Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
RE: soundportparty in my patio
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
a_arnold
Posts: 558
Joined: Jul. 30 2006
|
RE: soundportparty in my patio (in reply to Ron.M)
|
|
|
quote:
Hey..you stealin' my idea Tony? (page 1) Hey Ron -- great minds think alike, I guess. Sorry, I must have missed that. A few months ago I tried taking apart an audiotechnica lapel mic system -- even in the plastic case the belt pack would fit inside a soundhole. I was thinking I could build a soundhole-mounted clamp that would hold the beltpack, but it interfered with the sound of the guitar too much. Sounded terrible when not amplified (it covered too much of the soundhole). Plus the controls and battery access were still a problem. I would have had to unmount it to turn it off and on. Everything was mounted directly to an integrated circuit. I called a bunch of people who make lapel mics and in-guitar mics, and suggested that they might have a market if they could make a system like the Miniflex 2mic model 1 or 2 (reviewed at acousticguitar.com/newgear) and add transmitter electronics, (and maybe a AAA battery access tube through the endpin?) all controlled by a Fisher-style dial inside the soundhole. I'm not sure they actually have anybody who has influence over product development, so I doubt anybody even passed on the suggestion. The miniflex system is built for guitars, and so is good at eliminating feedback and has the advantage of a mounting tool that reaches through an endpin hole up to the soundhole to make mounting easy and does no damage to the guitar. Quick and easy. But no transmitter. So now I'm thinking the soundport is a better location because you wouldn't even have to drill an endpin hole, but the audiotechnica beltpack is too big to fit the usual soundport (if there is a "usual" soundport after this thread). And anyway, audiotechnica is really a public speaking lapel mic system -- which is what the Paco Pena cuadro uses, also the Noche Flamenca group -- but it leaves you tethered to the guitar and has a feedback problem at high volume. The miniflex system has the 2 mics mechanically (not electronically) out of phase to cut down feedback. I think the gooseneck wires are different lengths. I haven't tried very hard to get anyone interested, but I'd say there would be a huge audience for an endpin-mounted system like the miniflex but with added transmitter and a soundhole side clip with an on-off-volume control wheel (invisible, inside the soundhole but reachable by a finger). The market would be basically every acoustic guitar player on the planet. The market for a soundport-mounted system would be much smaller, bcz fewer people have soundports. Although mounting and demounting would be a snap. I wonder how miniflex would react to a petition signed by a lot of guitarists from places like the foro?
_____________________________
"Flamenco is so emotionally direct that a trained classical musician would require many years of highly disciplined formal study to fail to understand it."
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date May 7 2010 9:11:31
|
|
Ron.M
Posts: 7051
Joined: Jul. 7 2003
From: Scotland
|
RE: soundportparty in my patio (in reply to a_arnold)
|
|
|
Hi Tony, I was having a look at some wireless mics on the net and it seems that to comply with regulations on the "licence free" UHF band, you are limited to 10mW (handheld) and 50mW (belt pack)..... I wonder why the difference..why not ALL 50mW? So the power consumption would not be a big issue in comparison with the radio mics working in the "licenced bands" which have considerably higher power output. Also it seems manufacturers have opted for "space diversity" (2 antennae or 2 receivers in the same box), rather than transmitting on dual or multiple frequencies. However, if you were building from scratch, 1.5V is very low for the amateur to build with...even 3V is low, but a bit more practical. There are RF FM low-power transmitter OEM module manufacturers around, but the prices I've seen are around £60 each for small-quantity orders. Also a medium quality small "gooseneck" mic is around £60. I had been thinking of a "cork" affair which fits in the soundport with an adjustable"bendy" mic attached to the bottom of the cork and the body of the cork containing the electronics, with batteries insertable from the top along with an on/off/channel select switch and LED. So this would not be cheap to manufacture on a small scale! And then you need a diversity receiver at around £150... Also you would have to make it adaptable for different diameter soundports. I think it's the sort of thing I would make if I wanted one myself...but to go into small scale production and make a profit you would have to give it a lot of thought IMO, or have some sort of financial backing for set up costs if you were going to make a commercially good-looking item. I could probably make a cheap and nasty one made from components which would not comply with regulations for about £20....but that's another story! cheers, Ron
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date May 8 2010 7:20:49
|
|
a_arnold
Posts: 558
Joined: Jul. 30 2006
|
RE: soundportparty in my patio (in reply to Ron.M)
|
|
|
Ron: quote:
I was having a look at some wireless mics on the net and it seems that to comply with regulations on the "licence free" UHF band, you are limited to 10mW (handheld) and 50mW (belt pack)..... I wonder why the difference..why not ALL 50mW? No idea. Possibly political pressure from beltpack manufacturers at the time the law was passed? Or possibly the CIA uses beltpacks when talking into their sleeves. quote:
So the power consumption would not be a big issue in comparison with the radio mics working in the "licenced bands" which have considerably higher power output. Yeah. the 2 AA batteries in my uhf beltpack last for many months of moderate use. quote:
Also it seems manufacturers have opted for "space diversity" (2 antennae or 2 receivers in the same box), rather than transmitting on dual or multiple frequencies. So what would be the advantage of transmitting on multiple freqs? Just being able to switch freqs? Many receivers scan for signal in the appropriate wavelengths and then lock in so you can use several transmitters with the same receiver. Or is there an advantage in sound quality? quote:
However, if you were building from scratch, 1.5V is very low for the amateur to build with...even 3V is low, but a bit more practical. There are RF FM low-power transmitter OEM module manufacturers around, but the prices I've seen are around £60 each for small-quantity orders. Also a medium quality small "gooseneck" mic is around £60. I had been thinking of a "cork" affair which fits in the soundport with an adjustable"bendy" mic attached to the bottom of the cork and the body of the cork containing the electronics, with batteries insertable from the top along with an on/off/channel select switch and LED. I was thinking a rubber gasket on the outside and screw-tightened L brackets on the inside, but essentially the same concept. Either would be ideal. I wonder if anyone like Heathkit or Radioshack makes an IC kit transmitter that would fit through a soundport. quote:
So this would not be cheap to manufacture on a small scale! And then you need a diversity receiver at around £150... Also you would have to make it adaptable for different diameter soundports. I think it's the sort of thing I would make if I wanted one myself...but to go into small scale production and make a profit you would have to give it a lot of thought IMO, or have some sort of financial backing for set up costs if you were going to make a commercially good-looking item. I could probably make a cheap and nasty one made from components which would not comply with regulations for about £20....but that's another story! I tried one of those Chinese "cheap and nasty" lapel mics w/ transmitter/receiver. About US$10 on ebay. Useless. The feedback was an overwhelming problem and even when there was no feedback the sound was terrible. Didn't sound anything like a guitar, even tweaking at the amp end. I'll send it to you free if you pay the postage. But I don't recommend you bother. However, it was the smallest and cheapest of all. The board on the audiotechnica lapel mic actually has quite a bit on it. Cheers, Tony
_____________________________
"Flamenco is so emotionally direct that a trained classical musician would require many years of highly disciplined formal study to fail to understand it."
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date May 8 2010 13:15:37
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.078125 secs.
|