. 8 2011
 

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to Jeff Highland

Hi

Reading this, I find myself confused about whether you are all talking about guitars or soleras.
The neck on the guitar is angled upwards, forming an angle of say, 2 degrees less than 180 to the plane of the soundboard. This will happen naturally as well under the tension of the strings.
The solera therefore, because we build face down, will have to be angled downwards at the neck end. Adjustments will of necessity be made shaving the fingerboard and bridge saddle.
I hope that's right as I'm about to plane the solera like that!
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 30 2012 11:34:31
 
Stephen Eden

 

Posts: 914
Joined: Apr. 12 2008
From: UK

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to satvic

yup this is correct in most cases. It does depend on the desired string height from the sound board really so its probably best to draw a picture of everything based on the string and your desired height from the soundboard. include your dome in this too

_____________________________

Classical and Flamenco Guitars www.EdenGuitars.co.uk
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 30 2012 13:27:20
 
El Burdo

 

Posts: 632
Joined: Sep. 8 2011
 

RE: Solera specs ??? (in reply to Stephen Eden

Right - and make any adjustments due to the natural bending up of the neck afterwards? I will do a drawing now.

Some time later.... I've also decided not to plane my solera, but cut it at the neck/body join and re-attach at the new angle. Easier and cleaner.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 30 2012 13:37:27
Page:   [1] 2    >   >>
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1] 2    >   >>
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.09375 secs.