Ricardo -> RE: Paco and compas. (Nov. 30 2008 9:53:33)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Stu Thanks Ricardo, that's kind of what I thought, thanks for confirming that! I'm still a little unsure on one thing though, although he's being liberal which doesn't make it rhythmically obvious, I would still have thought that I could tap a constant beat to it and although it may sound full of push and pull it is still happening withing that constant beat. For example if we knew exactly what speed he was playing and ran a metronome behind it (at that speed) would he be getting ahead of it and falling behind it, but eventually catching up and be in time with it, or would he just lose that click altogether? hope that makes sense it does in my head. Stu I know some folks look at rubato like a give and take, and it all works out in the end. But I dont' hold to that. To me, the only way to hold tempo solid is to groove. Once you displace a single subdivided note, you imlpy a different tempo, and the groove is over. So basically NO, as soon as the tempo was changed, it changed for ever. Perhaps he revisits it, but metronome idea would never work unless you turned the dial accordingly. So pointless to tap steadily. You can however, follow the tempo changes just fine if you truely understand how he subdivides. That is how we actually change tempo with a dancer. A dancer can change tempo just with contra tiempos for example, without needing to mark the beat and accents.
|
|
|
|