Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Playing: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=1
- - Tabs: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=6
- - - Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=94633



Message


sam_m -> Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 25 2008 9:39:23)

As the title suggests, please, but nothing too difficult as I'm something of a novice.

Hopefully this won't start a massive for/against tab argument, as that's certainly not the intention, I'm simply trying to improve my sight-reading.

[:)]




mark indigo -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 25 2008 11:15:01)

if you really want to improve your sight reading, try "Progressive Reading For Guitarists" by Stephen Dodgson and Hector Quine, published by Ricordi, or "Musicianship and Sight Reading for Guitarists" by Oliver Hunt, published by New Musical Services




sam_m -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 25 2008 15:49:27)

Cheers Mark, I meant specifically flamenco books, but I may well check those out anyway.




mark indigo -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 11:08:47)

quote:

I meant specifically flamenco books


yeah i know you did, but i didn't want to comment on the "unusual" nature of your request 'cos i'm trying real hard not to "start a massive for/against tab argument"

um.... i could explain, but maybe you don't really want me to....




sam_m -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 12:16:43)

Not at all - feel free to elaborate, Mark.

I must admit I was wondering why tab is used so much with flamenco music, so feel free to enlighten me.

[:)]




koella -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 12:43:58)

I saw some flamenco books in standard notation. They were really bad from a flamenco kind of view. I remember one from Andres Batista.

But feel free to use them as sight reading items. It won't help you to learn to play flamenco though.




sam_m -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 12:54:18)

"It won't help you to learn to play flamenco though."

Why do you say that?

(And how do you quote on here?)




koella -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 13:03:47)

Like I said, there are no good flamenco books, I know of, that are in standard notation only. There are a lot of good books in tab though.

Maybe you should try the paco pena book "music from the student reportoire"
It's in tab ánd standard notation.

The reason flamenco is mostly in tab is maybe because there is no history in standard notation. So there's no need to use standard notation.
In fact, when you take flamenco guitar lessons there's very often not even paper involved.

In classical it's of course very useful because there's loads of 500 year old music that needs to be reanimated.[:D]




Georg -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 13:29:21)

I would leave the standardnotation for classical guitar. If you want to improve your sight reading ability, try the sight reading samples for classical guitar here:

Great Classical Guitar Site

However, if you really want flamenco pieces in good standard notation try to get a copy of "flamenco puro" by Joseph Trotter.

There are also a lot of tabledit, guitar pro and powertab files available on this foro. I think all three programms allow you to switch off the tablature line.




mark indigo -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 13:44:28)

quote:

I must admit I was wondering why tab is used so much with flamenco music, so feel free to enlighten me.


quote:

"It won't help you to learn to play flamenco though."

Why do you say that?


Most flamenco guitarists who grow up with it etc. play solely by ear, by listening and watching, and don't write anything, don't have any need to read or write any music (I said MOST, not all, Manolo Sanlucar, Rafael Riqueni and Cañizares being notable exceptions, but they learned to read long after they learned to play...).

Athough structure is provided by the palos or flamenco forms, and by compas and various conventions, there is also a lot of freedom and improvisation, and notating can have an effect of "fixing" things a bit too much (i have had lessons where the teacher not only didn't write anything down, he wouldn't even hardly show specific things, but would play stuff and tell me to go for my own interpretation rather than note for note details).

Flamenco, when transcribed at all, is usually transcribed into either tab (with or without "best of both worlds" time value stems and beams) or tab/dot notation combined in double staves. Tab is used, if at all, as a memory aid, with an assumption that you either were shown how to play it by another guitarist already, or have a video or audio source as reference.

Compared to the amount of flamenco music that exists in audio and visual form, there is very little transcribed, paper is just not the currency (or gp, pdf, whatever), and ultimately you are going to have to use your ears and to some extent your eyes, so why bother developing sight reading? why not spend the time developing ear? if your ultimate goal is to play flamenco then it's probably better to spend an hour learning one falseta by ear that you can play by heart than spending an hour sightreading ten pieces composed of ten falsetas each (ie. a hundred falsetas) that you can't remember and/or play afterwards.

There is seldom any need for anyone to read music for any other instrument as, at least historically, and until very recently, the guitar is/has been the only instrument involved. Tablature was one of the first forms of music notation developed by lute players, and the need for "standard" notation came about writing for groups, orchestras etc. where players of different instruments all play off the same score, so in a sense there's no need for standard notation/dots....

The really big advantage of tab is that as you can play the top E in 5 places on a spanish guitar (more i guess on electric) tab will tell you which one, whereas dots can be ambiguous. Tab will give you the fingering, hand positions etc. very clearly. A lot of flamenco guitar music is based around fingerboard positions and chord shapes etc. and chords which mix notes fretted up the fingerboard with open strings are much simpler to read in tab than in dots (in my opinion/experience).

The main gripe that dot readers seem to have about tab is that it doesn't convey the time values of the notes indicated in the tab, but this problem can be solved by adding stems and beams from standard notation (which is why i called it "best of both worlds") onto the fret numbers. Alain Faucher uses this method for his individual transcriptions (website here: http://www.affedis.com/) though in his books he uses the double line standard notation/tab layout. The other gripe is that even with time values added, tab cannot convey the musical information of standard notation. In classical music, as i understand it, the composers score is the ultimate source, but in flamenco the reference is going to be the actual sound, either live, or recorded, so the necessary musical information is contained in that, not in any transcription of it. In classical music the score is primary and any recording is secondary, an interpretation of that score. In flamenco the live performance, or recording of it is primary, and any transcription is going to be secondary (and probably riddled with errors, lol!)

The only non-tab flamenco notation i've come across is either weird japanese transcriptions of more or less correct dots but clueless fingering, or "flamenco for classical guitarists" atrocities - simplifications of older style flamenco guitar styles with no idea how to notate or transcribe rasgeo, and usually played by people with no idea how to execute them....

There are several ways to quote. One is to highlight and copy text, and click reply. If you already clicked reply, you can go back to the original, copy relevant text, come back to the reply box/window, press the quote button, and paste your text in between the two bracket things. I'm really not a techie so this is probably a crap way to do it.




sam_m -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 14:26:44)

Cheers guys, the abundance of tab makes more sense now - the reasons you give are things I was aware of but I thought more would have been appropriated to standard notation by classical bods for teaching and so forth.

quote:

why bother developing sight reading?


Well, because the better my sight-reading is, the more music I have access to. I fancy that's a whole different discussion though.

Thanks for the input guys.

[;)]




mark indigo -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 26 2008 14:58:04)

quote:

the better my sight-reading is, the more music I have access to


only if it's written in dots![:D][:D]




Taranto -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 27 2008 12:03:21)

quote:

Most flamenco guitarists who grow up with it etc. play solely by ear, by listening and watching, and don't write anything, don't have any need to read or write any music


Yeah, no need except when they want to play with non-flamenco musicians.
Wonder how paco learnt cocierto de aranjuez?

If flamenco is all about playing in pubs and weddings then reading and writing is indeed not needed.




koella -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 27 2008 12:07:32)

I remember PDL did "sombrero de tres picos"by DeFalla.
I believe I read , right then, that he had it all done by ear.




Taranto -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 27 2008 12:15:00)

quote:

I remember PDL did "sombrero de tres picos"by DeFalla.
I believe I read , right then, that he had it all done by ear.


By ear from whom?




Georg -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 27 2008 12:20:32)

quote:

By ear from whom?


I guess he himself arranged it for guitar. No need for any scores.




koella -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 27 2008 12:41:16)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Taranto
By ear from whom?


From a record of course.
[&:]




Taranto -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 27 2008 13:47:45)

quote:


From a record of course.


Well then he is managing well in the world of classical music.




Taranto -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 27 2008 13:50:50)

quote:

I guess he himself arranged it for guitar. No need for any scores.


Oh he did? Clever, no?




mark indigo -> RE: Recommend Some Good Non-Tab Books (Nov. 27 2008 14:56:28)

quote:

except when they want to play with non-flamenco musicians.


no problem, just get them to play and you can pick it up/play along....[:D]

quote:

Wonder how paco learnt cocierto de aranjuez


he probably heard it a million times before he did that recording....

actually, re the De Falla album Paco did, I read that he knew all the music sort of anyway from hearing it many times in his life, growing up etc., but for the album he got the orchestral scores and a "learn to play (presumably classical) guitar" book with the notes set against a fretboard chart showing how the dots on the stave corresponded to the frets on the guitar.... and worked out his own arrangements.... he said it took him months. That in itself is pretty awesome, just the patience and the time and work he put it. So it was part reading and part ear.

For the Aranjuez, again, he heard it many many times throughout his life and could probably hum most of it ([:D]) already, but i also read he got a classical guitarist to help him. I'm not sure in what capacity, maybe to just play through the score section by section from the page....




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET